Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Understanding Figurative Meaning through Explainable Visual Entailment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.01474 v3 pith:6H2ZMXSK submitted 2024-05-02 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CV
keywords figurativemeaningvisualcaptionentailmentimageimagesmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in tasks requiring a fine-grained understanding of literal meaning in images and text, such as visual question-answering or visual entailment. However, there has been little exploration of the capabilities of these models when presented with images and captions containing figurative meaning, such as metaphors or humor. To close this gap, we propose a new task framing the figurative meaning understanding problem as an explainable visual entailment task, where the model has to predict whether the image (premise) entails a caption (hypothesis) and justify the predicted label with a textual explanation. The figurative phenomena can be present in the image, in the caption, or both. Using a human-AI collaboration approach, we build the accompanying expert-verified dataset V-FLUTE, containing 6,027 {image, caption, label, explanation} instances spanning five diverse figurative phenomena: metaphors, similes, idioms, sarcasm, and humor. Through automatic evaluation, we find that VLMs struggle to generalize from literal to figurative meaning, particularly when it is present in images. Further, we identify common types of errors in VLM reasoning (hallucination and incomplete or unsound reasoning) across classes of models via human evaluation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Large Vision-Language Models for Knowledge-Grounded Data Annotation of Memes

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CM50, a 33k-meme dataset with GPT-4o-generated annotations, and mtrCLIP, a fine-tuned CLIP model, together improve meme-text retrieval on MemeCap over the original CLIP.

Pith tools