Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

LawSum: A weakly supervised approach for Indian Legal Document Summarization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.01188 v3 pith:6HDUNWMK submitted 2021-10-04 cs.CL cs.AIcs.IR

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.IR
keywords legaldatasetindianjudgementsentencecommondatedelivered
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Unlike the courts in western countries, public records of Indian judiciary are completely unstructured and noisy. No large scale publicly available annotated datasets of Indian legal documents exist till date. This limits the scope for legal analytics research. In this work, we propose a new dataset consisting of over 10,000 judgements delivered by the supreme court of India and their corresponding hand written summaries. The proposed dataset is pre-processed by normalising common legal abbreviations, handling spelling variations in named entities, handling bad punctuations and accurate sentence tokenization. Each sentence is tagged with their rhetorical roles. We also annotate each judgement with several attributes like date, names of the plaintiffs, defendants and the people representing them, judges who delivered the judgement, acts/statutes that are cited and the most common citations used to refer the judgement. Further, we propose an automatic labelling technique for identifying sentences which have summary worthy information. We demonstrate that this auto labeled data can be used effectively to train a weakly supervised sentence extractor with high accuracy. Some possible applications of this dataset besides legal document summarization can be in retrieval, citation analysis and prediction of decisions by a particular judge.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Comprehensive Survey on Legal Summarization: Challenges and Future Directions

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A systematic survey of legal summarization finds a field dominated by English common-law datasets, ROUGE-based evaluation, and few human or expert validation studies.

Pith tools