The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2412.20510 · v1 · pith:BDAKIGWS · submitted 2024-12-29 · cs.LG · cs.AI· stat.ML

Stratify: Unifying Multi-Step Forecasting Strategies

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:BDAKIGWSrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML
keywords strategiesforecastingstratifyexistingmulti-stepnovelstrategyimproved
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

A key aspect of temporal domains is the ability to make predictions multiple time steps into the future, a process known as multi-step forecasting (MSF). At the core of this process is selecting a forecasting strategy, however, with no existing frameworks to map out the space of strategies, practitioners are left with ad-hoc methods for strategy selection. In this work, we propose Stratify, a parameterised framework that addresses multi-step forecasting, unifying existing strategies and introducing novel, improved strategies. We evaluate Stratify on 18 benchmark datasets, five function classes, and short to long forecast horizons (10, 20, 40, 80). In over 84% of 1080 experiments, novel strategies in Stratify improved performance compared to all existing ones. Importantly, we find that no single strategy consistently outperforms others in all task settings, highlighting the need for practitioners explore the Stratify space to carefully search and select forecasting strategies based on task-specific requirements. Our results are the most comprehensive benchmarking of known and novel forecasting strategies. We make code available to reproduce our results.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.