pith. sign in

arxiv: 2007.07588 · v1 · pith:6GHRP7MJnew · submitted 2020-07-15 · 💻 cs.LG · stat.ML

Importance of Tuning Hyperparameters of Machine Learning Algorithms

classification 💻 cs.LG stat.ML
keywords defaulthyperparametertuningvaluedeterminehyperparametersalgorithmsimportance
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The performance of many machine learning algorithms depends on their hyperparameter settings. The goal of this study is to determine whether it is important to tune a hyperparameter or whether it can be safely set to a default value. We present a methodology to determine the importance of tuning a hyperparameter based on a non-inferiority test and tuning risk: the performance loss that is incurred when a hyperparameter is not tuned, but set to a default value. Because our methods require the notion of a default parameter, we present a simple procedure that can be used to determine reasonable default parameters. We apply our methods in a benchmark study using 59 datasets from OpenML. Our results show that leaving particular hyperparameters at their default value is non-inferior to tuning these hyperparameters. In some cases, leaving the hyperparameter at its default value even outperforms tuning it using a search procedure with a limited number of iterations.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Knowing in Advance When an Evolutionary Outer Loop Will Not Help: A Pre-Registered Cheap-Baseline Screening Rule

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A screening rule skips evolutionary outer loops when the ratio of best single-shot gain to best cheap gain meets or exceeds 90%, validated on pre-registered lab cases where the gate fired and loops were abandoned.

  2. I see artifacts: ICA-based EEG artifact removal does not improve deep network decoding across three BCI tasks

    cs.HC 2026-05 conditional novelty 4.0

    ICA-based artifact removal does not consistently improve deep network decoding performance on EEG data across three BCI tasks and multiple models.