Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Pointwise dispersive estimates for Schrodinger and wave equations in a conical singular space

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read On product cones, if the cross-section has no conjugate point pairs within distance $\pi$, the Schr\"odinger and half-wave kernels obey Euclidean-type pointwise decay.

desk verdict A substantial, plausible result with a real but likely fixable gap in the non-distance sheet analysis; deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16029 v2 pith:AMLQS4XR submitted 2024-11-25 math.AP math.DGmath.SP

Qiuye Jia , Junyong Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath.DGmath.SP MSC 35Q4135L0558J40
keywords pointwisedispersiveestimatesproductconesSchrodingerpropagatorhalf-waveconjugateradiusHadamardparametrixinverse-squarepotentialconicalsingularspaces
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that the Schr\"odinger propagator and the half-wave propagator on an $n$-dimensional product cone satisfy the same pointwise decay in time as in Euclidean space, provided the cross-section $Y$ has no conjugate point pair within distance $\pi$. The estimate is uniform in the radial variables and involves a factor $(r_1r_2/2t)^{-(n-2)/2+\nu_0}$ only when $r_1r_2/(2|t|)\ll 1$, where $\nu_0$ is the positive square root of the smallest eigenvalue of the angular operator $P=\Delta_h+V_0+(n-2)^2/4$. If true, this gives pointwise dispersive bounds for general closed cross-sections and identifies $\pi$ as a natural threshold separating decay from counterexamples on spheres of radius smaller than 1.

What carries the argument

The engine is a modified Hadamard parametrix for $\cos(s\sqrt P)$ and for the Poisson-wave operator $e^{(-s\pm i\pi)\sqrt P}$ on $Y$, valid for $0\le s\le \pi$ even when the exponential map is not injective. Proposition 3.2 uses $R_{\mathrm{Conj}}>\pi$ to make $\exp_{y_0}$ a local covering map on a ball of radius $\pi+\epsilon$, and Corollary 3.6 writes the cosine kernel as a finite sum over the distance spectrum $D(y_1,y_2)$ of geodesics of length below $\pi+\epsilon$. Lemma 3.7 matches the jets of the two parametrices at $s=\pi$ and $\tilde s=0$, so that the boundary singularity of the oscillatory integral $I_{GD}$ cancels; this matching identity (3.37) is what converts the exact Bessel representation of the kernel into a bounded oscillatory integral.

What would settle it

Compute the Schr\"odinger kernel (2.1) on the cone over $Y=S^{n-1}_\sigma$ with $\sigma<1$ under the same positivity assumption on $P$, and check whether the bound (1.8) remains true; a counterexample in this regime has already been reported, so a direct kernel computation would settle whether the $R_{\mathrm{Conj}}>\pi$ condition is necessary. Alternatively, on any $Y$ with a geodesic loop of length $d\in(\pi,\pi+\epsilon)$, evaluate $I_{GD}$ from (4.8) and verify that the cancellation in Lemma 4.4 persists with the full sum over $D(y_1,y_2)$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.1: under $R_{\mathrm{Conj}}>\pi$ and strict positivity of $P$, the Schr\"odinger kernel satisfies $|e^{itH}(z_1,z_2)|\le C|t|^{-n/2}$ times $1$ when $r_1r_2/(2|t|)\gtrsim 1$ and times $(r_1r_2/2t)^{-(n-2)/2+\nu_0}$ when $r_1r_2/(2|t|)\lesssim 1$. The same geometric assumption yields Besov-space decay for the half-wave propagator $e^{it\sqrt H}$ at rate $|t|^{-(n-1)/2}$. The author's view is that the obstacle to such estimates is precisely the presence of conjugate points within travel time $\pi$ of the rescaled geodesic flow on the cone, so the radius-$\pi$ threshold is the natural dividing line.

