The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2301.04027 · v2 · pith:BDVA2R65 · submitted 2023-01-10 · cs.LG · cs.CE· physics.ao-ph· physics.geo-ph

Differentiable modeling to unify machine learning and physical models and advance Geosciences

Reviewed by Pithpith:BDVA2R65open to challenge →

classification cs.LG cs.CEphysics.ao-phphysics.geo-ph
keywords differentiablemodelinglearningmachinemethodswhileamountsbetter
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Process-Based Modeling (PBM) and Machine Learning (ML) are often perceived as distinct paradigms in the geosciences. Here we present differentiable geoscientific modeling as a powerful pathway toward dissolving the perceived barrier between them and ushering in a paradigm shift. For decades, PBM offered benefits in interpretability and physical consistency but struggled to efficiently leverage large datasets. ML methods, especially deep networks, presented strong predictive skills yet lacked the ability to answer specific scientific questions. While various methods have been proposed for ML-physics integration, an important underlying theme -- differentiable modeling -- is not sufficiently recognized. Here we outline the concepts, applicability, and significance of differentiable geoscientific modeling (DG). "Differentiable" refers to accurately and efficiently calculating gradients with respect to model variables, critically enabling the learning of high-dimensional unknown relationships. DG refers to a range of methods connecting varying amounts of prior knowledge to neural networks and training them together, capturing a different scope than physics-guided machine learning and emphasizing first principles. Preliminary evidence suggests DG offers better interpretability and causality than ML, improved generalizability and extrapolation capability, and strong potential for knowledge discovery, while approaching the performance of purely data-driven ML. DG models require less training data while scaling favorably in performance and efficiency with increasing amounts of data. With DG, geoscientists may be better able to frame and investigate questions, test hypotheses, and discover unrecognized linkages.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Hybrid Modeling Framework for Crop Prediction Tasks via Dynamic Parameter Calibration and Multi-Task Learning

    cs.AI 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Hybrid neural parameterization of biophysical models plus multi-task learning improves phenology prediction accuracy by 60% and cold hardiness by 40% over deployed biophysical models.

  2. Accurate, Efficient, and Explainable Deep Learning Approaches for Environmental Science Problems

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The work introduces WaLeF/FIDLAr for flood forecasting, CoDiCast for probabilistic weather, and Hypercube-RAG for explainable environmental QA, claiming superior accuracy, efficiency, and interpretability over baselines.