REVIEW 1 cited by
DarkBench: Benchmarking Dark Patterns in Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We introduce DarkBench, a comprehensive benchmark for detecting dark design patterns--manipulative techniques that influence user behavior--in interactions with large language models (LLMs). Our benchmark comprises 660 prompts across six categories: brand bias, user retention, sycophancy, anthropomorphism, harmful generation, and sneaking. We evaluate models from five leading companies (OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, Mistral, Google) and find that some LLMs are explicitly designed to favor their developers' products and exhibit untruthful communication, among other manipulative behaviors. Companies developing LLMs should recognize and mitigate the impact of dark design patterns to promote more ethical AI.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Prevalence of Security and Privacy Risk-Inducing Usage of AI-based Conversational Agents
Roughly a third of UK adults use AI chatbots weekly, and among them a substantial minority upload untrusted content, connect bots to other programs, share sensitive data, or attempt jailbreaks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.