REVIEW 6 cited by
Unveiling the Statistical Foundations of Chain-of-Thought Prompting Methods
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting and its variants have gained popularity as effective methods for solving multi-step reasoning problems using pretrained large language models (LLMs). In this work, we analyze CoT prompting from a statistical estimation perspective, providing a comprehensive characterization of its sample complexity. To this end, we introduce a multi-step latent variable model that encapsulates the reasoning process, where the latent variable encodes the task information. Under this framework, we demonstrate that when the pretraining dataset is sufficiently large, the estimator formed by CoT prompting is equivalent to a Bayesian estimator. This estimator effectively solves the multi-step reasoning problem by aggregating a posterior distribution inferred from the demonstration examples in the prompt. Moreover, we prove that the statistical error of the CoT estimator can be decomposed into two main components: (i) a prompting error, which arises from inferring the true task using CoT prompts, and (ii) the statistical error of the pretrained LLM. We establish that, under appropriate assumptions, the prompting error decays exponentially to zero as the number of demonstrations increases. Additionally, we explicitly characterize the approximation and generalization errors of the pretrained LLM. Notably, we construct a transformer model that approximates the target distribution of the multi-step reasoning problem with an error that decreases exponentially in the number of transformer blocks. Our analysis extends to other variants of CoT, including Self-Consistent CoT, Tree-of-Thought, and Selection-Inference, offering a broad perspective on the efficacy of these methods. We also provide numerical experiments to validate the theoretical findings.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Metastable Dynamics of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: Provable Benefits of Search, RL and Distillation
In a metastable Markov model of reasoning, search and RL improve hitting times by boosting rare hard edges, and distilling clusters into a meta-chain preserves escape dynamics.
-
Supervised Fine-Tuning vs. In-Context Learning: An Equilibrium Analysis of LLM Personalization under Congestion
In a linear model of LLM personalization with shared compute, SFT beats ICL above a coverage-dependent signal-to-noise threshold, congestion can reverse that ranking, and adding SFT never reduces platform profit.
-
Transformers with RL or SFT Provably Learn Sparse Boolean Functions, But Differently
Under hand-designed masks and task-specific activations, RL fine-tuning learns a k-sparse Boolean reasoning chain in one gradient update while SFT learns it one CoT step per update.
-
Towards Theoretical Understanding of Transformer Test-Time Computing: Investigation on In-Context Linear Regression
A one-layer linear-attention transformer implementing noisy gradient descent gives provable bounds showing linear noise plus ensembling avoids label-noise overfitting, and majority voting beats greedy decoding in spar...
-
CoT Information: Improved Sample Complexity under Chain-of-Thought Supervision
With chain-of-thought supervision, the PAC sample complexity is roughly d divided by the CoT information, which can be much larger than the target error epsilon.
-
Optimal Self-Consistency for Efficient Reasoning with Large Language Models
Self-consistency error decays exponentially per question at a rate set by the margin between the top two answers, aggregates to power-law scaling over datasets, and the proposed Blend-ASC delivers the reported sample-...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.