Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Conversational Medical AI: Ready for Practice

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.12808 v2 pith:AWOYHNFF submitted 2024-11-19 cs.AI cs.CYcs.HC

classification cs.AIcs.CYcs.HC
keywords medicalconversationalhealthcarepatientsafetywhileadviceagent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The shortage of doctors is creating a critical squeeze in access to medical expertise. While conversational Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds promise in addressing this problem, its safe deployment in patient-facing roles remains largely unexplored in real-world medical settings. We present the first large-scale evaluation of a physician-supervised LLM-based conversational agent in a real-world medical setting. Our agent, Mo, was integrated into an existing medical advice chat service. Over a three-week period, we conducted a randomized controlled experiment with 926 cases to evaluate patient experience and satisfaction. Among these, Mo handled 298 complete patient interactions, for which we report physician-assessed measures of safety and medical accuracy. Patients reported higher clarity of information (3.73 vs 3.62 out of 4, p < 0.05) and overall satisfaction (4.58 vs 4.42 out of 5, p < 0.05) with AI-assisted conversations compared to standard care, while showing equivalent levels of trust and perceived empathy. The high opt-in rate (81% among respondents) exceeded previous benchmarks for AI acceptance in healthcare. Physician oversight ensured safety, with 95% of conversations rated as "good" or "excellent" by general practitioners experienced in operating a medical advice chat service. Our findings demonstrate that carefully implemented AI medical assistants can enhance patient experience while maintaining safety standards through physician supervision. This work provides empirical evidence for the feasibility of AI deployment in healthcare communication and insights into the requirements for successful integration into existing healthcare services.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AI Agents for Conversational Patient Triage: Preliminary Simulation-Based Evaluation with Real-World EHR Data

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A patient simulator built from EHR vignettes was rated consistent with those vignettes in 97.7% of 519 conversations by two clinicians, while the AI triage system's top three diagnoses contained the most likely diagno...

Pith tools