Load-bearing premise

The whole argument stands on the modified Hadamard parametrix staying valid up to time $s=\pi$ when the exponential map of $Y$ is only a local covering map, not a diffeomorphism; in particular, on every geodesic sheet in the distance spectrum $D(y_1,y_2)$ the same parametrix and jet-matching must hold, while the paper writes out the details only for the sheet $d=d_h(y_1,y_2)$ and asserts the other sheets are 'the same, in fact simpler'.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any closed $Y$ with $R_{\mathrm{Conj}}>\pi$, the free Schr\"odinger decay $\|e^{itH}\|_{L^1\to L^\infty}\le C|t|^{-n/2}$ holds when the angular operator is positive.
  • If the angular ground state satisfies $\alpha\ge 0$, one gains extra radial weight decay, $\|r_1^{-\alpha}e^{itH}r_2^{-\alpha}\|_{L^1\to L^\infty}\le C|t|^{-n/2-\alpha}$.
  • For negative $\alpha$, the propagator still obeys $L^{q'}\to L^q$ decay for $q<q(\alpha)$, with the range restricted by the angular ground state.
  • The half-wave propagator satisfies $\|e^{it\sqrt H}f\|_{L^\infty}\le C|t|^{-(n-1)/2}\|f\|_{\dot B^{(n+1)/2}_{1,1}}$, the natural conical analogue of Euclidean wave decay.
  • Because the threshold is $\pi$, the same method is expected to break down exactly when $R_{\mathrm{Conj}}\le\pi$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper explicitly leaves $R_{\mathrm{Conj}}\le\pi$ to future work; the natural conjecture is failure of the global pointwise bound on cones over spheres of radius $\le 1$, consistent with the cited counterexample in the literature.
  • The matching condition (3.37) suggests that microlocalized decay may survive even at the threshold, so the sharp transition might be visible only in the global kernel, not in frequency-localized pieces.
  • The radial factor in (1.8) is determined by the smallest angular eigenvalue $\nu_0$; one could test the same identity for $Y=S^{n-1}$ with an inverse-square potential and compare with known Euclidean inverse-square results.
  • Since the proof treats the top-order singularity through the distance spectrum, a concrete computation of $I_{GD}$ on a flat torus, where $R_{\mathrm{Conj}}=\infty$ but $inj(Y)$ is finite, would isolate the role of geodesic loops versus conjugate points.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies pointwise dispersive estimates for the Schrödinger propagator e^{itH} and the half-wave propagator e^{it√H} on a product cone X=C(Y) with metric g=dr^2+r^2h, where H=Δ_g+V_0(y)r^{-2}. The main result, Theorem 1.1, asserts that if the conjugate radius of the closed manifold Y satisfies R_Conj(Y)>π and the operator P=Δ_h+V_0+(n-2)^2/4 is strictly positive, then the Schwartz kernel of e^{itH} obeys the bound (1.8), with an explicit dependence on the normalized variable r_1r_2/(2|t|). The proof combines an exact representation of the propagator kernel via Bessel functions (Proposition 2.1), a Hadamard-type parametrix for cos(s√P) and the Poisson-wave propagator on Y (Section 3), and a delicate stationary-phase analysis of the resulting oscillatory integrals (Section 4). The paper also derives weighted L^1→L^∞ estimates (Corollary 1.4), L^{q'}→L^q estimates (Theorem 1.6), and Besov-space decay estimates for the half-wave propagator (Theorem 1.11) via Littlewood-Paley theory and heat-kernel bounds. A new threshold phenomenon at R_Conj=π is claimed, separating the positive result from known counterexamples on spheres of radius less than 1.

