On the parabolic and hyperbolic Liouville equations

Tadahiro Oh; Tristan Robert; Yuzhao Wang

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

On the parabolic and hyperbolic Liouville equations

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Exponential-noise heat and wave equations solved up to sharp β² thresholds

desk verdict A genuinely strong paper on singular stochastic PDEs with a real gap in the hyperbolic Gibbs theorem that a referee can likely repair. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03944 v3 pith:DEI3W5RB submitted 2019-08-11 math.AP math-phmath.MPmath.PR

Tadahiro Oh , Tristan Robert , Yuzhao Wang This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.APmath-phmath.MPmath.PR MSC 35L7135K1560H15

keywords stochasticnonlinearheatequationdampedwaveexponentialnonlinearityGaussianmultiplicativechaosGibbsmeasureinvariancerenormalizedLiouvillerandomdatawell-posedness

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies two-dimensional stochastic heat and damped wave equations with the exponential nonlinearity $\lambda\beta e^{\beta u}$, driven by additive space-time white noise. After renormalizing the exponential by subtracting its divergent variance, it proves local well-posedness for the heat equation up to $\beta^2<8\pi/(3+2\sqrt2)$, global well-posedness in the defocusing case $\lambda>0$ up to $\beta^2<4\pi$, and local well-posedness for the damped wave equation up to the smaller threshold $\beta^2<(32-16\sqrt3)\pi/5$. For $\lambda>0$, the paper constructs the renormalized Gibbs measures for both models and shows they are invariant under the dynamics, giving almost sure global well-posedness for Gibbs-distributed initial data. The hyperbolic statement, translated to deterministic nonlinear wave equations with random data, answers an open question left by earlier work on exponential wave equations. The interest is that these are the parabolic and hyperbolic stochastic quantization equations for the exponential-interaction field, where the exponential nonlinearity makes every moment of the driving noise contribute.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the renormalized exponential of the stochastic convolution, $\Theta_N=:e^{\beta\Psi_N}: = e^{-\beta^2\sigma_N/2}e^{\beta\Psi_N}$, whose $L^p$ regularity is controlled by moment bounds on Gaussian multiplicative chaos. The argument splits the solution as $u = v + z + \Psi$ (stochastic convolution plus deterministic linear evolution plus residual), reducing the equation to a fixed point driven by $\Theta_N$; for the wave equation the residual is split again, $v=X+Y$, where $X$ gains a sign-definite structure under the essentially non-negative wave kernel and $Y$ gains two derivatives from the difference of the damped and undamped propagators. Dispersive and energy estimates, a compactness lemma, and a product lemma for positive distributions carry the proof, and the invariant-measure argument supplies the global wave dynamics.

What would settle it

Complete the omitted invariant-measure step for the truncated damped wave equation: either establish the uniform-in-$N$ a priori bounds and compactness needed to extract a global flow, or exhibit some $0<\beta^2<\beta^2_{\rm wave}$ for which those bounds diverge as $N\to\infty$; the latter would disprove Theorem 1.9.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the two-dimensional Liouville equations with exponential nonlinearity admit a complete renormalized solution theory whose thresholds are set by the regularity of Gaussian multiplicative chaos: $\beta^2_{\rm heat}=8\pi/(3+2\sqrt2)$ arises by optimizing the smoothing exponent against the moment order needed for contraction, and $\beta^2_{\rm wave}=(32-16\sqrt3)\pi/5$ arises from a further split of the residual wave component into a sign-definite rough part and a smoother part. In the defocusing case the positivity of the chaos and a sign-definite structure make the nonlinearity bounded, extending heat well-posedness to $4\pi$ and yielding invariant measures. The convergence statements are made in the strong sense of convergence in probability of the truncated solutions, including continuity in the noise, which was missing in prior local heat results.

