Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Cancellation for $(G,n)$-complexes and the Swan finiteness obstruction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.01664 v2 pith:C452C7VS submitted 2020-05-04 math.AT math.GRmath.KTmath.NT

classification math.ATmath.GRmath.KTmath.NT
keywords complexesmoduleswhenfinitefinitenessmathbbobstructionprojective
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

In previous work, we related homotopy types of finite $(G,n)$-complexes when $G$ has periodic cohomology to projective $\mathbb{Z} G$-modules representing the Swan finiteness obstruction. We use this to determine when $X \vee S^n \simeq Y \vee S^n$ implies $X \simeq Y$ for finite $(G,n)$-complexes $X$ and $Y$, and give lower bounds on the number of homotopically distinct pairs when this fails. The proof involves constructing projective $\mathbb{Z} G$-modules as lifts of locally free modules over orders in products of quaternion algebras, whose existence follows from the Eichler mass formula. In the case $n=2$, difficulties arise which lead to a new approach to finding a counterexample to Wall's D2 problem.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Connected sum decompositions of high-dimensional manifolds

    math.GT 2019-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In dimensions n at least 4, S^2 x S^(n-2) is not cancellable, so connected sum decomposition is not unique; for simply connected manifolds the same failure is claimed for n at least 17.

Pith tools