Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 76 references

Global fluctuations for standard Young tableaux

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Random standard Young tableaux height fluctuations converge to a conditioned Gaussian Free Field, in three distinct models.

desk verdict Strong new machinery and real results, but the advertised convergence to a conditioned GFF runs ahead of the proofs, which establish moment convergence of polynomial observables only. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.18601 v2 pith:AQVCHQTW submitted 2025-07-24 math.PR math-phmath.COmath.MPmath.RT

Gabriel Raposo This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRmath-phmath.COmath.MPmath.RT MSC 60F0560G1505E1020C3060C05
keywords YounggeneratingfunctionPlancherelgrowthprocessstandardtableauxGaussianFreeFieldintegerpartitionscentrallimittheoremGelfand–TsetlinalgebraextremecharactersofS∞
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces the Young generating function, a power-series object attached to any probability measure on integer partitions, and proves that simple analytic conditions on this function are necessary and sufficient for the measure to satisfy a law of large numbers and a central limit theorem. A multilevel version of the same criteria controls random increasing sequences of partitions, which are exactly random standard Young tableaux, and yields explicit covariance formulas for their height functions. Applying this machinery to three models — the Plancherel growth process, random tableaux of fixed shape, and measures induced by extreme characters of the infinite symmetric group — the paper identifies all three two-dimensional fluctuation limits as one universal object: the Gaussian Free Field conditioned to have zero mass on every horizontal slice. The conditioning is forced by the deterministic identity $\int H(x,t)\,dx = t$, and it distinguishes these partition models from the unconditioned GFF limits familiar from random matrix theory.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Young generating function $A_\rho(x_1,x_2,\ldots) := M_\rho(U_\infty)$, defined as the image under the central character $M_\rho$ of a universal element $U_\infty$ of the group ring of $S_\infty$; its logarithm is the generating function of permutation-cumulants, making it the exact partition analog of the characteristic function. The technical core is a new expansion of Biane's operator $D_k$ — realized as the trace of powers of a transposition-weighted matrix, equivalently the conditional expectation of powers of Jucys–Murphy elements — and of products of such operators inside the Gelfand–Tsetlin algebra of $S_n$. The leading coefficients of these expansions are counted by non-crossing set partitions and the Kreweras complement, via new summation identities for generalized falling factorials. These expansions convert multilevel moment computations into contour integrals whose integrands produce exactly the covariance kernel of the conditioned GFF.

What would settle it

Simulate the Plancherel growth process via RSK for $n=10^4$ and times $t=0.25, 0.5, 0.75$, compute the empirical covariance of $\sqrt{\pi}(H(\sqrt{n}x,nt)-EH(\sqrt{n}x,nt))$ integrated against $x^k$, and compare with the kernel of Section 3.4; a discrepancy beyond Monte Carlo error would refute Theorem 3.6. Equivalently, for fixed $k$, compute the fourth cumulant of the observable $M^P_{\alpha,k}$ at $n=10^6$: the paper predicts it vanishes as $n^{-2}$, and any slower decay falsifies the CLT part of the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the scaled height fluctuations of (i) the Plancherel growth process, (ii) uniformly random standard Young tableaux of a fixed deterministic shape, and (iii) distributions induced by rescaled extreme characters of $S_\infty$, all converge as $n\to\infty$ to the same Gaussian field $\mathcal{C}(x,t)$, whose covariance kernel is the ordinary Gaussian Free Field kernel minus a deterministic term $-\frac{\min(t(z),t(w))}{\pi}\Im(1/z)\Im(1/w)$. In the Plancherel case the statement takes the explicit form $\sqrt{\pi}\big(H(\sqrt{n}x,nt)-EH(\sqrt{n}x,nt)\big) \to \mathcal{C}(x,t)$, where convergence holds in the sense of moments of the integrated observables $M^P_{\alpha,k}$. Because the subtracted term is exactly what forces $\int \mathcal{C}(x,t)\,dx = 0$, the paper interprets these fluctuations as those of a GFF conditioned on a single linear constraint — a constraint already present at the level of the height function itself. The theorems thereby contradict the prior expectation, based on random-matrix analogies, that these models would exhibit unconditioned GFF fluctuations.

