Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 5 cited by

String Breaking in a $2+1$D $\mathbb{Z}_2$ Lattice Gauge Theory

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Deep in the confined phase, the string between two static charges in a 2+1D $\mathbb{Z}_2$ lattice gauge theory is exactly a free-fermion chain, and magnetic fluctuations stabilize it against breaking.

desk verdict Elegant free-fermion mapping for minimal strings and a clean demonstration that magnetic fluctuations stabilize strings, but the minimal-string truncation lacks a quantitative validity bound. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.17929 v1 pith:65X767CK submitted 2025-01-29 quant-ph cond-mat.str-elhep-lat

Umberto Borla , Jesse J. Osborne , Sergej Moroz , Jad C. Halimeh This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.str-elhep-lat PACS 11.15.Ha
keywords latticegaugetheoryZ2stringbreakingconfinementfreefermionmappingmatrixproductstatestoriccodequantumsimulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies the confining string that forms between two static $\mathbb{Z}_2$ charges in a 2+1D lattice gauge theory, a model recently realized on superconducting-qubit quantum computers. It argues that deep in the confined phase the string is made of the shortest possible electric flux lines, and that these configurations map exactly to noninteracting spinless fermions hopping on a one-dimensional chain, with the magnetic plaquette term as the hopping amplitude. The paper further claims that magnetic fluctuations stabilize the string, raising the critical strengths of the external fields at which the string breaks into a particle pair. If these claims hold, string physics in this experimentally accessible setting becomes quantitatively predictable: ground states are free Fermi gases, and string excitations are particle-hole pairs.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the correspondence between shortest-string configurations and occupied sites on a one-dimensional chain. Restricting to strings of minimal length $l = l_1 + l_2$ on a rectangular patch, each path is a permutation of $l_1$ horizontal and $l_2$ vertical steps; the plaquette operator $\hat{B}_{r^*}$ acts on a corner, changing a $01$ step pair into $10$, which is precisely nearest-neighbor hopping of a fermion. Thus $J_p$ is the hopping amplitude and the number of fermions $l_1$ is fixed, giving a free Fermi sea at filling $l_1/(l_1+l_2)$. The same mechanism explains the magnetic stabilization: each corner that can resonate lowers the energy, so zigzag strings with many corners dominate, and a larger $J_p$ deepens the binding energy of the string.

What would settle it

Measure the weight of string configurations longer than the minimal length at the parameters of the paper's figures; if that weight is not exponentially small, or if the particle-number jump occurs at external fields below the predicted free-fermion thresholds, the mapping and the predicted breaking points are wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, sufficiently deep inside the confined phase, the ground state of two static $\mathbb{Z}_2$ charges connected by an electric string is exactly described by a free-fermion model. Every shortest string connecting the charges on an $l_1 \times l_2$ patch is a binary word with $l_1$ horizontal and $l_2$ vertical steps; plaquette terms turn local corner flips into nearest-neighbor hoppings, so the string Hilbert space becomes an open chain of length $l_1 + l_2$ with $l_1$ fermions. The string ground state is therefore a free Fermi gas at filling $l_1/(l_1+l_2)$, and its excitations are particle-hole pairs. Magnetic fluctuations, controlled by $J_p$, act as the kinetic energy of these fermions and lower the string energy, which is why increasing $J_p$ stabilizes the string and shifts the breaking thresholds $h_x^*$ and $h_z^*$ to larger values; conversely, reducing $J_p$ below a critical value breaks the string. The paper supports this picture with matrix-product-state simulations on a cylinder and identifies three distinct breaking mechanisms: increasing the electric field $h_x$, increasing the matter coupling $h_z$, or decreasing the magnetic coupling $J_p$.