Load-bearing premise

The proof of the wave Gibbs-invariance theorem assumes, without demonstrating, that the standard invariant-measure argument applies to the truncated damped wave flow; if that adaptation fails, the claimed almost sure global well-posedness and invariance of $\rho_{\rm wave}$ do not follow from the local estimates alone.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For $\lambda>0$ and $0<\beta^2<4\pi$, the renormalized heat dynamics is globally well-posed and the renormalized Gibbs measure, mutually absolutely continuous with the massive Gaussian free field, is invariant.
For $0<\beta^2<\beta^2_{\rm wave}$, the damped wave equation with Gibbs-distributed data is almost surely globally well-posed and $\rho_{\rm wave}$ is invariant.
Translated to deterministic initial data, the wave result gives almost sure global well-posedness for the nonlinear wave equation with $e^{\beta u}$ and invariance of the Gibbs measure, settling the previously open two-dimensional case.
The local heat result applies to the sinh-Gordon equation, yielding local well-posedness with continuity in the noise for $0<\beta^2<8\pi/(3+2\sqrt2)$ and, via the invariant-measure argument, almost sure global well-posedness with an invariant renormalized cosh-interaction Gibbs measure.
For the undamped wave equation, the small-time variance growth $t\log N$ allows local well-posedness for every $\beta^2>0$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same even-moment route via the multilinear inequality behind the chaos bounds may transfer to other log-correlated non-polynomial nonlinearities whenever the correlation kernel decouples into two-point products; this is an extension, not asserted in the paper.
The wave-side dichotomy of a rough sign-definite part plus a smoother remainder is a template for oscillatory propagators whose kernels are only non-negative near the singularity; testing it on other dispersive equations with positive near-field kernels would be a natural next step.
The thresholds here are sharp for the method, not for the equation; a testable question is whether the $X/Y$ split can be pushed past $0.86\pi$ with additional smoothing or different function spaces.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: this paper earns its length. The local well-posedness for the damped wave equation with exponential nonlinearity (Theorem 1.8) and the parabolic global/invariance results are supported by careful, detailed estimates; the X+Y decomposition is a genuine idea and the Brascamp-Lieb moment bounds are a solid contribution. But Theorem 1.9, the almost sure global well-posedness and Gibbs invariance for the wave equation, has a real gap in the written proof.

What is new: the improvement over Garban's heat result (noise continuity, larger beta^2 range), the defocusing global heat result up to 4pi, and the wave local theory for beta^2<0.86pi which answers the Sun-Tzvetkov open problem in that regime. The structure of the proof is coherent: Da Prato-Debussche, then the rough/smooth split of the residual term, with the sign-definite part controlled by positivity of the wave kernel and the smooth part gaining two derivatives. The estimates in Sections 4 through 6.1 appear correct to me; the parameter choices are internally consistent.

The soft spot is Section 6.2. The truncated system (6.25) is stated with initial data (Q_N w0, Q_N w1), but the decomposition u_N = X_N + Y_N + Psi uses the untruncated stochastic convolution Psi with initial data (w0,w1). That forces (X_N+Y_N)(0) = (Q_N-I)w0 and a nonzero time derivative, whereas the Duhamel formulas in (6.26) define X_N,Y_N with zero initial data. The paper does not address this residual initial data. Moreover, the passage to global-in-time dynamics and invariance via Bourgain's invariant measure argument is deferred by 'Since it is standard, we omit details.' That adaptation is not automatic for this sign-definite truncated system, especially with the Q_N cutoffs, and it carries the full weight of Theorem 1.9.

Neither issue looks fatal: one can redefine Psi with Q_N initial data, or absorb the linear evolution of (Q_N-I)w0 into X_N+Y_N, and Bourgain's argument has been implemented in similar wave settings (the paper cites [65, 37, 59, 15, 60]). But as written, Theorem 1.9 is conditional on repairs.

