Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

SLM: Bridge the thin gap between speech and text foundation models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.00230 v1 pith:CE3LAB7U submitted 2023-09-30 cs.CL cs.SDeess.AS

classification cs.CLcs.SDeess.AS
keywords speechmodelsfoundationlanguageonlypretrainedtasksadaptation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a joint Speech and Language Model (SLM), a multitask, multilingual, and dual-modal model that takes advantage of pretrained foundational speech and language models. SLM freezes the pretrained foundation models to maximally preserves their capabilities, and only trains a simple adapter with just 1\% (156M) of the foundation models' parameters. This adaptation not only leads SLM to achieve strong performance on conventional tasks such as speech recognition (ASR) and speech translation (AST), but also introduces the novel capability of zero-shot instruction-following for more diverse tasks: given a speech input and a text instruction, SLM is able to perform unseen generation tasks including contextual biasing ASR using real-time context, dialog generation, speech continuation, and question answering, etc. Our approach demonstrates that the representational gap between pretrained speech and language models might be narrower than one would expect, and can be bridged by a simple adaptation mechanism. As a result, SLM is not only efficient to train, but also inherits strong capabilities already acquired in foundation models of different modalities.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Prepending or Cross-Attention for Speech-to-Text? An Empirical Comparison

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Across controlled ASR and speech translation experiments, dense feature prepending does not outperform cross-attention in quality and is slightly slower and more memory hungry.

  2. Cloning a Conversational Voice AI Agent from Call\,Recording Datasets for Telesales

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A voice AI agent cloned from call recordings via prompt engineering approaches human performance on routine sales calls but lags on persuasion and objection handling.

Pith tools