REVIEW 2 cited by
A Survey of Multilingual Models for Automatic Speech Recognition
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Although Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems have achieved human-like performance for a few languages, the majority of the world's languages do not have usable systems due to the lack of large speech datasets to train these models. Cross-lingual transfer is an attractive solution to this problem, because low-resource languages can potentially benefit from higher-resource languages either through transfer learning, or being jointly trained in the same multilingual model. The problem of cross-lingual transfer has been well studied in ASR, however, recent advances in Self Supervised Learning are opening up avenues for unlabeled speech data to be used in multilingual ASR models, which can pave the way for improved performance on low-resource languages. In this paper, we survey the state of the art in multilingual ASR models that are built with cross-lingual transfer in mind. We present best practices for building multilingual models from research across diverse languages and techniques, discuss open questions and provide recommendations for future work.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The State of Multilingual LLM Safety Research: From Measuring the Language Gap to Mitigating It
LLM safety research at ACL venues from 2020 to 2024 is predominantly English-only, and the language gap is growing over time.
-
Evaluating Standard and Dialectal Frisian ASR: Multilingual Fine-tuning and Language Identification for Improved Low-resource Performance
Multilingual fine-tuning with Dutch and German data plus a language-identification token yields small word error rate gains for Frisian, while dialectal speech errors remain about twice as high as standard speech.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.