Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Cross-Modal Adapter for Vision-Language Retrieval

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.09623 v2 pith:AXZMJVUL submitted 2022-11-17 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CL
keywords retrievalpre-traineddatasetscross-modalmodeladapteradapter-basedallows
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Vision-language retrieval is an important multi-modal learning topic, where the goal is to retrieve the most relevant visual candidate for a given text query. Recently, pre-trained models, e.g., CLIP, show great potential on retrieval tasks. However, as pre-trained models are scaling up, fully fine-tuning them on donwstream retrieval datasets has a high risk of overfitting. Moreover, in practice, it would be costly to train and store a large model for each task. To overcome the above issues, we present a novel Cross-Modal Adapter for parameter-efficient transfer learning. Inspired by adapter-based methods, we adjust the pre-trained model with a few parameterization layers. However, there are two notable differences. First, our method is designed for the multi-modal domain. Secondly, it allows encoder-level implicit cross-modal interactions between vision and language encoders. Although surprisingly simple, our approach has three notable benefits: (1) reduces the vast majority of fine-tuned parameters, (2) saves training time, and (3) allows all the pre-trained parameters to be fixed, enabling the pre-trained model to be shared across datasets. Extensive experiments demonstrate that, without bells and whistles, our approach outperforms adapter-based methods on image-text retrieval datasets (MSCOCO, Flickr30K) and video-text retrieval datasets (MSR-VTT, DiDeMo, and ActivityNet).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Representation Discrepancy Bridging Method for Remote Sensing Image-Text Retrieval

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    RDB improves remote sensing image-text retrieval mean recall by 1.15 to 2 percent over fully fine-tuned GeoRSCLIP using an asymmetric adapter and a dual-task consistency loss.

Pith tools