REVIEW 2 cited by
Can Cross Encoders Produce Useful Sentence Embeddings?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Cross encoders (CEs) are trained with sentence pairs to detect relatedness. As CEs require sentence pairs at inference, the prevailing view is that they can only be used as re-rankers in information retrieval pipelines. Dual encoders (DEs) are instead used to embed sentences, where sentence pairs are encoded by two separate encoders with shared weights at training, and a loss function that ensures the pair's embeddings lie close in vector space if the sentences are related. DEs however, require much larger datasets to train, and are less accurate than CEs. We report a curious finding that embeddings from earlier layers of CEs can in fact be used within an information retrieval pipeline. We show how to exploit CEs to distill a lighter-weight DE, with a 5.15x speedup in inference time.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Cross-Attention Calibrated Deduplication for Retrieval-Augmented Generation System
CACD deduplicates RAG chunks via cross-encoder scores, attention-entropy NIS, and majority vote, dropping ~9.75% of chunks on SQuAD faster than cosine filtering.
-
Position: Text Embeddings Should Capture Implicit Semantics, Not Just Surface Meaning
State-of-the-art text embeddings lag far behind on tasks requiring pragmatic inference, stance detection, and social meaning, relative to their strong performance on surface semantic benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.