Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

AgenticSCR: An Autonomous Agentic Secure Code Review for Immature Vulnerabilities Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2601.19138 v2 pith:3U5RQ47F submitted 2026-01-27 cs.CR cs.AIcs.LGcs.SE

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGcs.SE
keywords codesecureagenticreviewsecurityagenticscrstaticvulnerabilities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Secure code review is critical during pre-integration, where Atlassian developers rely on lightweight analysis tools, while deep security assessment is deferred to later stages, delaying feedback and increasing remediation costs. Existing static analyzers are often noisy and struggle with context-dependent or partially manifested vulnerabilities, while static large language model (LLM) reviewers are constrained by context windows and lack tool interaction. Agentic AI, which combines LLMs with code navigation, shows promise; however, its effectiveness for early-stage secure code review remains underexplored. We present AgenticSCR, an agentic secure code reviewer augmented with security-focused semantic memory that grounds reasoning in structured security knowledge to detect vulnerabilities before they fully manifest. AgenticSCR achieves at least 153% relative improvement in generating comments with correct localization, vulnerability type, and relevance over static LLM baseline, multi-agent reviewer, and SAST tools. In a shadow deployment, 54% of its comments were validated by security engineers for developer reporting, demonstrating practical utility while underscoring the difficulty of the task. These findings position the security-focused semantic memory as a promising direction for agentic secure code review, enabling early-stage vulnerability identification. Our approach builds an important step toward reliable localization, detection, and explanation in shift-left security practices

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PRWeaver: Evaluating LLM-Based Code Auditors against Long-Horizon Malicious Pull Requests

    cs.SE 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A benchmark of 832 matched attack renderings shows long-horizon malicious pull requests evade LLM code auditors most when benign and malicious changes share the active review window.

Pith tools