Bottom line: this is a strong paper for the local theories and the parabolic Gibbs program. The hyperbolic global/invariance theorem needs referee attention. I'd send it to peer review; a good referee can ask for the fix rather than a full rewrite.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper develops a local and global solution theory for the two-dimensional stochastic nonlinear heat equation (1.1) and the stochastic damped nonlinear wave equation (1.2), both with an exponential nonlinearity λβe^{βu} and additive space-time white noise. In the parabolic case it proves local well-posedness for general λ≠0 and 0<β²<8π/(3+2√2), global well-posedness for λ>0 and β²<4π, and invariance of the renormalized Gibbs measure for λ>0 in that range. In the hyperbolic case it proves local well-posedness for λ>0 and 0<β²<(32−16√3)π/5≈0.86π, and asserts almost sure global well-posedness and Gibbs invariance for the same β-range. The arguments combine the Da Prato–Debussche trick with new moment bounds for Gaussian multiplicative chaos obtained by Brascamp–Lieb and Kahane inequalities, a sign-definite structure in the defocusing case, and an X+Y decomposition of the residual wave dynamics.

Significance. If fully established, these results constitute a substantial advance: they extend Garban's range with noise continuity, give the first Gibbs-invariant dynamics for the damped wave equation with exponential nonlinearity in this β-regime, and answer the Sun–Tzvetkov open question for α=1. The paper is unusually detailed in the deterministic estimates: Proposition 1.12 is proved by two independent methods, the threshold computations in §§4 and 6.1 are explicit, and the local statements in Theorems 1.1, 1.2, and 1.8 are supported by self-contained proofs. However, the hyperbolic global result (Theorem 1.9) is not proved in the text: it depends on an omitted Bourgain invariant-measure argument and, more concretely, on an initial-data mismatch between the truncated system under study and the system whose invariant measure is ρ_wave,N. The parabolic global result (Theorem 1.6) is fully argued and does not share this gap.

major comments (2)

[§6.2, Eqs. (6.25)–(6.26) and (1.36)] The truncated system analyzed in (6.26) is not literally the system (6.25) whose invariant measure is ρ_wave,N. Indeed, (6.25) is stated with initial data (Q_N w0, Q_N w1), while the decomposition u_N = X_N + Y_N + Ψ uses the untruncated stochastic convolution Ψ from (1.36), whose initial data are (w0, w1). Consequently (X_N + Y_N)(0) = (Q_N − Id)w0 and ∂_t(X_N + Y_N)(0) = (Q_N − Id)w1, whereas the Duhamel integrals in (6.26) define X_N and Y_N with zero initial data. This is a concrete inconsistency, not merely a cosmetic one: the well-posedness and convergence statements proved for (6.26) do not automatically transfer to the dynamics (6.25) started from the truncated Gibbs measure. The gap appears repairable, for example by using a truncated stochastic convolution Ψ_N with initial data (Q_N w0, Q_N w1), or by adding the linear evolution of (Q_N − Id)(w0, w1) to the residual, but as written the proof of Theorem 1.9 does not cover the stated dynamics.
[§6.2, paragraph after (6.28)] Theorem 1.9's almost sure global well-posedness and invariance of ρ_wave rest on the sentence 'The rest of the argument follows from applying Bourgain's invariant measure argument [9,10]. Since it is standard, we omit details.' This step is load-bearing: it must produce (i) a set of full ρ_wave-measure on which the truncated dynamics have a uniform local existence time, (ii) a Borel–Cantelli argument to pass to a global flow, and (iii) invariance of the limiting measure. None of these is demonstrated for the specific damped wave system with exponential nonlinearity, and the sign-definite structure used earlier in Section 6 does not by itself provide the needed uniform control of escape times. The authors should either supply the full argument or explicitly reformulate Theorem 1.9 as conditional on it.

minor comments (3)

