Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

ChestX-Reasoner: Advancing Radiology Foundation Models with Reasoning through Step-by-Step Verification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.20930 v2 pith:CY7RNBPL submitted 2025-04-29 cs.AI cs.CLcs.CV

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.CV
keywords reasoningmedicalchestx-reasonerclinicalmllmmllmsmodelsradiology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in reasoning-enhanced large language models (LLMs) and multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) have significantly improved performance in complex tasks, yet medical AI models often overlook the structured reasoning processes inherent in clinical practice. In this work, we present ChestX-Reasoner, a radiology diagnosis MLLM designed to leverage process supervision mined directly from clinical reports, reflecting the step-by-step reasoning followed by radiologists. We construct a large dataset by extracting and refining reasoning chains from routine radiology reports. Our two-stage training framework combines supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning guided by process rewards to better align model reasoning with clinical standards. We introduce RadRBench-CXR, a comprehensive benchmark featuring 59K visual question answering samples with 301K clinically validated reasoning steps, and propose RadRScore, a metric evaluating reasoning factuality, completeness, and effectiveness. ChestX-Reasoner outperforms existing medical and general-domain MLLMs in both diagnostic accuracy and reasoning ability, achieving 16%, 5.9%, and 18% improvements in reasoning ability compared to the best medical MLLM, the best general MLLM, and its base model, respectively, as well as 3.3%, 24%, and 27% improvements in outcome accuracy. All resources are open-sourced to facilitate further research in medical reasoning MLLMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Positive-Unlabeled Preference Optimization For Chest X-ray Report Generation

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PU-DPO applies positive-unlabeled learning to preference optimization so that report generators learn to mention findings that are present but missing from noisy training reports.

  2. Aligning Clinical Needs and AI Capabilities: A Survey on LLMs for Medical Reasoning

    cs.AI 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A dual clinical-computational taxonomy for medical LLM reasoning plus a five-level 5k-sample benchmark showing specialists excel at diagnosis and general models at decision support/dialogue.

  3. Teaching AI Stepwise Diagnostic Reasoning with Report-Guided Chain-of-Thought Learning

    cs.AI 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    DiagCoT combines supervised fine-tuning, chain-of-thought distillation, and reinforcement learning for chest X-ray diagnosis, but its report-generation gains partly reflect optimizing the evaluation metric itself.

  4. CX-Mind: A Pioneering Multimodal Large Language Model for Interleaved Reasoning in Chest X-ray via Curriculum-Guided Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CX-Mind combines curriculum reinforcement learning and rule-based process rewards to train a chest X-ray vision-language model that produces interleaved think-answer reasoning and reports state-of-the-art results acro...

  5. The Path to Self-Evolving Clinical Systems: Scaling Medical Agents from Assistance to Autonomy

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.5 of 10

    Medical agents should be scaled mainly by richer clinical environments and self-evolution loops, not parameter growth alone, under a three-level autonomy taxonomy.

  6. Reinforcement Fine-Tuning Powers Reasoning Capability of Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey-style position paper claims that reinforcement fine-tuning powers reasoning in multimodal LLMs, summarizing over a hundred recent works and proposing five future research directions.

Pith tools