Load-bearing premise

The proofs establish convergence of the moments of the integrated observables to the moments of the conditioned GFF; the unstated load-bearing premise is that this moment convergence forces the rescaled height process itself to converge to that field — a tightness step that the paper does not carry out.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any probability measure on partitions whose Young generating function satisfies two analytic conditions automatically obeys an LLN and a CLT, so the criterion can be checked without constructing a coupling to particles or a determinantal process.
  • The multilevel CLT yields central limit theorems for statistics such as the content of the box containing $n$ in a random tableau, resolving a 2007 conjecture of Pittel and Romik.
  • Sending the intermediate time scale $\alpha\to 0$ recovers a semicircle law and the Vershik–Kerov–Logan–Shepp limit shape for sublinear random tableaux, unifying edge and bulk behavior in one formula.
  • The Gelfand and Schur–Weyl distributions also fall into the framework, so the conditioned GFF is not tied to the Plancherel measure but is a shared fluctuation law for a whole family of representation-theoretic distributions.
  • The explicit covariance kernels provide a blueprint for numerical simulation of the limiting fluctuations through standard RSK or hook-walk algorithms.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the mechanism behind the conditioning — a conserved integral of the height function surviving in the limit — suggests that any growth model whose height function has a deterministic linear constraint will produce a conditioned, not free, field; this could be tested on other Young-graph random walks or on Jack–Plancherel measures.
  • Editorial inference: the paper proves convergence in the sense of moments of the observables $M^P$, $M^S$, $M^{\mathrm{Fix}}$, but not tightness of the rescaled height processes; adding tightness would upgrade the theorems to full weak convergence of the random fields, and the explicit covariance formulas make that a concrete next step.
  • Editorial inference: because the covariance kernel is written in closed form, one can formally compute the distribution of the field integrated against arbitrary test functions; this yields testable predictions, e.g. the variance of the field's integral over a wedge in space-time should equal a specific number that numerical RSK simulations could check.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a 'Young generating function' for probability measures on integer partitions and uses it to give necessary and sufficient conditions for a sequence of random partitions to satisfy a law of large numbers and a central limit theorem. It then proves a multilevel CLT for random increasing sequences of partitions, which is applied to the Plancherel growth process, random standard Young tableaux of fixed shape, and measures induced by extreme characters of S_∞. In all three applications, the claimed limit of the rescaled height-function fluctuations is a conditioned Gaussian free field C on the upper half-plane. The proofs are based on explicit expansions of operators in the Gelfand–Tsetlin algebra, with detailed combinatorial arguments involving non-crossing partitions, Kreweras complements, and cumulant expansions.