[§5.2, Eqs. (5.27)–(5.29)] In the definition of Θ_{N,M} and R_{N,M} around (5.28)–(5.29), the projector P_N appears where the text has introduced a second truncation parameter M in (5.27); this should presumably be P_M for consistency.
[Throughout] There are numerous typographical artifacts in the extracted text (e.g., 'equ ation', 'well-pose dness', 'approx imation'), and the notation H^s(T2) for the product space is defined only in §2.1; a unified notation table would help.
[§4, Proposition 4.1 and Remark 4.2] The proof of Proposition 4.1 states that continuity in initial data 'follows from a standard argument' and uniqueness in the whole space is relegated to Remark 4.2; these are acceptable but should be made explicit, especially because the map is only shown to be a contraction on a ball of radius O(1).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the main theorems are derived from in-paper Gaussian multiplicative chaos estimates and deterministic contraction/energy arguments; Theorem 1.9 has an omitted standard Bourgain step and a residual-initial-data mismatch, but these are proof gaps, not circular reductions.

full rationale

Walking the proof chain, the central stochastic object is constructed inside the paper: Section 3 builds the renormalized Gaussian multiplicative chaos Theta_N from Psi_N and proves the moment bounds and convergence statements used later (Propositions 1.12, 3.2, 3.6). The parabolic results are then obtained from a contraction argument for the residual equation (Proposition 4.1) and from the sign-definite energy argument in Section 5. The hyperbolic results are obtained by reducing the Da Prato--Debussche residual to the system (6.1), solved by contraction in X x Y spaces using Strichartz estimates and the extra smoothing of D(t)-e^{-t/2}S(t) (Lemmas 2.6 and 2.8). The thresholds beta^2_heat = 8pi/(3+2sqrt(2)) and beta^2_wave = (32-16sqrt(3))pi/5 are obtained by optimizing constraints on admissible parameters, not by fitting constants to the desired conclusions. Cited prior work by the same authors is auxiliary rather than load-bearing: for instance, Lemma 2.2 is quoted from [63] as a standard Bessel-kernel fact, and the sine-Gordon comparisons in Remark 1.19 are contextual. I found no equation in which an output quantity is identical to an input quantity by definition, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The manuscript itself flags an omitted proof in Section 6.2: 'The rest of the argument follows from applying Bourgain's invariant measure argument [9,10]. Since it is standard, we omit details.' That makes the written proof of Theorem 1.9 conditional on a standard but unverified adaptation, and there is a concrete mismatch: (6.25) uses initial data (Q_N w_0, Q_N w_1), while the decomposition in (6.26) uses Psi_wave from (1.36), which starts from (w_0, w_1), leaving the residual with nonzero initial data. These are correctness and completeness gaps, not circularity: they do not reduce Theorem 1.9 to its own assumptions or to a self-citation. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; all thresholds are derived. The dominant external inputs are standard mathematical tools and one deferred standard method (Bourgain's argument) whose applicability to the truncated exponential wave dynamics is asserted rather than demonstrated.

assumptions (5)

standard math Kahane's convexity inequality (Lemma 3.4) for Gaussian multiplicative chaos
Used in Section 3.3 and Appendix B to obtain uniform moment bounds on the GMC random measure. Stated as a known result from [46,71,72].
standard math Brascamp-Lieb inequality (Lemma 2.11, Corollary 2.12)
Used in Section 3.2 to prove even moment bounds for the GMC. Invoked as a known theorem from [8].
standard math Strichartz estimates for the linear wave equation on the torus (Lemma 2.8)
Used in Section 6 for the X+Y system. Stated without proof, justified by finite speed of propagation from the Euclidean case.
standard math Aubin-Lions compactness lemma (Lemma 2.16)
Used in Sections 4, 5, 6 for convergence of subsequences. Standard functional analysis result.
domain assumption Bourgain's invariant measure argument [9,10] can be applied to the truncated SdNLW dynamics (6.25) to obtain Theorem 1.9
The paper states 'The rest of the argument follows from applying Bourgain's invariant measure argument... Since it is standard, we omit details.' This is a load-bearing unproved step for the global wave dynamics and Gibbs invariance.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the parabolic and hyperbolic Liouville equations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DEI3W5RB