Load-bearing premise

The whole free-fermion and stabilization picture assumes that for the scanned parameters the string is always of minimal length, with no significant probability of longer strings, and no energy gap to those longer strings is computed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The string ground state in the confined phase is a free Fermi gas, so all equal-time correlations along the string are those of noninteracting one-dimensional fermions.
  • String excitations are particle-hole pairs of this Fermi gas, meaning their energies and dispersion follow from the free-fermion chain exactly.
  • The critical fields at which strings break increase with the magnetic coupling $J_p$, and equivalently decreasing $J_p$ below a critical value breaks the string at fixed $h_x$ and $h_z$.
  • In the classical limit of zero magnetic and matter couplings, the breaking threshold is $h_x^* = 2 J_s / l$, and small quantum fluctuations shift this threshold upward.
  • Strings with the most corners have the most resonances and therefore dominate the ground-state superposition, a pattern visible in the electric-field expectation values.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mapping holds on larger patches than the one simulated, the string's entanglement entropy should grow logarithmically with subsystem size, the signature of a one-dimensional Fermi gas, which could be tested with larger-scale tensor-network simulations.
  • Adding a weak interaction between gauge fluxes would turn the free fermions into a one-dimensional interacting model, so Luttinger-liquid parameters would control how string breaking thresholds shift with system size.
  • Because the matter coupling is claimed to enter only at fourth order, a testable consequence is that the Fermi momentum of the string remains $l_1/(l_1+l_2)$ while the effective fermion mass changes with $h_z$.
  • The mapping suggests a direct quantum-simulation diagnostic: prepare the confined string, measure the density profile along the string, and compare it with the known density profile of a free Fermi gas at the same filling.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies string breaking in a 2+1D Z2 lattice gauge theory with two static charges, using DMRG on cylinders of circumference Ly=6. It identifies regimes where strings break as hx or hz is increased or Jp is decreased, and argues that the plaquette term Jp has a stabilizing effect on strings, shifting the breaking thresholds upward. The central theoretical result is a mapping of the minimal-length string sector to a one-dimensional chain of free fermions, with the plaquette term playing the role of nearest-neighbor hopping and the matter coupling hz entering only at fourth order in perturbation theory. A parameter-free energy balance gives the classical critical tension hx* = 2Js/l.

Significance. If the free-fermion duality holds, it provides an exact description of string ground states (a filling l1/(l1+l2) Fermi gas) and string excitations (particle-hole pairs) in the confined phase of a 2+1D gauge theory, giving a concrete and falsifiable picture directly relevant to current quantum-simulation experiments such as the Google Quantum AI 2024 experiment. The stabilizing role of magnetic fluctuations is a crisp physical claim that can be tested both numerically and experimentally. The paper's strengths include the clean, parameter-free energy balance for hx*, the exact combinatorial mapping within the minimal sector, and the use of a standard open-source DMRG library. The main weaknesses are the absence of numerical convergence parameters and the lack of a controlled justification for the minimal-sector projection and the hz perturbation claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [String phenomenology in the confined phase] The paragraph beginning "What is the leading effect of a weak matter coupling hz?" states without derivation that hz does not split the energies of the shortest strings at second order and only renormalizes the fermion hopping at fourth order. This assertion is load-bearing for the free-fermion duality: if second-order hz processes generate diagonal potentials or density-density interactions inside the minimal sector, the free-fermion ground state and the particle-hole excitation picture fail. Please provide the perturbative calculation (in the text or a supplement) and state the small parameter. At the parameters of Figs. 3 and 4 (Js=10-15 and hz up to the breaking transition), hz^2/(4Js) is not parametrically small, so this is a quantitative gap, not just a missing detail.
  2. [String phenomenology in the confined phase] The mapping to free fermions is constructed inside the minimal-length string subspace, but the paper does not provide a gap estimate to longer strings or to matter-pair excitations. With hx=3, the cost of adding two links to a string is 4hx=12, while Jp and hz near the breaking transitions can be of order several units (and Jp is even scanned to zero in Fig. 4). Without a bound on the admixture of longer strings or hz-induced matter pairs, the claim that "deep in the confined regime the problem is dual to one-dimensional free fermions" is not quantitatively controlled. Please provide a perturbative estimate of the gap or a numerical check of the ground-state weight outside the minimal sector, and specify the control parameter for the truncation.
  3. [Numerical study of string breaking] The DMRG results in Figs. 3 and 4 are presented without any report of bond dimensions, truncation errors, or convergence criteria. Since the main quantitative conclusions (the stabilizing effect of Jp and the locations of the string-breaking transitions) rely on identifying sharp jumps in the particle number and energy, the absence of these convergence data makes it impossible to assess whether the jumps are numerically converged or artifacts of the MPS approximation. Please report the bond dimensions and truncation errors at least for parameter points near the transitions, and specify the MPS site ordering and boundary conditions used on the cylinder.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure 3 caption] The caption states that "a finite magnetic coupling Jp stabilizes the strings" but does not list the Jp values used for the different curves; please add the values or a legend.
  2. [Figure 4 caption] Panel (a) presumably plots the ground-state energy (or energy difference) as a function of Jp, but the x-axis and the plotted quantity are not explicitly named; please specify them in the caption or in the text.
  3. [String phenomenology in the confined phase] The classical prediction hx* = 2Js/l is derived for Jp = hz = 0, but Fig. 3a is computed at hz = 1. The text says the prediction is "confirmed in the presence of small quantum fluctuations generated by the plaquette term," which is inconsistent with the caption. Please clarify whether the hz=1 shift is negligible or include an hz=0 curve for a direct check.
  4. [Model] After gauge fixing, the matter coupling is written as -hz sum σ^z_{r,η} in Eq. (2). It would be helpful to state explicitly that this follows from eliminating the matter fields via Gauss's law and to specify the sign convention used, as it may affect comparisons with Refs. [65,70].
  5. [String phenomenology in the confined phase] The mapping to fermions is described qualitatively; writing the effective Hamiltonian explicitly as -Jp sum_i (c†_i c_{i+1} + h.c.) on an open chain of length L=l1+l2 with N=l1 fermions and stating the boundary conditions would make the claim more precise and easier to verify.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the free-fermion duality and the breaking threshold h_x* = 2J_s/l are derived from the Hamiltonian and lattice geometry, not fitted to simulations.