Significance. If the main claims are fully established, this would be a substantial contribution: it provides a unified framework covering LLN, CLT, and multilevel fluctuations for a broad class of partition measures, and it gives explicit covariance formulas in three previously inaccessible two-dimensional fluctuation regimes. The operator expansions in the Gelfand–Tsetlin algebra and the related combinatorial identities are technically impressive and are of independent interest. The paper also resolves a Pittel–Romik conjecture and offers falsifiable, explicit covariance formulas that can be checked numerically. However, the advertised process-level convergence to a conditioned GFF is not actually proved: the text establishes moment convergence of a restricted family of polynomial observables, and the missing tightness/approximation step is load-bearing for the central claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [§7.2–7.4, Theorems 3.6, 3.9, 3.12] The theorems are stated as process-level convergence, e.g. √π(H(√n x, nt) − E H(√n x, nt)) → C(x,t), but the proofs only establish convergence in the sense of moments of the observables M^P_{α,k}, M^S_{α,k}, and M^Fix_{α,k}, which are integrals of the height fluctuation against x^k at fixed times. No tightness, no uniform estimate, and no approximation by a dense set of test functions f(x,t) is supplied. Moment convergence of these fixed-time polynomial observables is strictly weaker than convergence of the generalized random field tested against smooth compactly supported functions; the covariance kernel alone does not identify the law of the random height process without an additional argument. This gap affects all three applications and is not addressed in §7.5, which only discusses the Plancherel case.
  2. [§7.5, Proposition 3.5] The identification of the limiting object C with a conditioned Gaussian free field is verified only in the Plancherel case: the projection P[G](f) = G(f − f(0)) is checked for semicircular contours, and the other two models are dismissed as 'equivalent.' The contour systems s_F and ŝ_F in Theorems 3.9 and 3.12 are genuinely different, and the orthogonality of the projection and the covariance identity must be checked separately for those systems. Since the central claim of the paper is that the limiting fluctuations are exactly this conditioned GFF, this is a load-bearing omission rather than a cosmetic one.
  3. [§3.3 and §7.5] The conditioning 'C(1)=0' is used as the defining property of the conditioned field, but C is a generalized field and C(1) is not defined by the covariance kernel given in §3.3. A rigorous definition of the conditioning subspace K, the projection P, and the sense in which C = G − P[G] is a Gaussian process indexed by the admissible test functions is needed. As written, Proposition 3.5 equates two objects without specifying the common space on which they are defined.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.1] The text contains a duplicated phrase: 'in section in section 7.1' should read 'in section 7.1.'
  2. [§2.4, Theorem 2.19] The displayed covariance formula is difficult to parse because the large parenthesis around the logarithmic term appears unbalanced; adding an extra closing parenthesis or restructuring the display would improve readability.
  3. [§3.5, Example 3.10] The computation of A_{ρ_n} is written with an approximate equality '≈'; since CLT-appropriateness is defined through exact derivatives of ln A_{ρ_n}, it would be clearer to state the precise asymptotic expansion and explain why the derivatives of the error term are negligible.
  4. [§3.6, Remark 3.13] In the displayed formula for h(x), the condition '|t| ≤ √2' uses t rather than x; the variable of the limiting diagram should be x.
  5. [§3.3] The phrase 'C can be identified as a Gaussian free field G conditioned to be 0 when integrated over the curves C_α' is used before the rigorous definition of the conditioning; it would help to state this as a proposition rather than as an informal identification.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity; only a minor forward self-citation, with a correctness gap (moment vs. process convergence) that is not circular.

  1. other [Section 3.2, Remark 3.4]
    "We can similarly define height functions associated with the transition measure and the co-transition measure. We will study their corresponding two-dimensional fluctuations in a follow-up paper[Ra25+]."

    This is a forward self-reference to the author's own follow-up paper. It is not used in any proof, definition, or theorem statement: the covariance computations in Section 7 use Theorems 2.15, 2.19, and 2.22 and Lemma 7.3, and the remark only promises future work on different height functions. It is therefore a minor non-load-bearing self-citation rather than a circular step; it is flagged because the scoring scale penalizes such self-citations even when they do not carry logical weight.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The Young generating function characterizations (Theorems 2.15 and 2.19) are genuine equivalences: LLN-appropriateness is defined through derivatives of log A_rho, while the LLN/CLT are defined through moments and cumulants of the transition measure, and both directions are proved in Sections 5 and 6 using operator expansions in the Gelfand-Tsetlin algebra. The applications do not fit any parameter; they compute A_rho or log A_rho directly from the Plancherel, extreme-character, and fixed-shape models and then read off the limiting covariance. The conditioned GFF is defined independently as a generalized Gaussian field with an explicit covariance kernel, and Section 7.5 verifies that the computed covariance kernel of the height fluctuations coincides with it; no equation reduces to its own input. The proof in Sections 7.2-7.4 establishes convergence of the specified polynomial observables in the sense of moments, and the theorems are phrased as that convergence plus an identification of the limit; the absence of a tightness/approximation argument for full process convergence is a correctness risk, not a circularity. The only self-citation is the forward reference in Remark 3.4, which is not load-bearing.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard representation theory (branching rule, characters), the Markov-Krein correspondence, Thoma's classification of extreme characters, and combinatorial identities for non-crossing partitions and Möbius inversion. No free parameters are fitted to data. The main invented objects are mathematical definitions, the Young generating function and the conditioned GFF limit, rather than empirical entities with independent evidence.