Significance. If the proof is completed, the paper gives the first pointwise dispersive estimates for Schrödinger and wave equations on general product cones with a sharp geometric threshold (R_Conj>π), generalizing flat-cone results (Ford, Blair-Ford-Marzuola, Zhang) and matching the sphere counterexamples (Taira). The approach is largely parameter-free: the kernel representation in Proposition 2.1 is exact, and the parametrices in Section 3 involve no fitted constants. The Littlewood-Paley and heat-kernel ingredients are standard and carefully connected to the dispersive estimates. The threshold claim is falsifiable and plausible in view of the rescaled geodesic flow structure. However, the current manuscript leaves several load-bearing technical points unproved, most notably the treatment of non-distance sheets in the parametrix sum and the corresponding stationary-phase and boundary-cancellation arguments; these gaps must be fixed before the main theorem can be considered established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.2, Lemma 4.3] The proof of Lemma 4.3 is carried out only for d(y1,y2)=d_h(y1,y2). The claim that non-distance sheets d∈D(y1,y2) are 'the same, in fact simpler' because d is lower bounded by inj(Y)>0 is not substantiated. In Case 2, the argument requires d ≥ C1 z^{-1/2} to ensure that the β0-neighborhood {|s-d| ≤ (zd)^{-1}} stays away from s=0 and to justify the bounds in (4.24)-(4.26). For a non-distance sheet with d ≥ inj(Y), the inequality d ≥ C1 z^{-1/2} fails for the bounded-z window 1 ≪ z < (C1/inj(Y))^2; the paper supplies no separate estimate there. Since Lemma 4.3 is the only estimate behind Proposition 4.2 and hence Theorem 1.1, this is a load-bearing gap.
  2. [Section 3.2, Corollary 3.6] The parametrix (3.31) represents cos(s√P) as a sum over d∈D(y1,y2) and treats each d as a smooth phase function on Y×Y. Corollary 3.6 inherits this from Proposition 3.4, where each sheet of the Lagrangian L± is parametrized by φ_d = d(y1,y2)1·ξ. However, for a geodesic loop counted with multiplicity, the function d is only locally smooth and has conical singularities where different geodesics merge; e.g., on a flat 2-torus, d_{1,0}(y1,y2)=|y1-y2+(1,0)| is not differentiable on the cut locus y1-y2=(-1,0). Proposition 3.2 proves only that the fibers of exp_{y0}|_B are finite and uniformly bounded, not that the individual sheets can be chosen smooth globally or that the singularity set can be excluded from the stationary-phase and boundary-cancellation arguments. In particular, Proposition 4.6 uses the jet matching (3.37) sheet by sheet; if a sheet is only piecewise smooth, the integration-by-parts identities (4.43)-(4.44) and the cancellation in I_GD may produce boundary terms at the singularities that are not controlled uniformly in y1,y2. An explicit treatment of the non-distance sheets is therefore required.
  3. [Section 4.2, proof of Lemma 4.3] The footnote at the end of the proof of Lemma 4.3 concedes that the integration by parts in dρ near ρ=+∞ is not justified and says 'we omit the details'. This is not a cosmetic point: the estimates (4.21) and (4.28) rely on integrating by parts in ρ to gain ρ^{-N} and on dropping the boundary term at infinity, and the same device is reused in the IGD estimates (4.46)-(4.59). Without a rigorous dyadic localization near infinity (or an alternative justification to interpret these as oscillatory integrals with admissible cutoffs), the uniform bound (4.13) is not established. The gap is routine in nature but must be filled, as the argument is load-bearing for Proposition 4.2.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract / Section 1] The abstract uses 'conjugate radius ε' while the main text uses R_Conj; please unify the notation.
  2. [Section 5, proof of Proposition 5.1] In the displayed estimate after equation (5.4), the inequality d(z1,j,z0)+d(z0,z2,j) ≥ 1/2(d(z1,j,z0)+d(z0,z2,j))^2 is dimensionally inconsistent; it should be replaced by an inequality such as (d1+d2)^2 ≥ d^2(z1,j,z2,j) together with e^{-(d1^2+d2^2)/c} ≤ e^{-(d1+d2)^2/(2c)}.
  3. [Section 1, Remark 1.3] The sign convention in the operator in Remark 1.3 ('−∆ + V0(y)r^{-2}') differs from that in (1.1) where H = ∆_g + V0(y)r^{-2}; please clarify the convention.
  4. [Section 4.2, Lemma 4.4] In (4.31), after 2m integrations by parts, the denominator should contain ν^{2m} consistently in both integrals; the current display shows the same notation after the second integral, but the derivation in the proof would be clearer if the powers were tracked explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the pointwise dispersive estimate is derived from an exact kernel identity and an internally constructed Hadamard parametrix, with no fitted parameter or equivalent input.

