Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 79 references

A hyper-runaway white dwarf in Gaia DR2 as a Type Iax supernova primary remnant candidate

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A nearby white dwarf is fleeing the galaxy at 605 km/s, and it may be the first fully cooled remnant of a Type Iax supernova.

desk verdict A plausible candidate identification that deserves a careful referee: the unbound claim rests on a thin kinematic margin, but the paper is honest about what it does and does not prove. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.00670 v1 pith:5TFS5HGV submitted 2019-08-02 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE

Nicholas J. Ruffini , Andrew R. Casey This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE
keywords whitedwarfshyper-runawaystarsTypeIaxsupernovaesupernovaremnantcandidatesGaiaDR2stellarkinematicscarbondwarfMilkyWayescapespeed
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper identifies the white dwarf LP 93-21, only about 57 parsecs from the Sun, as the closest known hyper-runaway star: it is moving at roughly 605 km/s relative to the Galactic centre, above the local escape speed of about 557 km/s, and its orbit is unbound to the Milky Way in every integration the authors ran. The authors combine Gaia parallax and proper motion with a single SDSS radial velocity, draw orbits in a three-component model of the Milky Way's gravity, and rule out an extragalactic origin. They argue that the most plausible ejection mechanism is a Type Iax supernova in which the white dwarf survived its own partial deflagration and was kicked away, and that LP 93-21 is the first fully cooled example of such a primary remnant, with its carbon-rich atmosphere as supporting evidence. A sympathetic reader would care because it supplies a direct stellar link between a specific supernova class and its surviving progenitor, a link that has been largely missing.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is orbit integration in a static, three-component Milky Way gravitational potential: a spheroidal bulge, a flattened disk, and a dark-matter halo, with the component weights fixed by a published Milky Way mass model. Input positions and velocities are drawn from the Gaia DR2 covariance matrix, preserving correlations between the astrometric quantities, and the radial velocity comes from the SDSS spectrum. The orbit set does two jobs: it converts the observed 605 km/s into a statement about binding (local escape speed 557 km/s, all orbits unbound), and it bounds the flight time since ejection at about 220 Myr if the star was born inside the Galaxy. That flight-time bound is what lets the paper separate the Type Iax primary-remnant interpretation from the donor-remnant and double-degenerate interpretations.

What would settle it

Measure a new, high-signal-to-noise radial velocity for LP 93-21. If it disagrees with 462 km/s by more than roughly 50 km/s, the star's galactocentric speed drops below the model escape speed and it becomes bound; alternatively, adopt an independently calibrated Milky Way potential with a local escape speed above about 605 km/s and the same conclusion follows. A detailed spectrum could also falsify the supernova-remnant story by failing to show the rotation or elemental signatures expected from a survived deflagration.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

LP 93-21 is a single, massive (about 1.03 solar masses), carbon-atmosphere white dwarf at 57.2 pc whose total galactocentric velocity is about 605 km/s while the local escape speed is about 557 km/s; all 100 integrated orbits are unbound, and the star probably passed within 46 pc of the Sun about 70,000 years ago. The paper argues that its velocity cannot be explained by normal dynamical ejection or core-collapse supernova kicks, and that it is not from the Galactic centre, the Magellanic clouds, or known supernova remnants. The Milky Way flight time is at most about 220 Myr, comfortably shorter than its multi-gigayear cooling age, so the object must either have been ejected very recently or spent most of its cooling life elsewhere. The authors find that the Type Iax primary-remnant scenario, in which an asymmetric partial deflagration leaves the white dwarf mostly intact and kicks it out of a binary with a helium-star companion, is consistent with the speed, the cooling age, and the enhanced carbon abundance, and they present LP 93-21 as the likely first fully cooled member of the recently recognised class of Type Iax primary remnants.