full rationale

The paper's central analytical results are self-contained. The threshold h_x* = 2J_s/l follows from a classical energy balance in the model of Eq. (2): a minimal string of length l costs 2 h_x l, while a broken string costs 4J_s, so the equality is an exact consequence of the Hamiltonian rather than a fit. The free-fermion mapping is a combinatorial equivalence defined on the minimal-string subspace: string configurations are permutations of l1 horizontal and l2 vertical moves, and the plaquette operator swaps neighboring (0,1) into (1,0), which is exactly nearest-neighbor hopping of l1 fermions on an open chain of length l1+l2; Jp appears as the hopping amplitude by direct operator action. The stabilizing effect of Jp is supported by independent DMRG scans (Figs. 3 and 4) and by a first-order resonance argument, not by fitting and then re-predicting the same curve. No parameter is fitted to data and then renamed a prediction. The statement that hz enters only at fourth order in perturbation theory is asserted without proof, which is a support gap rather than a circular step, and the absence of a gap estimate for longer strings is a robustness concern, not a definitional reduction. Self-citations appear only in contextual references (e.g., confinement reviews and the TeNPy software) and do not carry the derivation. Hence no circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to the data. The simulation couplings (Js=15, hx=3, hz=1, Jp scanned) are model inputs. The central claim rests on four unproven modeling assumptions listed above, especially the minimal-string truncation and the unstated DMRG convergence.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Deep in the confined phase, the ground state manifold is restricted to minimal-length strings connecting the two static charges.
    Used to construct the fermion mapping and to interpret the DMRG string patterns; no gap estimate to longer strings is given.
  • ad hoc to paper Weak matter coupling hz leaves the minimal-string energies unchanged at second order and renormalizes the plaquette term at fourth order.
    Stated as 'straightforward to demonstrate' without showing the calculation; it underpins the claim that hz only weakly dresses the free-fermion picture.
  • domain assumption Hamiltonian (2), obtained by integrating out matter via Gauss's law, correctly describes the string-breaking physics of the original model (1) on the cylinder away from boundaries.
    The authors note the two Hamiltonians differ in boundary and entanglement-cut aspects, but all simulations use (2).
  • domain assumption The TeNPy DMRG ground states on a 30x6 cylinder are converged for the parameter scans.
    No bond dimensions, truncation errors, or convergence tests are reported, so the numerical results rely on unstated DMRG accuracy.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of String Breaking in a $2+1$D $\mathbb{Z}_2$ Lattice Gauge Theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/65X767CK

@misc{pith2026250117929,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: String Breaking in a $2+1$D $\mathbbZ_2$ Lattice Gauge Theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/65X767CK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.17929}
}
abstract