assumptions (8)
  • standard math Branching rule for restrictions of irreducible symmetric group representations to S_{n'}.
    Used in Corollary 4.6 to express multilevel probabilities in equation (2.1) as normalized traces; foundational for the multilevel CLT.
  • standard math Markov-Krein correspondence gives a homeomorphism between continuous diagrams and probability measures (Theorem 2.9).
    Defines the transition measure and underlies all translations between diagram coordinates and measure moments in Sections 3 and 7.
  • domain assumption Thoma's classification of extreme characters of S∞ by parameters (α, β).
    Section 3.5 builds the extreme-character model and condition (3.2) on this classification; if the classification were incomplete the model would not cover all characters.
  • standard math Kreweras complement bijection and the formula for |NC(µ)| in Lemma 4.15.
    Used to compute leading coefficients in the operator expansion Theorem 4.17, which feeds into the moment and covariance formulas.
  • standard math Möbius inversion on the partition lattice for cumulants and moments.
    Used repeatedly, e.g., in Lemmas 5.4 and 6.4, to relate products of moments to permutation-cumulants and falling cumulants.
  • standard math Gaussian processes are characterized by vanishing higher cumulants (Lemma 2.12).
    This is the basis for converting covariance computations into a Gaussian limit statement.
  • standard math Lagrange-Bürmann inversion formula for power series.
    Used in Lemma 7.3 and Section 7 to derive explicit formulas for moments and covariances of diagram coordinates from Stieltjes transforms.
  • domain assumption Deformation of Bufetov-Gorin [BG18, Proposition 3.13] on unicity of roots in the upper half-plane (Lemma 7.5).
    Load-bearing for Propositions 3.8 and 3.11, which identify the fluctuation domains with the upper half-plane.
invented entities (2)
  • Young generating function A_ρ(x1, x2, ...)
    purpose: Unified characteristic-function-like object for probability measures on integer partitions; its logarithmic derivatives encode LLN and CLT behavior.
    A definition introduced in Section 2.1; its value lies in the theorems proved with it, not in a separately falsifiable prediction.
  • Conditioned Gaussian Free Field C on the upper half-plane
    purpose: Universal limit object for height-function fluctuations in the three applications; the GFF conditioned to vanish when integrated over curves C_α.
    Defined by its covariance kernel in Section 3.3; the paper then proves the model covariances match it. The identification is a theorem, not independent evidence.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Global fluctuations for standard Young tableaux." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AQVCHQTW

@misc{pith2026250718601,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Global fluctuations for standard Young tableaux},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AQVCHQTW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.18601}
}
abstract