Load-bearing premise

The result stands on one radial-velocity measurement (462 ± 20 km/s from an SDSS spectrum) and on the adopted Milky Way potential, whose local escape speed is 557 km/s; a systematic error of about 50 km/s in that velocity, or a heavier Galactic potential, would make LP 93-21 bound, and the Type Iax interpretation would lose its kinematic foundation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If LP 93-21 is a cooled Type Iax primary remnant, the predicted population of such remnants exists and is observable, not merely theoretical.
  • The observed flight time of at most ~220 Myr, combined with a ~2.7 Gyr cooling age, means an ejected white dwarf can spend most of its cooling life outside the Milky Way before passing near the Sun.
  • LP 93-21 becomes the closest hyper-runaway star known, at 57.2 pc, and therefore a benchmark for studying the kinematics of supernova-ejected remnants.
  • The helium-star donor channel for Type Ia and Iax supernovae should produce many high-velocity white dwarfs, but they are intrinsically faint; magnitude-limited surveys will find more of them closer to us.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the identification holds, LP 93-21 is a natural calibration point for the ejected-remnant cooling sequence: its mass and carbon abundance can be compared directly with three-dimensional deflagration models to test whether hybrid carbon-oxygen-neon progenitors leave massive bound remnants.
  • The same screen of Gaia astrometry plus a single spectrum could be applied to other high proper-motion white dwarfs, and the yield may be dozens of unbound objects, with nearby examples favoured simply because faint stars are only visible close by.
  • A single radial-velocity measurement is the fragile link in this chain; a multi-epoch campaign on LP 93-21 would turn a candidate into a confirmed unbound object and sharpen the comparison with the escape speed.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. Ruffini and Casey combine Gaia DR2 astrometry with a single SDSS radial velocity to compute the space motion of the DQ white dwarf LP 93-21, obtaining v_gal ≈ 605 km/s against a local escape speed of ≈ 557 km/s and finding the star unbound in all 100 gala orbit integrations. They further argue against an extragalactic origin, exclude dynamical and core-collapse ejection channels, and propose that LP 93-21 is the first known fully cooled primary remnant of a Type Iax supernova, based on consistency with Iax ejection simulations and on the carbon abundance reported by Kilic et al. (2018). The paper explicitly notes that a detailed spectrum is still needed to confirm the scenario.