String breaking is an intriguing phenomenon crucial to the understanding of lattice gauge theories (LGTs), with strong relevance to both condensed matter and high-energy physics (HEP). Recent experiments investigating string breaking in $2+1$D (two spatial and one temporal dimensions) LGTs motivate a thorough analysis of its underlying mechanisms. Here, we perform matrix product state (MPS) simulations of string breaking in an experimentally relevant $2+1$D $\mathbb{Z}_2$ LGT in the presence of two external charges. We provide a detailed description of the system in the confined phase, highlight a number of mechanisms which are responsible for string breaking, and argue that magnetic fluctuations have a stabilizing effect on the strings. Moreover, we show that deep in the confined regime the problem is dual to one-dimensional free fermions hopping on an open chain. Our work elucidates the microscopic processes of string breaking in $2+1$D LGTs, and our findings can be probed on current superconducting-qubit quantum computers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.17929 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Left: quantum phase diagram of the model described [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) On a 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. String breaking can be driven by decreasing the pla [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Nonlocal Nonstabilizerness from Holographic Schwinger Pair Production

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    In holographic Schwinger pair production, the excess capacity of entanglement is √λ(d−2)/(d−1)³ — positive for d>2, zero for d=2 — so the produced pair carries nonlocal magic for d>2.

  2. Ground state preparation in $(2+1)$-dimensional pure $\mathbb{Z}_2$ lattice gauge theory via deterministic quantum imaginary time evolution

    hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Deterministic QITE with a Gauss-law-reduced Pauli pool reproduces DMRG ground-state energies of (2+1)-D pure Z2 lattice gauge theory to within 0.1% for ladders of up to 32 qubits and coupling λ ∈ [0.5, 5].

  3. String Breaking Dynamics and Glueball Formation in a $2+1$D Lattice Gauge Theory

    hep-lat 2025-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a 2+1D Z2 lattice gauge theory, string breaking happens only at specific resonances set by field strength and matter mass, while long strings can dynamically form closed electric loops analogous to glueballs.

  4. Confinement and String Breaking in the Compact Abelian Higgs Model

    hep-lat 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A spin-1 qutrit lattice model with a local chemical potential yields universal linear string potentials, from which string tension, breaking length, and meson mass can be extracted by DMRG.

  5. Roughening and dynamics of an electric flux string in a (2+1)D lattice gauge theory

    hep-lat 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Numerical MPS simulations confirm static roughening signatures in a 2+1D Z2 gauge theory and show that after a local quench the entanglement entropy grows linearly in the roughening region, consistent with a massless ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields , Vol

    S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields , Vol. 2: Modern Applications (Cambridge University Press, 1995)

    1995

  2. [2]

    Gattringer and C

    C. Gattringer and C. Lang, Quantum Chromodynamics on the Lattice: An Introductory Presentation, Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009)

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    Ellis, W

    R. Ellis, W. Stirling, and B. Webber, QCD and Collider Physics, Cambridge Monographs on Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology (Cambridge University Press, 2003)

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    K. G. Wilson, Confinement of quarks, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2445 (1974)

    1974

  5. [5]

    F. J. Wegner, Duality in generalized Ising mod- els and phase transitions without local order pa- rameters, Journal of Mathematical Physics 12, 2259 (1971), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jmp/article- pdf/12/10/2259/19106483/2259 1 online.pdf

    work page 1971

  6. [6]

    J. B. Kogut, An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 659 (1979)

    1979

  7. [7]

    X. Wen, Quantum Field Theory of Many-Body Sys- tems:From the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons: From the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons, Oxford Graduate Texts (OUP Oxford, 2004)

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    Bernien, S

    H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Om- ran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Probing many- body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature 551, 579 (2017)

    2017

Show all 75 references
  1. [9]

    F. M. Surace, P. P. Mazza, G. Giudici, A. Lerose, A. Gambassi, and M. Dalmonte, Lattice gauge theories and string dynamics in Rydberg atom quantum simula- tors, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021041 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    G.-X. Su, H. Sun, A. Hudomal, J.-Y. Desaules, Z.-Y. Zhou, B. Yang, J. C. Halimeh, Z.-S. Yuan, Z. Papi´ c, and J.-W. Pan, Observation of many-body scarring in a Bose- Hubbard quantum simulator, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023010 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    Desaules, D

    J.-Y. Desaules, D. Banerjee, A. Hudomal, Z. Papi´ c, A. Sen, and J. C. Halimeh, Weak Ergodicity Break- ing in the Schwinger Model, arXiv preprint (2022), arXiv:2203.08830 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2022 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Desaules, A

    J.-Y. Desaules, A. Hudomal, D. Banerjee, A. Sen, Z. Papi´ c, and J. C. Halimeh, Prominent quantum many-body scars in a truncated Schwinger model 10.48550/ARXIV.2204.01745 (2022)

