Guidance on the Safety Assurance of Autonomous Systems in Complex Environments (SACE)
read the original abstract
Autonomous systems (AS) are systems that have the capability to take decisions free from direct human control. AS are increasingly being considered for adoption for applications where their behaviour may cause harm, such as when used for autonomous driving, medical applications or in domestic environments. For such applications, being able to ensure and demonstrate (assure) the safety of the operation of the AS is crucial for their adoption. This can be particularly challenging where AS operate in complex and changing real-world environments. Establishing justified confidence in the safety of AS requires the creation of a compelling safety case. This document introduces a methodology for the Safety Assurance of Autonomous Systems in Complex Environments (SACE). SACE comprises a set of safety case patterns and a process for (1) systematically integrating safety assurance into the development of the AS and (2) for generating the evidence base for explicitly justifying the acceptable safety of the AS.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Approaching Safety-Argumentation-by-Design: A Requirement-based Safety Argumentation Life Cycle for Automated Vehicles
Introduces a requirement-based safety argumentation life cycle to promote co-development of automated vehicle systems and their safety arguments from the start.
-
AI Assurance in UK Defence: Challenges in Operationalising JSP 936
A structured review of JSP 936 identifies eight challenge areas in operationalising AI assurance for UK Defence and concludes that further methods, guidance, and organisational capability are required.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.