We introduce the notion of a Young generating function for a probability measure on integer partitions. We use this object to characterize probability distributions over integer partitions satisfying a law of large numbers and those that satisfy a central limit theorem. We further establish a multilevel central limit theorem, which enables the study of random standard Young tableaux. As applications of these results, we describe the fluctuations of height functions associated with (i) the Plancherel growth process, (ii) random standard Young tableaux of fixed shape, and (iii) probability distributions induced by extreme characters of the infinite symmetric group $S_\infty$. In all cases, we identify the limiting fluctuations as a conditioned Gaussian Free Field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.18601 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Young Diagram of shape λ = (5, 3, 2, 2, 1) in Russian notation with its minima (-5,-3,0,2,5). converges to a deterministic surface, a Multilevel Law of Large Numbers, while its two-dimensional fluctuations correspond to a Multilevel Central Limit Theorem. In this article, we introduce the Young generating function, an object which plays the role that the characteristic function has in classical probability. While it… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Markov–Krein transform of λ = (5, 3, 2, 2, 1). If ω is the Vershik–Kerov–Logan–Shepp curve, that is ω(t) = ( (2/π)(t arcsin(t/2) + √ 4 − t 2) if |t| ≤ 2, |t| if |t| ≥ 2, then dmK[ω](t) = (2π) −1 √ 4 − t 2 dt is the semicircle distribution. While the Markov–Krein transform may seem complicated to grasp due to it’s non-linearity, we will show how to overcome this difficulty in section 3.1 and section 7.1. In fact, thi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Graph of x → H(x, 13) when λ 13 = (5, 3, 2, 2, 1). Notice that at the level of partitions the choice of coordinate system is inconsequential, that is, moving from one coordinate system to the other can be made without major difficulties, we have that T(x, y) < t if and only if H(x, t) > 1 2 (y − |x|). A consequence of Theorem 2.21 is that a limiting surface H∞(x, t) = limn→∞ √ 1 n H( √ nx, tn) exists for any LLN-app… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Random height function H and expected height function EH for t ≤ 1000. 3.4. Plancherel growth process. We follow the discussion from the introduction with greater detail. Define the Young graph (Also called Young lattice, see [BO16, Chapter 3]) to be the graph with ver…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Sample of √ π [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Illustration of stochastic process induced from (α, β, γ). Proposition 3.8. Let ρ = (ρn)n∈N as in equation (3.2) and let F(z) = Fρ(z) be as in Definition 2.13, then for any y ∈ R and α ∈ [0, 1] the equation α z + zF(z) = y has at most one root z ∈ H. Let DF ⊆ R×[0, 1] …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Sample of √ π [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Contour lines of height function fluctuations for random SYT of size 1200. Denote z → (yF , sˆF ) an inverse of the map produced in Proposition 3.11. Define the moments of the random height function as MFix α,k = √ π Z +∞ −∞ x k [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Sample of √ π [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Random height function H and expected height function EH for square of size 32 × 32. More generally, the following computation can be carried out to describe the limiting surfaces in the general setting. By inverting the Stieltjes transform of the transition measure w…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Computation of Rem16(5, 4, 3, 2, 2). Example 4.12. The image of λ = (5, 4, 3, 2, 2) ∈ Y¯ 16 under Rem16 is (4, 3, 2) ∈ Y¯. In figure 11 we illustrate this evaluation by marking with × the deleted boxes. It is immediate from the definition of Remk that Proposition 4.13…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Computation of K  {1, 3, 5}, {2}, {4}, {6, 8}, {7} [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Illustration of computation of Kreweras complement [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_13.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    XX XX., XXXX , XXXX XX (XX) X--X

    work page

  2. [2]

    Algebra 320 , (2008), 1311--1325

    Adin R., Postnikov A., Roichman Y., Combinatorial Gelfand models , J. Algebra 320 , (2008), 1311--1325

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Aigner M., Combinatorial theory , Classics in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (1997), Reprint of the 1979 original

    work page 1997

  4. [4]

    Anderson G., Guionnet A., Zeitouni O., An Introduction to Random Matrices , Cambridge University Press (2009)

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    175 , (1997), 41--53

    Biane P., Some properties of crossings and partitions , Discrete Math. 175 , (1997), 41--53

    work page 1997

  6. [6]

    Biane P., Representations of Symmetric Groups and Free Probability , Adv. in Math. 138 (1998) 126--181

    work page 1998

  7. [7]

    Biane P., Approximate factorization and concentration for characters of symmetric groups , Int. Math. Res. Not. 4 , (2001), 179--192

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    Baik J., Deift P., Johansson K., On the distribution of the length of the longest increasing subsequence of random permutations , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 12 (1999) 1119--1178

    work page 1999

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    Borga J., Boutillier C, Féray V., Méliot P.-L., A determinantal point process approach to scaling and local limits of random Young tableaux , Ann. Probab. 53 (2025) 299--354

    2025

  2. [10]

    Borodin A., CLT for spectra of submatrices of Wigner Random Matrices , Mosc. Math. J. 14 (2014) 29--38

    2014

  3. [11]

    Theory Related Fields, 158 (2014) 225--400

    Borodin A., Corwin I., Macdonald processes , Probab. Theory Related Fields, 158 (2014) 225--400

    2014

  4. [12]

    Borodin A., Ferrari P., Anisotropic growth of random surfaces in 2+1 dimensions , Communications in Mathematical Physics, 325 (2014) 603--684

    2014

  5. [13]