    2022 doi arXiv

  5. [13]

    E. A. Martinez, C. A. Muschik, P. Schindler, D. Nigg, A. Erhard, M. Heyl, P. Hauke, M. Dalmonte, T. Monz, P. Zoller, and R. Blatt, Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer, Na- ture 534, 516 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    N. Klco, E. F. Dumitrescu, A. J. McCaskey, T. D. Mor- ris, R. C. Pooser, M. Sanz, E. Solano, P. Lougovski, and M. J. Savage, Quantum-classical computation of Schwinger model dynamics using quantum computers, Phys. Rev. A 98, 032331 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    G¨ org, K

    F. G¨ org, K. Sandholzer, J. Minguzzi, R. Desbuquois, M. Messer, and T. Esslinger, Realization of density- dependent Peierls phases to engineer quantized gauge fields coupled to ultracold matter, Nat. Phys. 15, 1161 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    Schweizer, F

    C. Schweizer, F. Grusdt, M. Berngruber, L. Barbiero, E. Demler, N. Goldman, I. Bloch, and M. Aidelsburger, Floquet approach to Z2 lattice gauge theories with ultra- cold atoms in optical lattices, Nat. Phys.15, 1168 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    A. Mil, T. V. Zache, A. Hegde, A. Xia, R. P. Bhatt, M. K. Oberthaler, P. Hauke, J. Berges, and F. Jendrzejewski, A scalable realization of local U(1) gauge invariance in cold atomic mixtures, Science 367, 1128 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    B. Yang, H. Sun, R. Ott, H.-Y. Wang, T. V. Zache, J. C. Halimeh, Z.-S. Yuan, P. Hauke, and J.-W. Pan, Observa- tion of gauge invariance in a 71-site Bose–Hubbard quan- tum simulator, Nature 587, 392 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    Wang, Z.-Y

    Z. Wang, Z.-Y. Ge, Z. Xiang, X. Song, R.-Z. Huang, P. Song, X.-Y. Guo, L. Su, K. Xu, D. Zheng, and H. Fan, Observation of emergent Z2 gauge invariance in a su- perconducting circuit, Phys. Rev. Research 4, L022060 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Zhou, G.-X

    Z.-Y. Zhou, G.-X. Su, J. C. Halimeh, R. Ott, H. Sun, P. Hauke, B. Yang, Z.-S. Yuan, J. Berges, and J.-W. Pan, Thermalization dynamics of a gauge theory on a quantum simulator, Science 377, 311 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Wang, W.-Y

    H.-Y. Wang, W.-Y. Zhang, Z. Yao, Y. Liu, Z.-H. Zhu, Y.- G. Zheng, X.-K. Wang, H. Zhai, Z.-S. Yuan, and J.-W. Pan, Interrelated thermalization and quantum criticality in a lattice gauge simulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 050401 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Zhang, Y

    W.-Y. Zhang, Y. Liu, Y. Cheng, M.-G. He, H.-Y. Wang, T.-Y. Wang, Z.-H. Zhu, G.-X. Su, Z.-Y. Zhou, Y.-G. Zheng, H. Sun, B. Yang, P. Hauke, W. Zheng, J. C. Halimeh, Z.-S. Yuan, and J.-W. Pan, Observation of mi- croscopic confinement dynamics by a tunable topologi- cal θ-angle, N...

    2024 doi

  15. [23]

    Z.-H. Zhu, Y. Liu, G. Lagnese, F. M. Surace, W.-Y. Zhang, M.-G. He, J. C. Halimeh, M. Dalmonte, S. C. Morampudi, F. Wilczek, Z.-S. Yuan, and J.-W. Pan, Probing false vacuum decay on a cold-atom gauge-theory quantum simulator, (2024), arXiv:2411.12565 [cond- mat.quant-gas]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Dalmonte and S

    M. Dalmonte and S. Montangero, Lattice gauge theory simulations in the quantum informa- tion era, Contemporary Physics 57, 388 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1080/00107514.2016.1151199

    2016

  17. [25]

    M. C. Ba˜ nuls, R. Blatt, J. Catani, A. Celi, J. I. Cirac, M. Dalmonte, L. Fallani, K. Jansen, M. Lewenstein, S. Montangero, C. A. Muschik, B. Reznik, E. Rico, L. Tagliacozzo, K. Van Acoleyen, F. Verstraete, U.-J. Wiese, M. Wingate, J. Zakrzewski, and P. Zoller, Sim- ulating l...