Significance. If the kinematic unbound claim is robust, LP 93-21 would be a valuable and interesting object: the closest hyper-runaway white dwarf, and potentially the first fully cooled Type Iax primary remnant, directly connecting a predicted population of ejected remnants to observations. The paper has the strengths of using public Gaia/SDSS data, transparent orbit integrations with gala, and clearly framing the Type Iax interpretation as a consistency argument rather than a direct detection. However, the central claim depends on a narrow 48 km/s margin between the derived velocity and the adopted escape speed, with limited propagation of uncertainties, and the spectroscopic evidence is not yet discriminating relative to the normal DQ population. The result is promising but requires additional robustness work before the headline claim is secure.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.1, Figs 1-3] The central claim that LP 93-21 is gravitationally unbound rests on a margin of only about 48 km/s between v_gal = 605 km/s and v_esc = 557 km/s, yet the manuscript does not report the propagated uncertainty in v_gal, does not include the ±20 km/s SDSS radial velocity uncertainty in the Monte Carlo orbit sampling (the text says initial positions are drawn from the Gaia covariance but treats the radial velocity as uncorrelated), and uses only one adopted Milky Way potential. Please propagate all observables into v_gal, test a range of published Milky Way potentials or escape speed values, and report the fraction of orbits that remain unbound. Without this, the unbound claim and the Section 3 exclusions that depend on it are not established at the precision claimed.
  2. [Sections 2.2, 3, and Abstract] The abundance evidence is overstated: the abstract refers to 'anomalous elemental abundances ... via spectroscopic follow-up', but no new or follow-up spectrum is presented, and the [C/He] = -3.51 dex value is adopted from Kilic et al. (2018) for a DQ white dwarf, whose defining characteristic is strong carbon Swan bands. No comparison to the normal DQ population is made, so 'anomalous' is not demonstrated, and the authors themselves state in Section 4 that a detailed spectrum is needed. I recommend rewording the abstract to match the evidence and explicitly treating the carbon abundance as a non-discriminating consistency argument unless a comparative DQ analysis is added.
  3. [Section 2.1, Eq. (1)] The exclusion of an extragalactic origin depends on several assumed quantities: isotropic ejection, a 100 pc observable radius, an average speed of 600 km/s, and the Li et al. (2011) rate-mass relation. The text says 'This value remains much less than one even if we relax our assumptions' but no sensitivity analysis is shown. Since this exclusion is used to keep LP 93-21 within the Milky Way and hence within the SNe Ia/Iax ejection framework, please present a small sensitivity table varying the observable radius, ejection speed, and rate normalisation, and state clearly that Eq. (1) gives an expectation value rather than a probability for the specific star's origin.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.1 and Table 1] The radial velocity source is inconsistent: the text cites Kleinman et al. (2013) while Table 1 lists Abolfathi et al. (2018); please harmonise the reference.
  2. [Section 2.1] The statement that six known supernova remnants are excluded as origins is made without showing the comparison; a brief description or figure reference would help the reader assess this claim.
  3. [Section 3] The phrase 'very likely never below 400 km/s' should be accompanied by a quantitative uncertainty, since it derives from the same kinematic solution as the v_gal estimate.
  4. [Figure 4 caption and running header] There are minor typographical issues: 'one millionGaia stars' is missing a space, and the running header contains 'L ATEX' and 'file' artifacts from LaTeX compilation.
  5. [Abstract and Conclusions] The wording alternates between 'likely first known example' and 'first identified example'; since this is a candidate identification, please consistently qualify the claim as a candidate awaiting spectroscopic confirmation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the unbound velocity claim is a measurement plus an externally parameterized potential, and the Type Iax scenario is an external consistency argument.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce any conclusion to its own inputs. (1) The galactocentric velocity vgal = 605 km/s is computed from Gaia DR2 proper motion and parallax plus a single SDSS radial velocity of 462 ± 20 km/s; it is an adopted measurement, not a fitted parameter. (2) The local escape speed vesc = 557 km/s comes from a fixed gala Milky Way potential with parameters taken from Bovy (2015) and a circular velocity from Bovy et al. (2012)/Eilers et al. (2019); it is not tuned to make LP 93-21 unbound. (3) The statement that LP 93-21 is unbound in all 100 integrated orbits follows from propagating astrometric covariances through this fixed potential; no parameter is adjusted to force that outcome. (4) The exclusion of dynamical and core-collapse channels uses external simulation velocity distributions (Perets & Subr 2012; Tauris 2015), and the exclusion of an extragalactic origin uses an expectation calculation with external galaxy catalog data and SN Ia rates (Li et al. 2011; Karachentsev et al. 2013); these are prior estimates, not fits to LP 93-21. (5) The Type Iax primary-remnant interpretation is presented as a consistency argument with external models (Jordan et al. 2012; Kromer et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2019; Raddi et al. 2019), and the paper explicitly flags that a detailed spectrum is still needed. There is no load-bearing self-citation, no fitted input renamed as a prediction, and no equation that is identical to its input by construction. The narrow margin between vgal and vesc and the reliance on a single radial velocity and one Galactic potential are genuine robustness concerns, but they are not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central measured quantities (parallax, proper motion, radial velocity) come from public surveys and are not fitted here. The main assumptions are the Milky Way potential, the reliability of one SDSS radial velocity, and the prior model-atmosphere fit for mass and carbon abundance. The extragalactic background calculation introduces two hand-picked values (100 pc visibility, 600 km/s average speed). No new physical entities are invented.