    Pure Appl

    Borodin A., Gorin V., General -Jacobi Corners Process and the Gaussian Free Field , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 68 (2014) 1774--1844

    2014

  6. [14]

    Borodin A., Gorin V., Guionnet A., Gaussian asymptotics of discrete -ensembles , Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 125 (2016) 1--78

    2016

  7. [15]

    Borodin A., Okounkov A., Olshanski G., Asymptotics of Plancherel measures for symmetric groups , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 13 (2000) 481-- 515

    2000

  8. [16]

    Algebra 313 (2007) 40--60

    Borodin A., Olshanski G., Asymptotics of Plancherel-type random partitions , J. Algebra 313 (2007) 40--60

    2007

  9. [17]

    Borodin A., Olshanski G., Representations of the Infinite Symmetric Group , Cambridge University Press (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    Bufetov A., Gorin V., Representations of classical Lie groups and quantized free convolution , Geom. Funct. Anal. 25 (2015) 763--814

    2015

  11. [19]

    Bufetov A., Gorin V., Fluctuations of particle systems determined by Schur generating functions , Adv. Math. 338 (2018) 702--781

    2018

  12. [20]

    Bufetov A., Gorin V., Fourier transform on high–dimensional unitary groups with applications to random tilings , Duke Math. J. 168 (2019) 2559--2649

    2019

  13. [21]

    Ceccherini-Silberstein T., Scarabotti F., and Tolli F., Representation Theory of the Symmetric Groups: The Okounkov-Vershik Approach, Character Formulas, and Partition Algebras , Cambridge University Press (2010)

    2010

  14. [22]

    Chapuy G., Louf B., Walsh H., Random partitions under the Plancherel-Hurwitz measure, high genus Hurwitz numbers and maps , Ann. Probab. 52 (2024) 1225--1252

    2024

  15. [23]

    Cuenca C., Dołęga M., Moll A., Universality of global asymptotics of Jack-deformed random Young diagrams at varying temperatures , Ann. Probab. (2025) Available at arXiv:2304.04089

    2025

  16. [24]

    Dołęga M., Féray V., Gaussian fluctuations of Young diagrams and structure constants of Jack characters , Duke Math. J. 165 (2016), 1193--1282

    2016

  17. [25]

    Theory Related Fields 174 (2019), 133--176

    Dołęga M., Śniadi P., Gaussian fluctuations of Jack--deformed random Young diagrams , Probab. Theory Related Fields 174 (2019), 133--176

    2019

  18. [26]

    Féray V., Méliot P.-L., Asymptotics of q-Plancherel measures , Probab. Th. Rel. Fields, 152 (2012) 589--624

    2012

  19. [27]

    M., Lagrange inversion , J

    Gessel I. M., Lagrange inversion , J. Combin. Theory A 144 (2016) 212--249

    2016

  20. [28]

    Gordenko A., Limit shapes of large skew young tableaux and a modification of the tasep process , Preprint (2020) Available at arxiv.org/pdf/2009.10480

    2020 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Press (2021)

    Gorin V., Lectures on random lozenge tiling , Cambridge Univ. Press (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    Gorin V., Huang J., Dynamical loop equation , Ann. Probab. 52 (2024) 1758--1863

    2024

  23. [31]

    Theory Related Fields 175 (2019) 45--96

    Gorin V., Rahman M., Random sorting networks: local statistics via random matrix laws , Probab. Theory Related Fields 175 (2019) 45--96

    2019

  24. [32]

    S., A probabilistic proof of a formula for the number of Young tableaux of a given shape , Adv

    Greene C., Nijenhuis A., Wilf H. S., A probabilistic proof of a formula for the number of Young tableaux of a given shape , Adv. Math. 31 (1979) 104--109

    1979

  25. [33]

    Pure Appl

    Guionnet A., Huang J., Rigidity and edge universality of discrete -ensembles , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 72 (2019) 1875--1982

    2019

  26. [34]

    Hora A., Jucys--Murphy element and walks on modified Young graph , Quantum Probability Banach Center Publications 73 (2006), 223--235

    2006

  27. [35]

