pith. sign in

arxiv: 2201.05348 · v2 · pith:5M6X5KU7new · submitted 2022-01-14 · 💻 cs.SE · cs.HC

Software Engineering User Study Recruitment on Prolific: An Experience Report

classification 💻 cs.SE cs.HC
keywords participantsuserprolificresearchersaccessexperienceparticipantprogramming
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Online participant recruitment platforms such as Prolific have been gaining popularity in research, as they enable researchers to easily access large pools of participants. However, participant quality can be an issue; participants may give incorrect information to gain access to more studies, adding unwanted noise to results. This paper details our experience recruiting participants from Prolific for a user study requiring programming skills in Node.js, with the aim of helping other researchers conduct similar studies. We explore a method of recruiting programmer participants using prescreening validation, attention checks and a series of programming knowledge questions. We received 680 responses, and determined that 55 met the criteria to be invited to our user study. We ultimately conducted user study sessions via video calls with 10 participants. We conclude this paper with a series of recommendations for researchers.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Academic Integrity and Emotional Responses to Inappropriate LLM Use in Software Engineering Education

    cs.SE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Cross-sectional survey of 116 SE undergraduates finds heterogeneous emotional responses to perceived inappropriate LLM use, dominated by indifference with context-dependent guilt, anxiety, relief, and satisfaction.