free parameters (2)
  • Observable radius for fully cooled extra-galactic white dwarf donors = 100 pc
    Adopted in Eq. 1 and the surrounding text; the expected number of observable extra-galactic donors (10^-4) scales as the cube of this radius.
  • Average ejection speed for extra-galactic donor remnants = 600 km/s
    Used in Section 3 to estimate transit time through the observable volume; chosen to include deceleration and acceleration effects.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Milky Way gravitational potential model implemented in gala (Hernquist bulge, Miyamoto-Nagai disk, NFW halo with Bovy 2015 parameters) and the adopted circular velocity of 250 km/s give a local escape speed near 557 km/s.
    Entered in Section 2.1; the unbound classification compares measured vgal = 605 km/s to this modeled vesc = 557 km/s. A heavier potential would reduce or remove the excess.
  • domain assumption The SDSS radial velocity of 462 km/s is the true line-of-sight velocity of LP 93-21, with only the adopted plus or minus 20 km/s uncertainty.
    Used in Section 2.1 to build the three-dimensional velocity; no second epoch or independent radial velocity measurement is given.
  • domain assumption The model-atmosphere fit by Kilic et al. (2018), pure helium plus trace carbon, correctly yields mass 1.029 solar masses, effective temperature, cooling age 2.715 Gyr, and [C/He] = -3.51.
    Adopted in Table 1 and Section 2.2; the Type Iax consistency argument relies on the high mass, carbon abundance, and the cooling age being compatible with a flight time under 220 Myr.
  • domain assumption The cited hydrodynamical and binary population models for SNe Ia/Iax (Jordan et al. 2012; Kromer et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2019; Shen et al. 2018a) correctly predict the existence and velocities of ejected primary remnants.
    Used in Section 3 to argue that LP 93-21's velocity is plausibly explained by the Iax primary remnant channel; the argument inherits the validity of these simulations.
  • ad hoc to paper The probability calculation for extragalactic donors assumes isotropic ejection, a 100 pc observable volume, an average speed of 600 km/s, and SN Ia rates from Li et al. (2011).
    Used in Section 3 to rule out an extragalactic origin; the estimate is order of magnitude and the assumptions are chosen by the authors, not derived from data.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A hyper-runaway white dwarf in Gaia DR2 as a Type Iax supernova primary remnant candidate." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5TFS5HGV

@misc{pith2026190800670,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A hyper-runaway white dwarf in Gaia DR2 as a Type Iax supernova primary remnant candidate},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5TFS5HGV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.00670}
}
abstract

Observations of stellar remnants linked to Type Ia and Type Iax supernovae are necessary to fully understand their progenitors. Multiple progenitor scenarios predict a population of kicked donor remnants and partially-burnt primary remnants, both moving with relatively high velocity. But only a handful of examples consistent with these two predicted populations have been observed. Here we report the likely first known example of an unbound white dwarf that is consistent with being the fully-cooled primary remnant to a Type Iax supernova. The candidate, LP 93-21, is travelling with a galactocentric velocity of v$_{gal}$ $\simeq$ 605 km s$^{-1}$, and is gravitationally unbound to the Milky Way. We rule out an extragalactic origin. The Type Iax supernova ejection scenario is consistent with its peculiar unbound trajectory, given anomalous elemental abundances are detected in its photosphere via spectroscopic follow-up. This discovery reflects recent models that suggest stellar ejections likely occur often. Unfortunately the intrinsic faintness of white dwarfs, and the uncertainty associated with their direct progenitor systems, makes it difficult to detect and confirm such donors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.00670 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. LP 93-21’s orbit. The current position of LP 93-21 is shown by a black circle. The integrated orbits trace LP 93-21’s movement forward in time (red) and backwards in time (blue). The spread in orbit directions is caused by the uncertainty in Gaia and SDSS measurements. The extent of the Milky Way’s spiral arms are approximated by the darker, dashed circle, and the galactic centre is approximated by the intersection … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. LP 93-21’s proximity to the Sun. The current position of LP 93-21 is shown by a black circle. The position of the Sun is denoted by a yellow star. The integrated orbits trace LP 93-21’s movement forward in time (red) and backwards in time (blue). The spread in orbit directions is caused by the uncertainty in Gaia and SDSS measurements. LP 93-21’s closest approach around 70,000 years ago was approximately 46 pc [PIT… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Kinematic and positional parameters for LP 93-21 shown as a function of flight time t. Movement forward in time is denoted in red and movement backwards in time is denoted in blue. Top left: galactocentric z-coordinate Zgal. The vertical extent of the thick disk is approximated by the dashed lines. Top right: galactocentric radius Rgal. Bottom left: heliocentric distance dhelio. Bottom right: galactocentric rest-fra… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Hertzsprung-Russel diagram showing a random sample of one million Gaia stars with usual features such as the main sequence, giant branch, and white dwarf sequence. LP 93-21 is denoted by a black dot within the main white dwarf sequence at an approximate absolute G-band…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abolfathi B., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aa9e8a , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJS..235...42A 235, 42

