Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Interactive Debugging and Steering of Multi-Agent AI Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.02068 v1 pith:BKNNWEYP submitted 2025-03-03 cs.MA cs.AIcs.HC

classification cs.MAcs.AIcs.HC
keywords agentdebugginginteractiveagentschallengescomplexdevelopersidentify
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Fully autonomous teams of LLM-powered AI agents are emerging that collaborate to perform complex tasks for users. What challenges do developers face when trying to build and debug these AI agent teams? In formative interviews with five AI agent developers, we identify core challenges: difficulty reviewing long agent conversations to localize errors, lack of support in current tools for interactive debugging, and the need for tool support to iterate on agent configuration. Based on these needs, we developed an interactive multi-agent debugging tool, AGDebugger, with a UI for browsing and sending messages, the ability to edit and reset prior agent messages, and an overview visualization for navigating complex message histories. In a two-part user study with 14 participants, we identify common user strategies for steering agents and highlight the importance of interactive message resets for debugging. Our studies deepen understanding of interfaces for debugging increasingly important agentic workflows.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TRAIL: Trace Reasoning and Agentic Issue Localization

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    TRAIL provides a public benchmark of agent execution traces annotated with errors and shows that even the best LLM judges achieve only 11% joint accuracy at localizing them.

  2. RAG Without the Lag: Interactive Debugging for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Pipelines

    cs.HC 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new interactive debugging tool for RAG pipelines lets developers tune retrieval and generation parameters in real time, and a 12-engineer study shows developers troubleshoot retrieval before generation.

Pith tools