REVIEW 6 cited by
A Comprehensive Survey on Multi-Agent Cooperative Decision-Making: Scenarios, Approaches, Challenges and Perspectives
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
With the rapid development of artificial intelligence, intelligent decision-making techniques have gradually surpassed human levels in various human-machine competitions, especially in complex multi-agent cooperative task scenarios. Multi-agent cooperative decision-making involves multiple agents working together to complete established tasks and achieve specific objectives. These techniques are widely applicable in real-world scenarios such as autonomous driving, drone navigation, disaster rescue, and simulated military confrontations. This paper begins with a comprehensive survey of the leading simulation environments and platforms used for multi-agent cooperative decision-making. Specifically, we provide an in-depth analysis for these simulation environments from various perspectives, including task formats, reward allocation, and the underlying technologies employed. Subsequently, we provide a comprehensive overview of the mainstream intelligent decision-making approaches, algorithms and models for multi-agent systems (MAS). Theseapproaches can be broadly categorized into five types: rule-based (primarily fuzzy logic), game theory-based, evolutionary algorithms-based, deep multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL)-based, and large language models(LLMs)reasoning-based. Given the significant advantages of MARL andLLMs-baseddecision-making methods over the traditional rule, game theory, and evolutionary algorithms, this paper focuses on these multi-agent methods utilizing MARL and LLMs-based techniques. We provide an in-depth discussion of these approaches, highlighting their methodology taxonomies, advantages, and drawbacks. Further, several prominent research directions in the future and potential challenges of multi-agent cooperative decision-making are also detailed.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Aggregate in the Advantage, Not the Ratio: A Canonical-Form Analysis of Cooperative Multi-Agent Policy Optimization
For cooperative PPO, the expected gradient at the on-policy point depends on advantage and ratio aggregation supports only through their matrix product, and the variance-optimal design keeps the ratio per-agent and ag...
-
Bridging MARL to SARL: An Order-Independent Multi-Agent Transformer via Latent Consensus
CMAT uses a transformer decoder to produce a high-level consensus vector in latent space, enabling simultaneous order-independent actions by all agents and optimization via single-agent PPO, with superior results on S...
-
Hierarchical Message-Passing Policies for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
A feudal hierarchical MARL method where lower-level policies are rewarded with the upper level's advantage function, with theoretical alignment guarantees and strong benchmark results.
-
RideGym: A Standardized Interface for Real-World Large-Scale Ride-Sharing System
RideGym provides the first open, algorithm-agnostic Gym interface for large-scale ride-sharing order dispatch and shows exploration noise can reverse MARL performance rankings.
-
Toward Edge General Intelligence with Agentic AI and Agentification: Concepts, Technologies, and Future Directions
A survey that organizes agentic AI for 6G edge networks into four pillars, compactness, efficiency, knowledge and reasoning, and migration, and illustrates them with prior case studies.
-
DIANOIA: Diagnostic Decomposition and Joint Optimization for Multi-Agent Reasoning
Multi-agent reasoning gains can be written as coverage × selection accuracy, which is a conditioning identity rather than a new decomposition; the PRISM system still shows moderate benchmark gains.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.