pith. sign in

arxiv: 2403.16673 · v4 · pith:5WQCPE4Cnew · submitted 2024-03-25 · 📊 stat.ME · econ.EM

Quasi-randomization tests for network interference: a random graph approach

classification 📊 stat.ME econ.EM
keywords interferencenetworknullrandomapproachchallengeeffectsexisting
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Network interference occurs when the treatment status of one unit affects the potential outcomes of other units, giving rise to spillover effects that are difficult to test for. We propose treating the network as a random variable rather than a fixed quantity to address this challenge. This overcomes a key challenge of non-imputability of potential outcomes under the null and avoids the computational intractability of existing conditional randomization tests. Our quasi-randomization test builds the null distribution of no spillover effects using random graph null models, is exactly valid in finite samples under mild assumptions on the network-generating process, and offers substantially improved power over existing methods, particularly in cluster-randomized trials. We validate our approach via simulation and illustrate it by testing for interference in a weather insurance adoption experiment in rural China.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. On the Impossibility of Specification Testing of Interference Models Based on Exposure Mappings

    math.ST 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Any specification test for an exposure mapping model with power against a larger exposure mapping model has worst-case Type I and Type II errors summing to one; informative tests require restricting the alternative cl...

  2. On the Impossibility of Specification Testing of Interference Models Based on Exposure Mappings

    math.ST 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    No uniformly consistent specification test exists for exposure mapping models of interference, as worst-case Type I and Type II error rates must sum to one for any test.