full rationale

The central claim Theorem 1.1 is obtained from the exact Cheeger--Taylor/Bessel representation of the Schrödinger kernel (Proposition 2.1) followed by a parametrix construction for cos(s sqrt(P)) and the Poisson-wave propagator (Corollary 3.6 and Lemma 3.7). The target inequality is never assumed as an input; the kernel representation is exact and the parametrix is constructed in the paper. No parameter is fitted to the data being predicted. The dependence on nu0, the square root of the smallest eigenvalue of P, is a genuine spectral parameter of the operator, not a fitting device. The proof of the main estimate proceeds by stationary-phase and integration-by-parts arguments whose inputs are the parametrix symbols and geometric facts such as R_Conj > pi. Self-citations occur, e.g. [19] for heat-kernel bounds used in the Littlewood-Paley section, but those are auxiliary tools for corollaries and wave estimates, not equivalent restatements of the main pointwise bound, and they are independent prior theorems rather than fitted values. The skeptical concern that Lemma 4.3 is proved only for d = d_h and that non-distance sheets are dismissed as 'simpler' is a possible technical gap or correctness risk, not a circularity: the paper does not assume the estimate for those sheets, it asserts a proof is available. A missing or incomplete justification is different from a derivation that reduces to its own inputs. Therefore no circular step is exhibited, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted: nu0 is the smallest eigenvalue of the given operator P, not a fit. No new physical or geometric entities are introduced; the 'distance spectrum' D(y1,y2) is a bookkeeping device for geodesics, not an invented entity. The central claim rests on standard functional calculus, Bessel analysis, FIO parametrix theory, and prior heat kernel bounds.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Cheeger-Taylor functional calculus and separation of variables give the exact kernel representation (2.1) with Weber's Bessel integral.
    Used in Proposition 2.1 to write e^{itH} as an integral over Bessel functions and then as cosine/Poisson wave operators.
  • domain assumption The operator P = Delta_h + V0 + (n-2)^2/4 is strictly positive, so nu0 = sqrt(min spec P) is real and positive.
    Explicit hypothesis of Theorem 1.1; the exponent nu0 appears in the decay rate.
  • domain assumption The conjugate radius R_Conj(Y) is larger than pi, so the exponential map is non-degenerate on balls of radius pi+epsilon.
    Key hypothesis; enables the modified Hadamard parametrix over the distance spectrum.
  • standard math Bessel function estimates for J_nu, including the asymptotic forms (6.12)-(6.14).
    Used in Propositions 4.1 and 6.1 to control Bessel sums and radial kernels; cited from [6, Lemma 5.1] and Watson.
  • domain assumption Heat kernel Gaussian upper bound (5.1) for e^{-tH} on the cone.
    From [19, Theorem 1.1], used for Bernstein and square function inequalities in Section 5.
  • standard math Subordination formula (7.3) for the microlocalized half-wave propagator.
    Cited from [33, Proposition 4.1] and [8, Proposition 2.2], used in Proposition 7.2.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pointwise dispersive estimates for Schrodinger and wave equations in a conical singular space." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AMLQS4XR

@misc{pith2026241116029,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pointwise dispersive estimates for Schrodinger and wave equations in a conical singular space},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AMLQS4XR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16029}
}
abstract

We study the pointwise decay estimates for the Schr\"odinger and wave equations on a product cone $(X,g)$, where the metric $g=dr^2+r^2 h$ and $X=C(Y)=(0,\infty)\times Y$ is a product cone over the closed Riemannian manifold $(Y,h)$ with metric $h$. Under the assumption that the conjugate radius $\epsilon$ of $Y$ satisfies $\epsilon>\pi$, we prove the pointwise dispersive estimates for the Schr\"odinger and half-wave propagator in this setting. The key ingredient is the modified Hadamard parametrix on $Y$ in which the role of the conjugate points does not come to play if $\epsilon>\pi$. In a work in progress, we will further study the case that $\epsilon\leq\pi$ in which the role of conjugate points come. A new finding is that a threshold of the conjugate radius of $Y$ for $L^p$-estimates in this setting is the magical number $\pi$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Decay and Strichartz estimates for critical electromagnetic wave equations on conic manifolds

    math.AP 2025-06 reject novelty 7.0 of 10

    The authors establish microlocalized pointwise decay and Strichartz estimates for electromagnetic wave equations on n-dimensional product cones, with the admissible p-range restricted by the smallest eigenvalue of the...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    G. K. Alexopoulos , Spectral multipliers for Markov chains , J. Math. Soc. Japan 56 (2004), no. 3, 833-852

