Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

A Survey of Stance Detection on Social Media: New Directions and Perspectives

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.15690 v2 pith:7G5U6GW6 submitted 2024-09-24 cs.CL cs.IRcs.SI

classification cs.CLcs.IRcs.SI
keywords detectionstancesocialmediaincludingmodelssurveycomputing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In modern digital environments, users frequently express opinions on contentious topics, providing a wealth of information on prevailing attitudes. The systematic analysis of these opinions offers valuable insights for decision-making in various sectors, including marketing and politics. As a result, stance detection has emerged as a crucial subfield within affective computing, enabling the automatic detection of user stances in social media conversations and providing a nuanced understanding of public sentiment on complex issues. Recent years have seen a surge of research interest in developing effective stance detection methods, with contributions from multiple communities, including natural language processing, web science, and social computing. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of stance detection techniques on social media, covering task definitions, datasets, approaches, and future works. We review traditional stance detection models, as well as state-of-the-art methods based on large language models, and discuss their strengths and limitations. Our survey highlights the importance of stance detection in understanding public opinion and sentiment, and identifies gaps in current research. We conclude by outlining potential future directions for stance detection on social media, including the need for more robust and generalizable models, and the importance of addressing emerging challenges such as multi-modal stance detection and stance detection in low-resource languages.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MT2-CSD: A New Dataset and Multi-Semantic Knowledge Fusion Method for Conversational Stance Detection

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper presents a large new English conversational stance detection dataset and a model that fuses LLM-generated relation and act knowledge, reporting state-of-the-art F1.

  2. Quantifying Political Partisanship for Cross-Platform Analyses

    cs.SI 2026-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Partisanship of individual posts can be scored on a common embedding axis anchored by AllSides news-bias labels, yielding cross-platform scores that transfer from Bluesky/Truth Social to X.

  3. PolitiSky24: U.S. Political Bluesky Dataset with User Stance Labels

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    PolitiSky24 provides 16,044 AI-labeled user-level stance pairs for Trump and Harris from 8,467 Bluesky users, with the labeling pipeline reporting 81% validation accuracy.

Pith tools