REVIEW 4 cited by
GM-PRM: A Generative Multimodal Process Reward Model for Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
GM-PRM: A Generative Multimodal Process Reward Model for Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning
read the original abstract
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities but often struggle with complex, multi-step mathematical reasoning, where minor errors in visual perception or logical deduction can lead to complete failure. While Process Reward Models (PRMs) offer step-by-step supervision, existing multimodal PRMs are limited to being binary verifiers that can identify but not correct errors, offering little explanatory power. To address these deficiencies, we introduce the Generative Multimodal Process Reward Model (GM-PRM), a novel paradigm that transforms the PRM from a passive judge into an active reasoning collaborator. Instead of a simple scalar score, GM-PRM provides a fine-grained, interpretable analysis of each reasoning step, evaluating its step intent, visual alignment, and logical soundness. More critically, GM-PRM is trained to generate a corrected version of the first erroneous step it identifies. This unique corrective capability enables our new test-time inference strategy, Refined Best-of-N (Refined-BoN). This framework actively enhances solution quality by using the PRM's generated correction to guide the policy model toward a more promising reasoning trajectory, thereby improving the diversity and correctness of the solution pool. We demonstrate that GM-PRM achieves state-of-the-art results on multiple multimodal math benchmarks, significantly boosting policy model performance with remarkable data efficiency, requiring only a 20K-sample training dataset. Our code will be released upon acceptance.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Test-Time Scaling for Small VLMs on Multilingual Visual MCQ
On EXAMS-V, token budget and parseability dominate chain count, PRM-guided search, and selectors for small VLMs; the policy model itself yields the largest gain.
-
CogniRoute: Learning to Route Social Evidence in Omni-Modal Models
CogniRoute adds a cognitive schema and route-aware RL to an omni-modal MoE, reaching 59.38% accuracy on a new 118K-example social video QA benchmark and beating prior baselines by 15-27 points.
-
PaLMR: Towards Faithful Visual Reasoning via Multimodal Process Alignment
By gating the reinforcement-learning reward on a binary visual-fidelity score, PaLMR lifts Qwen2.5-VL-7B to 70.9 on HallusionBench and 59.3 on MMMU, surpassing its GRPO baseline.
-
Toward Native Multimodal Modeling: A Roadmap
A roadmap that defines architectural nativity for multimodal models and categorizes them into Multi-to-Text, Multi-to-Target, and Multi-to-Multi types while outlining an industrial pipeline toward unified transformer-...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.