@misc{pith2026190803944,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the parabolic and hyperbolic Liouville equations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DEI3W5RB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03944}
}

abstract

We study the two-dimensional stochastic nonlinear heat equation (SNLH) and stochastic damped nonlinear wave equation (SdNLW) with an exponential nonlinearity $\lambda\beta e^{\beta u }$, forced by an additive space-time white noise. We prove local and global well-posedness of these equations, depending on the sign of $\lambda$ and the size of $\beta^2 > 0$, and invariance of the associated Gibbs measures. See the abstract of the paper for a more precise abstract. (Due to the limit on the number of characters for an abstract set by arXiv, the full abstract can not be displayed here.)

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Comparing the stochastic nonlinear wave and heat equations: a case study
math.AP 2019-08 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

For the quadratic stochastic nonlinear wave and heat equations on the two-dimensional torus, standard Da Prato-Debussche solution theory fails at noise roughness alpha = 1/2 (wave) and alpha = 1 (heat), before the sca...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

The elliptic stochastic quantization of some two dimensional Euclidean QFTs

S. Albeverio, F.C. De Vecchi, M. Gubinelli, The elliptic stochastic quantization of some two dimension al Euclidean QFTs , arXiv:1906.11187v4 [math.PR]

work page Pith review arXiv 1906
[2]

Albeverio, R

S. Albeverio, R. Høegh-Krohn, The Wightman axioms and the mass gap for strong interactions of exponential type in two-dimensional space-time , J. Functional Analysis 16 (1974), no. 1, 39–82

work page 1974
[3]

Albeverio, H

S. Albeverio, H. Kawabi, M. R¨ ockner, Strong uniqueness for both Dirichlet operators and stochas tic dynamics to Gibbs measures on a path space with exponential i nteractions, J. Funct. Anal. 262 (2012), no. 2, 602–638

work page 2012
[4]

Albeverio, M

S. Albeverio, M. Yoshida, H-C 1 maps and elliptic SPDEs with polynomial and exponential per turbations of Nelson ’s Euclidean free ﬁeld, J. Funct. Anal. 196 (2002), no. 2, 265–322

work page 2002
[5]

Aronszajn, K

N. Aronszajn, K. Smith, Theory of Bessel potentials. I, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 11 (1961), 385– 475

work page 1961
[6]

Aubin, Un th´ eor` eme de compacit´ e,C

J.-P. Aubin, Un th´ eor` eme de compacit´ e,C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 256 (1963), 5042–5044

work page 1963
[7]

Bacry, J

E. Bacry, J. F. Muzy, Log-inﬁnitely divisible multifractal processes , Comm. Math. Phys. 236 (2003), no. 3, 449–475

work page 2003
[8]

Bennett, A

J. Bennett, A. Carbery, M. Christ, T. Tao. The Brascamp–Lieb inequalities: ﬁniteness, structure and rxtremals, Geom. Funct. Anal. 17 (2008), no 5, 1343–1415

work page 2008

Show all 79 references

[9]

Bourgain, Periodic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation and invariant measures, Comm

J. Bourgain, Periodic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation and invariant measures, Comm. Math. Phys. 166 (1994), 1–26

1994
[10]

Bourgain, Invariant measures for the 2D-defocusing nonlinear Schr¨ o dinger equation , Comm

J. Bourgain, Invariant measures for the 2D-defocusing nonlinear Schr¨ o dinger equation , Comm. Math. Phys. 176 (1996), 421–445

1996
[11]

Bourgain, Invariant measures for NLS in inﬁnite volume, Comm

J. Bourgain, Invariant measures for NLS in inﬁnite volume, Comm. Math. Phys. 210 (2000), no. 3, 605–620

2000
[12]