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa9e8a 2018

  2. [2]

    Astropy Collaboration et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2013A&A...558A..33A 558, A33

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  3. [3]

    Astropy Collaboration et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156..123T 156, 123

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f 2018

  4. [4]

    Bailer-Jones C. A. L., Rybizki J., Fouesneau M., Mantelet G., Andrae R., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aacb21 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156...58B 156, 58

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aacb21 2018

  5. [5]

    Remnants of Subdwarf Helium Donor Stars Ejected from Close Binaries with Thermonuclear Supernovae

    Bauer E. B., White C. J., Bildsten L., 2019, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190608941B p. arXiv:1906.08941

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Bergeron P., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/367618 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2003ApJ...586..201B 586, 201

    work page doi:10.1086/367618 2003

  7. [7]

    T., Hamuy M., Leggett S

    Bergeron P., Ruiz M. T., Hamuy M., Leggett S. K., Currie M. J., Lajoie C. P., Dufour P., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/429715 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2005ApJ...625..838B 625, 838

    doi:10.1086/429715 2005

  8. [8]

    R., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa7567 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....154...28B 154, 28

    Blanton M. R., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa7567 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....154...28B 154, 28

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa7567 2017

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    Bovy J., 2015, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/29 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2015ApJS..216...29B 216, 29

    2015 doi

  2. [10]

    Bovy J., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/759/2/131 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...759..131B 759, 131

    2012 doi

  3. [11]

    5-12 July

    Carretero J., et al., 2017, in Proceedings of the European Physical Society Conference on High Energy Physics. 5-12 July. p. 488

    2017

  4. [12]

    C., Oppenheimer B

    Ducourant C., Teixeira R., Hambly N. C., Oppenheimer B. R., Hawkins M. R. S., Rapaport M., Modolo J., Lecampion J. F., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066876 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2007A&A...470..387D 470, 387

    2007 doi

  5. [13]

    W., Rix H.-W., Ness M

    Eilers A.-C., Hogg D. W., Rix H.-W., Ness M. K., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf648 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...871..120E 871, 120

    2019 doi

  6. [15]

    Fink M., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt2315 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2014MNRAS.438.1762F 438, 1762

    2014 doi

  7. [16]

    J., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/57 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2013ApJ...767...57F 767, 57

    Foley R. J., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/57 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2013ApJ...767...57F 767, 57

    2013 doi

  8. [18]

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629272 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A

    2016 doi

  9. [19]

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833051 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

    2018 doi

  10. [20]

    A., 2014, Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014BASI...42...47G 42, 47

    Green D. A., 2014, Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014BASI...42...47G 42, 47

    2014

  11. [21]

    L., Oke J

    Greenstein J. L., Oke J. B., Richstone D., van Altena W. F., Steppe H., 1977, @doi [ ] 10.1086/182568 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1977ApJ...218L..21G 218, L21