    Hora A., The limit shape problem for ensembles of Young diagrams , Springerbriefs in mathematical physics, Tokyo: Springer (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    Hora A., Obata N., Quantum Probability and Spectral Analysis of Graphs , Springer (2007)

    2007

  29. [37]

    Huang J., Law of large numbers and central limit theorems through Jack generating functions , Adv. Math. 380 (2021) Paper Nº107545

    2021

  30. [38]

    Ivanov, V., Olshanski G., Kerov’s central limit theorem for the Plancherel measure on Young diagrams , Symmetric functions 2001: surveys of developments and perspectives, Springer 74 (2002) 93--151

    2002

  31. [39]

    Johansson K., Discrete orthogonal polynomial ensembles and the Plancherel measure , Ann. of Math. 153 (2001) 259--296

    2001

  32. [40]

    Kenyon R., Prause I., Gradient variational problems in ^2 , Duke Math. J. 171 (2022) 3003--3022

    2022

  33. [41]

    Kerov S., Transition Probabilities of Continual Young Diagrams and Markov Moment Problem , Funktsion. Anal. i Prilozhen. 27 (1993), no. 2, 32--49; English translation: Funct. Anal. Appl, 27 (1993), 104--117

    1993

  34. [42]

    Algebraic Discrete Methods, 7 (1986) 116-124

    Kerov V., Vershik A., The Characters of the Infinite Symmetric Group and Probability Properties of the Robinson--Schensted--Knuth Algorithm SIAM J. Algebraic Discrete Methods, 7 (1986) 116-124

    1986

  35. [43]

    Kreweras G., Sur les partitions non croisees d’un cycle , Discr. Math. 1 (1972), 333--350

    1972

  36. [44]

    Le Gall J-F., Brownian Motion, Martingales, and Stochastic Calculus , Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer International Publishing, 274 (2016)

    2016

  37. [45]

    Noncommutative exchangeability systems , Math

    Lehner F., Cumulants in noncommutative probability theory I. Noncommutative exchangeability systems , Math. Zeitschriftnts 248 (2004) 67--100

    2004

  38. [46]

    P., Sirjaev A

    Leonov V. P., Sirjaev A. N. On a method of semi-invariants , Theory Probab. Appl. 4 (1959) 319--329

    1959

  39. [47]

    F., Shepp L

    Logan B. F., Shepp L. A. A variational problem for random Young tableaux , Advances in Math. 26 (1977) 206--222

    1977

  40. [48]

    Matsumoto S., Jack Deformations of Plancherel Measures and Traceless Gaussian Random Matrices , Electron. J. Combin. 15 (2008)

    2008

  41. [49]

    Méliot P.-L., Asymptotics of the Gelfand models of the symmetric groups , Preprint (2010) Available at arxiv.org/abs/1009.4047

    2010 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Méliot P.-L., Kerov’s central limit theorem for Schur--Weyl measures of parameter = 1/2 , Preprint (2010) Available at arxiv.org/abs/1009.4034

    2010 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Méliot P.-L., Kerov’s central limit theorem for Schur--Weyl and Gelfand measures (extended abstract) , Discrete Math. Theor. Comput. Sci. (2011) 669--680

    2011

  44. [52]

    Méliot P.-L., Representation Theory of Symmetric Groups , CRC Press (2017)

    2017

  45. [53]

    Moll A., Gaussian Asymptotics of Jack Measures on Partitions from Weighted Enumeration of Ribbon Paths , Int. Math. Res. Not. 3 (2023) 1801--1881

    2023

  46. [54]

    Speicher R., Lectures on the Combinatorics of Free Probability , Cambridge University Press (2006)

    Nica A., R. Speicher R., Lectures on the Combinatorics of Free Probability , Cambridge University Press (2006)

    2006

  47. [55]

    Okounkov A., Random matrices and random permutations Int. Math. Res. Notices 2000 (2000) 1043--1095

    2000

  48. [56]

    2 (1996) 581--605

    Okounkov A.,Vershik A., A new approach to representation theory of symmetric groups , Selecta Math. 2 (1996) 581--605

    1996

  49. [57]

