A Comprehensive Survey of Contamination Detection Methods in Large Language Models
read the original abstract
With the rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) in recent years, abundant new opportunities are emerging, but also new challenges, among which contamination is quickly becoming critical. Business applications and fundraising in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have reached a scale at which a few percentage points gained on popular question-answering benchmarks could translate into dozens of millions of dollars, placing high pressure on model integrity. At the same time, it is becoming harder and harder to keep track of the data that LLMs have seen; if not impossible with closed-source models like GPT-4 and Claude-3 not divulging any information on the training set. As a result, contamination becomes a major issue: LLMs' performance may not be reliable anymore, as the high performance may be at least partly due to their previous exposure to the data. This limitation jeopardizes real capability improvement in the field of NLP, yet, there remains a lack of methods on how to efficiently detect contamination. In this paper, we survey all recent work on contamination detection with LLMs, analyzing their methodologies and use cases to shed light on the appropriate usage of contamination detection methods. Our work calls the NLP research community's attention into systematically taking into account contamination bias in LLM evaluation.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Representational Depth of Evaluation Awareness Shifts With Scale in Open-Weight Language Models
In Qwen 2.5 and Gemma 2 families, the layer where evaluation awareness is most linearly recoverable shifts from late layers in small models to early layers in large models.
-
TRACER: A Semantic-Aware Framework for Fine-Grained Contamination Detection in Code LLMs
TRACER presents a semantic-aware framework and the first benchmark for fine-grained code contamination detection across three levels of overlap, reporting F1 scores of 0.91-0.92 and large gains over prior methods.
-
Pretraining Data Exposure in Large Language Models: A Survey of Membership Inference, Data Contamination, and Security Implications
First unified survey formalizing Pretraining Data Exposure across exposure levels and reviewing attack, defense, and contamination methods for LLMs.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.