    1977 doi

  12. [22]

    Hansen B. M. S., 2003, The Astrophysical Journal, 582, 915

    2003

  13. [23]

    Hernquist L., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1086/168845 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990ApJ...356..359H 356, 359

    1990 doi

  14. [24]

    A., Heber U., O'Toole S

    Hirsch H. A., Heber U., O'Toole S. J., Bresolin F., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200500212 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2005A&A...444L..61H 444, L61

    2005 doi

  15. [25]

    D., 2007, @doi [Computing in Science and Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2007CSE.....9...90H 9, 90

    Hunter J. D., 2007, @doi [Computing in Science and Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2007CSE.....9...90H 9, 90

    2007 doi

  16. [26]

    J., Tutukov A

    Iben I. J., Tutukov A. V., 1984, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.1086/190932 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1984ApJS...54..335I 54, 335

    1984 doi

  17. [27]

    V., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/174484 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1994ApJ...431..264I 431, 264

    Iben Icko J., Tutukov A. V., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/174484 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1994ApJ...431..264I 431, 264

    1994 doi

  18. [28]

    I., Perets H

    Jordan George C. I., Perets H. B., Fisher R. T., van Rossum D. R., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/761/2/L23 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2012ApJ...761L..23J 761, L23

    2012 doi

  19. [29]

    Justham S., Wolf C., Podsiadlowski P., Han Z., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200810106 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2009A&A...493.1081J 493, 1081

    2009 doi

  20. [30]

    D., Makarov D

    Karachentsev I. D., Makarov D. I., Kaisina E. I., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/145/4/101 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013AJ....145..101K 145, 101

    2013 doi

  21. [31]

    O., Kleinman S

    Kepler S. O., Kleinman S. J., Nitta A., Koester D., Castanheira B. G., Giovannini O., Costa A. F. M., Althaus L., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11388.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.375.1315K 375, 1315

    2007

  22. [32]

    C., Rowell N., Crawford C

    Kilic M., Bergeron P., Dame K., Hambly N. C., Rowell N., Crawford C. L., 2018, preprint, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018arXiv181003536K p. arXiv:1810.03536 ( @eprint arXiv 1810.03536 )

    2018 arXiv

  23. [33]

    J., et al., 2013, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.1088/0067-0049/204/1/5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2013ApJS..204....5K 204, 5

    Kleinman S. J., et al., 2013, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.1088/0067-0049/204/1/5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2013ApJS..204....5K 204, 5

    2013 doi

  24. [34]

    Kromer M., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts498 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2013MNRAS.429.2287K 429, 2287

    2013 doi

  25. [35]

    Kromer M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv886 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2015MNRAS.450.3045K 450, 3045

    2015 doi

  26. [36]

    K., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aae7ca , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJS..239...26L 239, 26

    Leggett S. K., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aae7ca , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJS..239...26L 239, 26

    2018 doi

  27. [37]

    V., Poznanski D., Wang X., Ganeshalingam M., Mannucci F., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18162.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.412.1473L 412, 1473

    Li W., Chornock R., Leaman J., Filippenko A. V., Poznanski D., Wang X., Ganeshalingam M., Mannucci F., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18162.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.412.1473L 412, 1473

    2011

  28. [38]

    Lindegren L., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201832727 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

    2018 doi

  29. [39]

    W., Pakmor R., R \"o pke F

    Liu Z. W., Pakmor R., R \"o pke F. K., Edelmann P., Wang B., Kromer M., Hillebrandt W., Han Z. W., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219357 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2012A&A...548A...2L 548, A2

    2012 doi

  30. [40]

    W., Pakmor R., R \"o pke F

    Liu Z. W., Pakmor R., R \"o pke F. K., Edelmann P., Hillebrandt W., Kerzendorf W. E., Wang B., Han Z. W., 2013a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220903 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2013A&A...554A.109L 554, A109

    doi

  31. [41]