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    N. Burq, P. Gerard, N. Tzvetkov , Strichartz inequalities and the non-linear Schr¨ odinger equation on compact manifolds , Amer. J. Math, 126 (2004), 569-605

    work page 2004

  3. [3]

    N. Burq C. Guillarmou and A. Hassell , Strichartz estimates without loss on manifolds with hyperbolic trapped geodesics , Geom. Funct. Anal. 20(2010), 627-656

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    M. D. Blair, G. A. Ford, and J. L. Marzuola , Strichartz estimates for the wave equation on flat cones , IMRN, 2012, 30 pages, doi:10.1093/imrn/rns002

    doi:10.1093/imrn/rns002 2012

  5. [5]

    N. Burq, F. Planchon, J. Stalker, and A. S. Tahvildar-Zadeh, Strichartz estimates for the wave and Schr¨ odinger equations with the inverse-sq uare potential ,J. Funct. Anal. 203(2003), 519-549

    work page 2003

  6. [6]

    Cacciafesta, P

    F. Cacciafesta, P. D’Ancona, Z. Yin and J. Zhang ,Dispersive estimates for Dirac equa- tions in Aharonov-Bohm magnetic fields: massless case , arXiv:2407.12369

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    Chen , The semiclassical resolvent on conic manifolds and applica tion to Schr¨ odinger equations

    X. Chen , The semiclassical resolvent on conic manifolds and applica tion to Schr¨ odinger equations. Comm. Math. Phy., 2(2022),757-826

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    D’Ancona, V

    P. D’Ancona, V. Pierfelice and F. Ricci , On the wave equation associated to the Hermite and the twisted Laplacian , J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 16 (2010), no. 2, 294-310

    work page 2010

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Carron , Le saut en z´ ero de la fonction de d´ ecalage spectral, J

    G. Carron , Le saut en z´ ero de la fonction de d´ ecalage spectral, J. Funct. Anal., 212 (2004), 222-260

    2004

  2. [10]

    Cheeger, M

    J. Cheeger, M. Taylor , Diffraction of waves by Conical Singularities parts I , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 35(1982), 275-331

    1982

  3. [11]

    Cheeger, M

    J. Cheeger, M. Taylor , Diffraction of waves by Conical Singularities parts II , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 35(1982), 487-529

    1982

  4. [12]

    G. A. Ford , The fundamental solution and Strichartz estimates for the S chr¨ odinger equation on flat Euclidean cones , Comm. Math. Phys., 299(2010), 447-467

    2010

  5. [13]

    G. A. Ford, and J. Wunsch , The diffractive wave trace on manifolds with conic singulari - ties, Adv. in Math. 304 (2017), 1330-1385

    2017

  6. [14]

    F anelli, V

    L. F anelli, V. Felli, M. A. Fontelos and A. Primo , Time decay of scaling critical electromagnetic Schr¨ odinger flows, Comm. Math. Phys. 324 (2013), no. 3, 1033-1067

    2013

  7. [15]

    Hassell and P

    A. Hassell and P. Lin , The Riesz transform for homogeneous Schr¨ odinger operator s on metric cones , Rev. Mat.Iberoamericana, 30(2014),477-522

    2014

  8. [16]

    Hassell and J

    A. Hassell and J. Wunsch , The semiclassical resolvent and propagator for non-trappi ng scattering metrices, Adv. Math. 217(2008), 586-682

    2008

  9. [17]

    Hassell and J

    A. Hassell and J. Wunsch , The Schr¨ odinger propagator for scattering metrics , Ann. of Math., 162(2005), 487-523

    2005

  10. [18]

    Hassell and J

    A. Hassell and J. Zhang , Global-in-time Strichartz estimates on nontrapping asymp toti- cally conic manifolds , Analysis & PDE, 9(2016), 151-192

    2016

  11. [19]

    Huang and J

    X. Huang and J. Zhang , Heat kernel estimate in a conical singular space , The J. Geometry. Anal., 33(2023), 284

    2023

  12. [20]