    2020

  18. [26]

    Zohar, J

    E. Zohar, J. I. Cirac, and B. Reznik, Quantum simula- tions of lattice gauge theories using ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 014401 (2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    Alexeev, D

    Y. Alexeev, D. Bacon, K. R. Brown, R. Calderbank, L. D. Carr, F. T. Chong, B. DeMarco, D. Englund, E. Farhi, B. Fefferman, A. V. Gorshkov, A. Houck, J. Kim, S. Kim- mel, M. Lange, S. Lloyd, M. D. Lukin, D. Maslov, P. Maunz, C. Monroe, J. Preskill, M. Roetteler, M. J. Savage, a...

    2021

  20. [28]

    Aidelsburger, L

    M. Aidelsburger, L. Barbiero, A. Bermudez, T. Chanda, A. Dauphin, D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, P. R. Grzybowski, S. Hands, F. Jendrzejewski, J. J¨ unemann, G. Juzeli¯ unas, V. Kasper, A. Piga, S.-J. Ran, M. Rizzi, G. Sierra, L. Tagliacozzo, E. Tirrito, T. V. Zache, J. Zakrzewski, E. ...

    2022

  21. [29]

    Zohar, Quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories in more than one space dimension—requirements, chal- lenges and methods, Philos

    E. Zohar, Quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories in more than one space dimension—requirements, chal- lenges and methods, Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. A 380, 20210069 (2022), arXiv:2106.04609 [quant-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [30]

    N. Klco, A. Roggero, and M. J. Savage, Standard model physics and the digital quantum revolution: thoughts about the interface, Reports on Progress in Physics 85, 064301 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    C. W. Bauer, Z. Davoudi, A. B. Balantekin, T. Bhat- tacharya, M. Carena, W. A. de Jong, P. Draper, A. El-Khadra, N. Gemelke, M. Hanada, D. Kharzeev, H. Lamm, Y.-Y. Li, J. Liu, M. Lukin, Y. Meurice, C. Monroe, B. Nachman, G. Pagano, J. Preskill, E. Ri- naldi, A. Roggero, D. I. ...

    2023

  24. [32]

    Di Meglio, K

    A. Di Meglio, K. Jansen, I. Tavernelli, C. Alexandrou, S. Arunachalam, C. W. Bauer, K. Borras, S. Carrazza, A. Crippa, V. Croft, R. de Putter, A. Delgado, V. Dun- jko, D. J. Egger, E. Fern´ andez-Combarro, E. Fuchs, L. Funcke, D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, M. Grossi, J. C. Hal- imeh, ...

    2024

  25. [33]

    Cheng and H

    Y. Cheng and H. Zhai, Emergent U (1) lattice gauge the- ory in Rydberg atom arrays, Nature Reviews Physics 6, 566 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    J. C. Halimeh, M. Aidelsburger, F. Grusdt, P. Hauke, and B. Yang, Cold-atom quantum simulators of gauge theo- ries, Nature Physics 10.1038/s41567-024-02721-8 (2025)

    2025 doi

  27. [35]

    Borla, R

    U. Borla, R. Verresen, F. Grusdt, and S. Moroz, Confined phases of one-dimensional spinless fermions coupled toZ2 gauge theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 120503 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, L

    D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, L. Tagliacozzo, M. Lewenstein, and A. Bermudez, Robust topological order in fermionic Z2 gauge theories: From aharonov-bohm instability to soliton-induced deconfinement, Phys. Rev. X 10, 041007 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    M. c. v. Kebriˇ c, L. Barbiero, C. Reinmoser, U. Schollw¨ ock, and F. Grusdt, Confinement and Mott transitions of dynamical charges in one-dimensional lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 167203 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    Homeier, A

    L. Homeier, A. Bohrdt, S. Linsel, E. Demler, J. C. Hal- imeh, and F. Grusdt, Realistic scheme for quantum simu- lation of Z2 lattice gauge theories with dynamical matter in 2 + 1d, Commun. Phys. 6, 127 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Fromm, O