    Liu Z.-W., et al., 2013b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/774/1/37 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2013ApJ...774...37L 774, 37

    doi

  32. [42]

    Liu D., Wang B., Han Z., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2756 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473.5352L 473, 5352

    2018 doi

  33. [43]

    Luri X., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201832964 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018A&A...616A...9L 616, A9

    2018 doi

  34. [44]

    J., 1976, Univ

    Luyten W. J., 1976, Univ. Minnesota, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1976LHS...C......0L p. 0

    1976

  35. [45]

    P., Sion E

    McCook G. P., Sion E. M., 1999, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.1086/313186 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1999ApJS..121....1M 121, 1

    1999 doi

  36. [46]

    Miyamoto M., Nagai R., 1975, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1975PASJ...27..533M 27, 533

    1975

  37. [47]

    F., Frenk C

    Navarro J. F., Frenk C. S., White S. D. M., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/177173 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...462..563N 462, 563

    1996 doi

  38. [48]

    Nomoto K., 1982, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159682 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1982ApJ...253..798N 253, 798

    1982 doi

  39. [49]

    Nomoto K., Iwamoto K., Kishimoto N., 1997, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.276.5317.1378 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1997Sci...276.1378N 276, 1378

    1997

  40. [50]

    R., Hambly N

    Oppenheimer B. R., Hambly N. C., Digby A. P., Hodgkin S. T., Saumon D., 2001, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1059954 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2001Sci...292..698O 292, 698

    2001 doi

  41. [51]

    A., R \"o pke F

    Pakmor R., Kromer M., Taubenberger S., Sim S. A., R \"o pke F. K., Hillebrandt W., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/747/1/L10 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2012ApJ...747L..10P 747, L10

    2012 doi

  42. [53]

    M., Taam R

    Pan K.-C., Ricker P. M., Taam R. E., 2012b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/750/2/151 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2012ApJ...750..151P 750, 151

    doi

  43. [55]

    M., Taam R

    Pan K.-C., Ricker P. M., Taam R. E., 2012d, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/760/1/21 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2012ApJ...760...21P 760, 21

    doi

  44. [56]

    Papish O., Soker N., Garc \' a-Berro E., Aznar-Sigu \'a n G., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv337 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2015MNRAS.449..942P 449, 942

    2015 doi

  45. [57]

    M., Napiwotzki R., Heber U., Altmann M., Odenkirchen M., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20052730 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2006A&A...447..173P 447, 173

    Pauli E. M., Napiwotzki R., Heber U., Altmann M., Odenkirchen M., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20052730 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2006A&A...447..173P 447, 173

    2006 doi

  46. [58]

    B., S ubr L., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/751/2/133 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2012ApJ...751..133P 751, 133

    Perets H. B., S ubr L., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/751/2/133 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2012ApJ...751..133P 751, 133

    2012 doi

  47. [59]

    Perlmutter S., et al., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/307221 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1999ApJ...517..565P 517, 565

    1999 doi

  48. [60]

    M., 2017, @doi [The Journal of Open Source Software] 10.21105/joss.00388 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2017JOSS....2..388P 2, 388

    Price-Whelan A. M., 2017, @doi [The Journal of Open Source Software] 10.21105/joss.00388 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2017JOSS....2..388P 2, 388

    2017 doi

  49. [61]

    A., G \"a nsicke B

    Raddi R., Hollands M. A., G \"a nsicke B. T., Townsley D. M., Hermes J. J., Gentile Fusillo N. P., Koester D., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/sly103 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018MNRAS.479L..96R 479, L96

    2018 doi

  50. [62]

    arXiv:1902.05061

    Raddi R., et al., 2019, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190205061R p. arXiv:1902.05061

    2019 arXiv

  51. [63]

    G., et al., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/300499 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1998AJ....116.1009R 116, 1009