    H ¨ormander, The analysis of linear partial differential operators III: pseudo-differential operators

    L. H ¨ormander, The analysis of linear partial differential operators III: pseudo-differential operators. Springer Berlin-Heidelberg 2009

    2009

  13. [21]

    H ¨ormander, The analysis of linear partial differential operators IV: F ourier integral op- erators

    L. H ¨ormander, The analysis of linear partial differential operators IV: F ourier integral op- erators. Springer Berlin-Heidelberg 1985

    1985

  14. [22]

    H ¨ormander and H

    L. H ¨ormander and H. Duistermaat , Fourier integral operators II , Acta. Math., 128(1972), 183-269

    1972

  15. [23]

    H ¨ormander, Fourier integral operators I , Acta

    L. H ¨ormander, Fourier integral operators I , Acta. Math., 127(1971), 79-183

    1971

  16. [24]

    Jia and J

    Q. Jia and J. Zhang , Strichartz estimates for Schr¨ odinger equation in high dim ensional critical electromagnetic fields , preprint, arXiv:2412.02296

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    The two-point Weyl law on manifolds without conjugate point s, PhD thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2021

    2021

  18. [26]

    Keeler and J

    B. Keeler and J. L. Marzuola , Pointwise dispersive estimates for Schr¨ odinger operator s on product cones , J. Diff. Equ., 320(2022), 419-468

    2022

  19. [27]

    Keel and T

    M. Keel and T. Tao , Endpoint Strichartz estimates , Amer. J. Math., 120(1998), 955-980

    1998

  20. [28]

    Killip, C

    R. Killip, C. Miao, M. Visan, J. Zhang, J. Zheng Sobolev spaces adapted to the Schr¨ odinger operator with inverse-square potential, Math. Z. 288(2018), 1273–1298. 48 QIUYE JIA AND JUNYONG ZHANG

    2018

  21. [29]

    C. Miao, X. Su and J. Zheng , The W s,p-boundedness of stationary wave operators for the Schr¨ odinger operator with inverse-square potential, Tran. Amer. Math. Soc., 376(2023), 1739–1797

    2023

  22. [30]

    Anders Melin and Johannes Sj ¨ostrand, Fourier integral operators with complex-valued phase functions Springer, Lecture Notes in Mathematics (volume 459), 1976

    1976

  23. [31]

    Anders Melin and Johannes Sj ¨ostrand, Fourier integral operators with complex phase functions and parametrix for an interior boundary value pro blem CPDE 1 (4) (1976), 313- 400

    1976

  24. [32]

    Melrose and Maciej Zworski , Scattering metrics and geodesic flow at infinity , Inventiones mathematicae 124(1996), 389-436

    Richard B. Melrose and Maciej Zworski , Scattering metrics and geodesic flow at infinity , Inventiones mathematicae 124(1996), 389-436

    1996

  25. [33]

    M ¨uller and A

    D. M ¨uller and A. Seeger , Sharp Lp bounds for the wave equation on groups of Heisenberg type, Anal. PDE 8 (2015), no. 5, 1051-1100

    2015

  26. [34]

    M ¨uller and A

    D. M ¨uller and A. Seeger , Regularity properties of wave propagation on conic manifol ds and applications to spectral multipliers , Adv. in Math. 161(2001), 41-130

    2001

  27. [35]

    Moriguti, K

    S. Moriguti, K. Udagaw a and S. Hitotumatu , Sugaku Koshiki I, II, III , Iwanami Shoten (in Japanese)

  28. [36]

    Reed, and B

    M. Reed, and B. Simon, , Methods of modern mathematical physics. II. Fourier analys is, self-adjointness. Academic Press, New York-London, 1975

    1975

  29. [37]

    Nagase , The fundamental solutions of the heat equations on Riemanni an spaces with cone-like singular points , Kodai Math

    M. Nagase , The fundamental solutions of the heat equations on Riemanni an spaces with cone-like singular points , Kodai Math. J., 7(1984), 382-455

    1984

  30. [38]

    Sogge and S

    C.D. Sogge and S. Huang Concerning Lp resolvent estimates for simply connected man i- folds of constant curvature , Journal of Functional Analysis, Vol.267(2014), 4635–466 6