    M. Fromm, O. Philipsen, M. Spannowsky, and C. Win- terowd, Simulating Z2 lattice gauge theory with the vari- ational quantum thermalizer, EPJ Quantum Technology 11, 20 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    M. c. v. Kebriˇ c, J. C. Halimeh, U. Schollw¨ ock, and F. Grusdt, Confinement in (1 + 1)-dimensional Z2 lat- tice gauge theories at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. B 109, 245110 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    S. M. Linsel, A. Bohrdt, L. Homeier, L. Pollet, and F. Grusdt, Percolation as a confinement order parameter in Z2 lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. B 110, L241101 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    F. F. Assaad and T. Grover, Simple fermionic model of deconfined phases and phase transitions, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041049 (2016)

    2016

  35. [43]

    Gazit, F

    S. Gazit, F. F. Assaad, S. Sachdev, A. Vishwanath, and C. Wang, Confinement transition of Z2 gauge theories coupled to massless fermions: Emergent quantum chro- modynamics and SO(5) symmetry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, E6987 (2018)

    2018

  36. [44]

    E. J. K¨ onig, P. Coleman, and A. M. Tsvelik, Soluble limit and criticality of fermions in Z2 gauge theories, Phys. Rev. B 102, 155143 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    A. M. Somoza, P. Serna, and A. Nahum, Self-dual criti- cality in three-dimensional Z2 gauge theory with matter, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041008 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    Borla, S

    U. Borla, S. Gazit, and S. Moroz, Deconfined quantum criticality in Ising gauge theory entangled with single- component fermions, Phys. Rev. B 110, L201110 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    W.-T. Xu, F. Pollmann, and M. Knap, Critical behavior of the Fredenhagen-Marcu order parameter at topolog- ical phase transitions, (2024), arXiv:2402.00127 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Borla, R

    U. Borla, R. Verresen, J. Shah, and S. Moroz, Gauging the Kitaev chain, SciPost Phys. 10, 148 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    Verresen, U

    R. Verresen, U. Borla, A. Vishwanath, S. Moroz, and R. Thorngren, Higgs condensates are symmetry- 7 protected topological phases: I. discrete symmetries, arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.01376 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Iadecola and M

    T. Iadecola and M. Schecter, Quantum many-body scar states with emergent kinetic constraints and finite- entanglement revivals, Phys. Rev. B 101, 024306 (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    A. S. Aramthottil, U. Bhattacharya, D. Gonz´ alez- Cuadra, M. Lewenstein, L. Barbiero, and J. Zakrzewski, Scar states in deconfined Z2 lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. B 106, L041101 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    Desaules, T

    J.-Y. Desaules, T. Iadecola, and J. C. Halimeh, Mass- assisted local deconfinement in a confined Z2 lat- tice gauge theory, (2024), arXiv:2404.11645 [cond- mat.quant-gas]

    2024 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Mildenberger, W

    J. Mildenberger, W. Mruczkiewicz, J. C. Halimeh, Z. Jiang, and P. Hauke, Confinement in a Z2 lattice gauge theory on a quantum computer, Nature Physics 10.1038/s41567-024-02723-6 (2025)

    2025 doi

  46. [54]

    A. De, A. Lerose, D. Luo, F. M. Surace, A. Schuckert, E. R. Bennewitz, B. Ware, W. Morong, K. S. Collins, Z. Davoudi, A. V. Gorshkov, O. Katz, and C. Monroe, Observation of string-breaking dynamics in a quantum simulator, (2024), arXiv:2410.13815 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    T. A. Cochran, B. Jobst, E. Rosenberg, Y. D. Lensky, G. Gyawali, N. Eassa, M. Will, D. Abanin, R. Acharya, L. A. Beni, T. I. Andersen, M. Ansmann, F. Arute, K. Arya, A. Asfaw, J. Atalaya, R. Babbush, B. Ballard, J. C. Bardin, A. Bengtsson, A. Bilmes, A. Bourassa, J. Bovaird, M...

    2024 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Gyawali, T

    G. Gyawali, T. Cochran, Y. Lensky, E. Rosenberg, A. H. Karamlou, K. Kechedzhi, J. Berndtsson, T. Westerhout, A. Asfaw, D. Abanin, R. Acharya, L. A. Beni, T. I. An- dersen, M. Ansmann, F. Arute, K. Arya, N. Astrakhant- sev, J. Atalaya, R. Babbush, B. Ballard, J. C. Bardin, A. B...