    S., Wiener Chaos: Moments, Cumulants and Diagrams: A Survey with Computer Implementation , Bocconi & Springer Series

    Peccati G., Taqqu M. S., Wiener Chaos: Moments, Cumulants and Diagrams: A Survey with Computer Implementation , Bocconi & Springer Series. Springer-Verlag Italia Srl, 1st edition (2001)

    2001

  50. [58]

    Petrov L., Asymptotics of uniformly random lozenge tilings of polygons , Ann. Probab. 43 (2015) 1--43

    2015

  51. [59]

    D., Limit shapes for random square Young tableaux , Adv

    Pittel B., Romik. D., Limit shapes for random square Young tableaux , Adv. Appl. Math. 38 (2007) 164--209

    2007

  52. [60]

    W., Lecture notes on the Gaussian free field , Cours spécialisés, Société Mathématique de France 28 (2021)

    Powell E., Werner. W., Lecture notes on the Gaussian free field , Cours spécialisés, Société Mathématique de France 28 (2021)

    2021

  53. [61]

    Prause I., Random Young tableaux and the tangent plane method , Unpublished manuscript (2024)

    2024

  54. [62]

    Raposo G., Random matrix models for two-dimensional Gaussian fields , in preparation (2025+)

    2025

  55. [63]

    Romik D., Explicit formulas for hook walks on continual Young diagrams , Adv. Appl. Math. 32 (2004) 625--654

    2004

  56. [64]

    Romik D., The Surprising Mathematics of Longest Increasing Subsequences , Cambridge University Press, (2015)

    2015

  57. [65]

    H., Specializations of MacMahon symmetric functions and the polynomial algebra , Discrete Mathematics 246 (2002) 285--293

    Rosas M. H., Specializations of MacMahon symmetric functions and the polynomial algebra , Discrete Mathematics 246 (2002) 285--293

    2002

  58. [66]

    306 (2006), 624--665

    Śniady P., Asymptotics of characters of symmetric groups, genus expansion and free probability , Discrete Math. 306 (2006), 624--665

    2006

  59. [67]

    Theory Related Fields 136 (2006) 263--297

    Śniady P., Gaussian fluctuations of characters of symmetric groups and of Young diagrams , Probab. Theory Related Fields 136 (2006) 263--297

    2006

  60. [68]

    Discrete Math

    Śniady P., Robinson--Schensted--Knuth algorithm, jeu de taquin, and Kerov-Vershik measures on infinite tableaux , SIAM J. Discrete Math. 28 (2014), 598--630

    2014

  61. [69]

    Śniady P., Modulus of continuity of Kerov transition measure for continual Young diagrams , Electron. J. Probab. 30 (2025) 1--26

    2025

  62. [70]

    P., Cumulants and Partition lattices , Australian Journal of Statistics 25 (1983) 378--388

    Speed T. P., Cumulants and Partition lattices , Australian Journal of Statistics 25 (1983) 378--388

    1983

  63. [71]

    Speicher R., Multiplicative functions on the lattice of non-crossing partitions and free convolution , Math. Ann. 289 (1994) 611--628

    1994

  64. [72]

    Stanley R., Enumerative Combinatorics: Volume 2 , Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 2 nd Edition (2012)

    2012

  65. [73]

    Math 217 (2008) 2625--2663

    Strahov E., A differential model for the deformation of the Plancherel growth process , Adv. Math 217 (2008) 2625--2663

    2008

  66. [74]

    Sun W., Dimer model, bead model and standard Young tableaux: finite cases and limit shapes , Preprint (2018) Available at arxiv.org/pdf/1804.03414

    2018 arXiv

  67. [75]

    M., Asymptotic combinatorics and algebraic analysis , Proc

    Vershik A. M., Asymptotic combinatorics and algebraic analysis , Proc. Internat. Congress of Mathematicians, Zurich (1994) 1384--1394

    1994

  68. [76]

    M., Kerov S

    Vershik A. M., Kerov S. V., Asymptotic behavior of the Plancherel measure of the symmetric group and the limit form of Young tableaux , Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 233 (1977) 1024--1027

    1977

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.