Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

DarkBench: Benchmarking Dark Patterns in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.10728 v1 pith:7EAMDZJZ submitted 2025-03-13 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CY

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CY
keywords darkllmsmodelsbenchmarkcompaniesdarkbenchdesignlanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce DarkBench, a comprehensive benchmark for detecting dark design patterns--manipulative techniques that influence user behavior--in interactions with large language models (LLMs). Our benchmark comprises 660 prompts across six categories: brand bias, user retention, sycophancy, anthropomorphism, harmful generation, and sneaking. We evaluate models from five leading companies (OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, Mistral, Google) and find that some LLMs are explicitly designed to favor their developers' products and exhibit untruthful communication, among other manipulative behaviors. Companies developing LLMs should recognize and mitigate the impact of dark design patterns to promote more ethical AI.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Prevalence of Security and Privacy Risk-Inducing Usage of AI-based Conversational Agents

    cs.CR 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Roughly a third of UK adults use AI chatbots weekly, and among them a substantial minority upload untrusted content, connect bots to other programs, share sensitive data, or attempt jailbreaks.

Pith tools