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Gonzalez-Cuadra, M

    D. Gonzalez-Cuadra, M. Hamdan, T. V. Zache, B. Braverman, M. Kornjaca, A. Lukin, S. H. Cantu, F. Liu, S.-T. Wang, A. Keesling, M. D. Lukin, P. Zoller, and A. Bylinskii, Observation of string breaking on a (2 + 1)d Rydberg quantum simulator, (2024), 8 arXiv:2410.16558 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Liu, W.-Y

    Y. Liu, W.-Y. Zhang, Z.-H. Zhu, M.-G. He, Z.-S. Yuan, and J.-W. Pan, String breaking mechanism in a lattice schwinger model simulator, (2024), arXiv:2411.15443 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Crippa, K

    A. Crippa, K. Jansen, and E. Rinaldi, Analysis of the con- finement string in (2 + 1)-dimensional quantum electro- dynamics with a trapped-ion quantum computer, (2024), arXiv:2411.05628 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Gross and W

    C. Gross and W. S. Bakr, Quantum gas microscopy for single atom and spin detection, Nat. Phys. 17, 1316 (2021)

    2021

  53. [61]

    Berges, M

    J. Berges, M. P. Heller, A. Mazeliauskas, and R. Venu- gopalan, QCD thermalization: Ab initio approaches and interdisciplinary connections, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 035003 (2021)

    2021

  54. [62]

    Verdel, F

    R. Verdel, F. Liu, S. Whitsitt, A. V. Gorshkov, and M. Heyl, Real-time dynamics of string breaking in quan- tum spin chains, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014308 (2020)

    2020

  55. [63]

    Verdel, G.-Y

    R. Verdel, G.-Y. Zhu, and M. Heyl, Dynamical localiza- tion transition of string breaking in quantum spin chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 230402 (2023)

    2023

  56. [64]

    Mallick, M

    A. Mallick, M. Lewenstein, J. Zakrzewski, and M. P lodzie´ n, String breaking dynamics in Ising chain with local vibrations, (2024), arXiv:2501.00604 [quant- ph]

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Fradkin and S

    E. Fradkin and S. H. Shenker, Phase diagrams of lattice gauge theories with Higgs fields, Phys. Rev. D 19, 3682 (1979)

    1979

  58. [66]

    Trebst, P

    S. Trebst, P. Werner, M. Troyer, K. Shtengel, and C. Nayak, Breakdown of a topological phase: Quantum phase transition in a loop gas model with tension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 070602 (2007)

    2007

  59. [67]

    Vidal, S

    J. Vidal, S. Dusuel, and K. P. Schmidt, Low-energy effec- tive theory of the toric code model in a parallel magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 79, 033109 (2009)

    2009

  60. [69]

    Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann

    U. Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann. Phys. 326, 96 (2011), january 2011 Special Issue

    2011

  61. [70]

    I. S. Tupitsyn, A. Kitaev, N. V. Prokof’ev, and P. C. E. Stamp, Topological multicritical point in the phase dia- gram of the toric code model and three-dimensional lat- tice gauge Higgs model, Phys. Rev. B 82, 085114 (2010)

    2010

  62. [71]

    W.-T. Xu, T. Rakovszky, M. Knap, and F. Pollmann, Entanglement properties of gauge theories from higher- form symmetries, Phys. Rev. X 15, 011001 (2025)

    2025

  63. [72]

    F. Wu, Y. Deng, and N. Prokof’ev, Phase diagram of the toric code model in a parallel magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 85, 195104 (2012)

    2012

  64. [73]

    Fradkin, Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics, Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    E. Fradkin, Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics, Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    2013

  65. [74]

    M. E. Peskin, Critical point behavior of the Wilson loop, Physics Letters B 94, 161 (1980)

    1980

  66. [75]

    Hauschild and F

    J. Hauschild and F. Pollmann, Efficient numerical sim- ulations with Tensor Networks: Tensor Network Python (TeNPy), SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 5 (2018)

    2018

  67. [76]

    Hauschild, J

    J. Hauschild, J. Unfried, S. Anand, B. Andrews, M. Bintz, U. Borla, S. Divic, M. Drescher, J. Geiger, M. Hefel, K. H´ emery, W. Kadow, J. Kemp, N. Kirchner, V. S. Liu, G. M¨ oller, D. Parker, M. Rader, A. Romen, S. Scalet, L. Schoonderwoerd, M. Schulz, T. Soejima, P. Thoma, Y....

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.