Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Dissecting User-Perceived Latency of On-Device E2E Speech Recognition

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.02207 v3 pith:CEP7QOBU submitted 2021-04-06 cs.SD cs.CLeess.AS

classification cs.SDcs.CLeess.AS
keywords latencyspeechmodelrecognitiondevicesendpointingimpactinput
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As speech-enabled devices such as smartphones and smart speakers become increasingly ubiquitous, there is growing interest in building automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems that can run directly on-device; end-to-end (E2E) speech recognition models such as recurrent neural network transducers and their variants have recently emerged as prime candidates for this task. Apart from being accurate and compact, such systems need to decode speech with low user-perceived latency (UPL), producing words as soon as they are spoken. This work examines the impact of various techniques - model architectures, training criteria, decoding hyperparameters, and endpointer parameters - on UPL. Our analyses suggest that measures of model size (parameters, input chunk sizes), or measures of computation (e.g., FLOPS, RTF) that reflect the model's ability to process input frames are not always strongly correlated with observed UPL. Thus, conventional algorithmic latency measurements might be inadequate in accurately capturing latency observed when models are deployed on embedded devices. Instead, we find that factors affecting token emission latency, and endpointing behavior have a larger impact on UPL. We achieve the best trade-off between latency and word error rate when performing ASR jointly with endpointing, while utilizing the recently proposed alignment regularization mechanism.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Delayed-KD: Delayed Knowledge Distillation based CTC for Low-Latency Streaming ASR

    cs.SD 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A Temporal Alignment Buffer with minimum-KL delay selection lets Delayed-KD reach 5.42% CER on AISHELL-1 at 40 ms latency, matching U2++ at 320 ms.

Pith tools