REVIEW 2 cited by
Cross-Domain Audio Deepfake Detection: Dataset and Analysis
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Audio deepfake detection (ADD) is essential for preventing the misuse of synthetic voices that may infringe on personal rights and privacy. Recent zero-shot text-to-speech (TTS) models pose higher risks as they can clone voices with a single utterance. However, the existing ADD datasets are outdated, leading to suboptimal generalization of detection models. In this paper, we construct a new cross-domain ADD dataset comprising over 300 hours of speech data that is generated by five advanced zero-shot TTS models. To simulate real-world scenarios, we employ diverse attack methods and audio prompts from different datasets. Experiments show that, through novel attack-augmented training, the Wav2Vec2-large and Whisper-medium models achieve equal error rates of 4.1\% and 6.5\% respectively. Additionally, we demonstrate our models' outstanding few-shot ADD ability by fine-tuning with just one minute of target-domain data. Nonetheless, neural codec compressors greatly affect the detection accuracy, necessitating further research.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
SpeechFake: A Large-Scale Multilingual Speech Deepfake Dataset Incorporating Cutting-Edge Generation Methods
SpeechFake is a large-scale multilingual deepfake speech dataset with baseline experiments showing improved generalization to unseen generation methods.
-
Few-Shot Speech Deepfake Detection Adaptation with Gaussian Processes
ADD-GP, a Gaussian Process classifier with XLS-R speech embeddings, adapts to unseen TTS models with as few as 5 samples and achieves state-of-the-art low error rates on the new LibriFake benchmark.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.