    Riess A. G., et al., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/300499 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1998AJ....116.1009R 116, 1009

    1998 doi

  52. [64]

    R., Cescutti G., R \"o pke F

    Seitenzahl I. R., Cescutti G., R \"o pke F. K., Ruiter A. J., Pakmor R., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322599 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2013A&A...559L...5S 559, L5

    2013 doi

  53. [65]

    J., Schwab J., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/180 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2017ApJ...834..180S 834, 180

    Shen K. J., Schwab J., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/180 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2017ApJ...834..180S 834, 180

    2017 doi

  54. [66]

    J., et al., 2018a, preprint, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018arXiv180411163S p

    Shen K. J., et al., 2018a, preprint, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018arXiv180411163S p. arXiv:1804.11163 ( @eprint arXiv 1804.11163 )

    arXiv

  55. [67]

    J., Kasen D., Miles B

    Shen K. J., Kasen D., Miles B. J., Townsley D. M., 2018b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa8de , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018ApJ...854...52S 854, 52

    doi

  56. [68]

    Tanikawa A., Nomoto K., Nakasato N., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aae9ee , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018ApJ...868...90T 868, 90

    2018 doi

  57. [69]

    M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slu189 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2015MNRAS.448L...6T 448, L6

    Tauris T. M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slu189 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2015MNRAS.448L...6T 448, L6

    2015 doi

  58. [70]

    B., 2005, in Shopbell P., Britton M., Ebert R., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol

    Taylor M. B., 2005, in Shopbell P., Britton M., Ebert R., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 347, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XIV. p. 29

    2005

  59. [71]

    C., Varoquaux G., 2011, preprint, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2011arXiv1102.1523V p

    Van Der Walt S., Colbert S. C., Varoquaux G., 2011, preprint, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2011arXiv1102.1523V p. arXiv:1102.1523 ( @eprint arXiv 1102.1523 )

    2011 arXiv

  60. [72]

    Wang B., 2018, @doi [Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1088/1674-4527/18/5/49 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2018RAA....18...49W 18, 049

    2018 doi

  61. [73]

    Wang B., Han Z., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200913326 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2009A&A...508L..27W 508, L27

    2009 doi

  62. [74]

    Wang B., Han Z., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200913976 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2010A&A...515A..88W 515, A88

    2010 doi

  63. [75]

    arXiv:1111.1503 ( @eprint arXiv 1111.1503 )

    Wang B., Han Z., 2011, preprint, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2011arXiv1111.1503W p. arXiv:1111.1503 ( @eprint arXiv 1111.1503 )

    2011 arXiv

  64. [76]

    Wang B., Han Z., 2012, @doi [New Astronomy Reviews] 10.1016/j.newar.2012.04.001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2012NewAR..56..122W 56, 122

    2012 doi

  65. [77]

    Wang B., Podsiadlowski P., Han Z., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2192 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2017MNRAS.472.1593W 472, 1593

    2017 doi

  66. [78]

    F., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1086/161701 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1984ApJ...277..355W 277, 355

    Webbink R. F., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1086/161701 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1984ApJ...277..355W 277, 355

    1984 doi

  67. [79]

    334, 14th European Workshop on White Dwarfs

    Weidemann V., 2005, in Koester D., Moehler S., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 334, 14th European Workshop on White Dwarfs. p. 15

    2005

  68. [80]

    Whelan J., Iben Icko J., 1973, @doi [ ] 10.1086/152565 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/1973ApJ...186.1007W 186, 1007

    1973 doi

  69. [81]

    Wong T. L. S., Schwab J., 2019, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190104512W p. arXiv:1901.04512

    2019 arXiv

  70. [82]

    J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aafb34 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...872...29Z 872, 29

    Zhang M., Fuller J., Schwab J., Foley R. J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aafb34 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...872...29Z 872, 29

    2019 doi

  71. [83]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.