    2014

  31. [39]

    Complex powers of an elliptic operator , Amer

    Seeley, Robert T. Complex powers of an elliptic operator , Amer. Math. Soc. Proc. Symp. Pure Math. Vol.10(1967) 288–307

    1967

  32. [40]

    , Pseudodifferential Operators and Spectral Theory

    Shubin, Mikhail A. , Pseudodifferential Operators and Spectral Theory . Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, 2001

    2001

  33. [41]

    C. D. Sogge , Fourier Integrals in Classical Analysis, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics , vol. 105, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993

    1993

  34. [42]

    C. D. Sogge , Hangzhou lectures on eigenfunctions of the Laplacian. Ann als of Mathematics Studies, 188. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2 014

  35. [43]

    Schlag, A

    W. Schlag, A. Soffer and W. Staubach , Decay for the wave and Schr¨ odinger evolutions on manifolds with conical ends, Part I , Trans. AMS 362(2010), 19-52

    2010

  36. [44]

    Schlag, A

    W. Schlag, A. Soffer and W. Staubach , Decay for the wave and Schr¨ odinger evolutions on manifolds with conical ends, Part II , Trans. AMS 362(2010), 289-318

    2010

  37. [45]

    Schlag , On pointwise decay of waves

    W. Schlag , On pointwise decay of waves . J. Math. Phys. 62(2021), 061509

    2021

  38. [46]

    E. M. Stein , Singular Integrals and Differentiability Properties of Fun ctions, Princeton Uni- versity Press, Princeton (1970)

    1970

  39. [47]

    Taylor, Partial Differential Equations, Vol II , Springer, 1996

    M. Taylor, Partial Differential Equations, Vol II , Springer, 1996

    1996

  40. [48]

    Taira, Dispersive estimates and optimality for Schr¨ odinger equa tions on product cones , arXiv:2503.21527

    K. Taira, Dispersive estimates and optimality for Schr¨ odinger equa tions on product cones , arXiv:2503.21527

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    G. N. W atson, A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions. Second Edition , Cambridge University Press, 1944

    1944

  42. [50]

    W ang, Asymptotic expansion in time of the Schr¨ odinger group on conical manifolds, Ann

    X. W ang, Asymptotic expansion in time of the Schr¨ odinger group on conical manifolds, Ann. Inst. Fourier, 56(2006), 1903-1945

    2006

  43. [51]

    W ang, F

    H. W ang, F. Zhang and J. Zhang , Decay estimates for one Aharonov-Bohm solenoid in a uniform magnetic field II: wave equation , arXiv:2309.07649

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    S. T. Yau , Nonlinear Analysis in Geometry, Monographie No. 33 de l’En seignement Math´ ematique, S´ erie des Conf´ erences de l’Union Math´ ematique Internationale, No. 8

  45. [53]

    Zelditch , Eigenfunctions of the Laplacian on a Riemannian manifold

    S. Zelditch , Eigenfunctions of the Laplacian on a Riemannian manifold. CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, 125

  46. [54]

    Zhang , Resolvent and spectral measure for Schrodinger operators o n flat Euclidean cones , J

    J. Zhang , Resolvent and spectral measure for Schrodinger operators o n flat Euclidean cones , J. Funct. Anal. 282(2022), 109311

    2022

  47. [55]

    Zhang and J

    J. Zhang and J. Zheng , Global-in-time Strichartz estimates and cubic Schr¨ odinger equation in a conical singular space , arXiv:1702.05813v3

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    Zhang and J

    J. Zhang and J. Zheng , Strichartz estimates and wave equation in a conic singular s pace, Math. Ann., 376(2020),525–581

    2020

  49. [57]

    Zhang and J

    J. Zhang and J. Zheng , Global-in-time Strichartz estimate on scattering manifol d, Commu. in PDE, 42(2017), 1962-1981. DISPERSIVE ESTIMATES FOR SCHR ¨ODINGER AND W A VE 49 Mathematical Sciences Institute, the Australian National Un iversity; Email address : Qiuye.Jia@anu.edu....

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.