The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2006.08334 · v1 · pith:ANPMRTQ3 · submitted 2020-06-06 · cs.CL · cs.SE

StackOverflow vs Kaggle: A Study of Developer Discussions About Data Science

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:ANPMRTQ3record.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL cs.SE
keywords stackoverflowdiscussionkaggletopicswhilealgorithmscommunitiesconcepts
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Software developers are increasingly required to understand fundamental Data science (DS) concepts. Recently, the presence of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) has dramatically increased in the development of user applications, whether they are leveraged through frameworks or implemented from scratch. These topics attract much discussion on online platforms. This paper conducts large-scale qualitative and quantitative experiments to study the characteristics of 197836 posts from StackOverflow and Kaggle. Latent Dirichlet Allocation topic modelling is used to extract twenty-four DS discussion topics. The main findings include that TensorFlow-related topics were most prevalent in StackOverflow, while meta discussion topics were the prevalent ones on Kaggle. StackOverflow tends to include lower-level troubleshooting, while Kaggle focuses on practicality and optimising leaderboard performance. In addition, across both communities, DS discussion is increasing at a dramatic rate. While TensorFlow discussion on StackOverflow is slowing, interest in Keras is rising. Finally, ensemble algorithms are the most mentioned ML/DL algorithms in Kaggle but are rarely discussed on StackOverflow. These findings can help educators and researchers to more effectively tailor and prioritise efforts in researching and communicating DS concepts towards different developer communities.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.