Bourgain, A

J. Bourgain, A. Bulut, Almost sure global well posedness for the radial nonlinear S chr¨ odinger equation on the unit ball I: the 2D case , Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire 31 (2014), no. 6, 1267–1288

2014
[13]

Brascamp, E

H. Brascamp, E. Lieb, Best constants in Young’s inequality, its converse, and its generalization to more than three functions , Advances in Math. 20 (1976), no. 2, 151–173

1976
[14]

Brascamp, E

H. Brascamp, E. Lieb, On extensions of the Brunn-Minkowski and Pr´ ekopa-Leindler theorems, including inequalities for log concave functions, and with an applica tion to the diﬀusion equation, J. Functional Analysis 22 (1976), no. 4, 366–389. 68 T. OH, T. ROBERT, AND Y. W ANG

1976
[15]

Bringmann, Invariant Gibbs measures for the three-dimensional wave eq uation with a Hartree non- linearity II: dynamics , arXiv:2009.04616 [math.AP]

B. Bringmann, Invariant Gibbs measures for the three-dimensional wave eq uation with a Hartree non- linearity II: dynamics , arXiv:2009.04616 [math.AP]

2009 arXiv
[16]

Brydges, G

D. Brydges, G. Slade, Statistical mechanics of the 2-dimensional focusing nonli near Schr¨ odinger equa- tion, Comm. Math. Phys. 182 (1996), no. 2, 485–504

1996
[17]

Catellier, K

R. Catellier, K. Chouk, Paracontrolled distributions and the 3-dimensional stoch astic quantization equa- tion, Ann. Probab. 46 (2018), no. 5, 2621–2679

2018
[18]

Christ, M

M. Christ, M. Weinstein, Dispersion of small amplitude solutions of the generalized Korteweg-de Vries equation. J. Funct. Anal. 100 (1991), no. 1, 87–109

1991
[19]

Chandra, M

A. Chandra, M. Hairer, H. Shen, The dynamical sine-Gordon model in the full subcritical reg ime, arXiv:1808.02594 [math.PR]

arXiv
[20]

Da Prato, A

G. Da Prato, A. Debussche, Strong solutions to the stochastic quantization equations , Ann. Probab. 31 (2003), no. 4, 1900–1916

2003
[21]

David, A

F. David, A. Kupiainen, R. Rhodes, V. Vargas, Liouville quantum gravity on the Riemann sphere, Comm. Math. Phys. 342 (2016), no. 3, 869–907

2016
[22]

David, R

F. David, R. Rhodes, V. Vargas, Liouville quantum gravity on complex tori, J. Math. Phys. 57 (2016), no. 2, 022302, 25 pp

2016
[23]

Deya, A nonlinear wave equation with fractional perturbation , Ann

A. Deya, A nonlinear wave equation with fractional perturbation , Ann. Probab. 47 (2019), no. 3, 1775– 1810

2019
[24]

Deya, On a non-linear 2D fractional wave equation , Ann

A. Deya, On a non-linear 2D fractional wave equation , Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat. 56 (2020), no. 1, 477–501

2020
[25]

Dub´ edat, H

J. Dub´ edat, H. Shen, Stochastic Ricci ﬂow on compact surfaces , arXiv:1904.10909 [math.PR]

1904 arXiv
[26]

Duplantier, S

B. Duplantier, S. Sheﬃeld, Liouville quantum gravity and KPZ , Invent. Math. 185 (2011), no. 2, 333– 393

2011
[27]

W. E., A. Jentzen, H. Shen, Renormalized powers of Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes and w ell-posedness of stochastic Ginzburg-Landau equations, Nonlinear Anal. 142 (2016), 152–193

2016
[28]

Evans, Partial diﬀerential equations, Second edition

L.C. Evans, Partial diﬀerential equations, Second edition. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, 19. Amer- ican Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010. xxii+749 pp

2010
[29]

Folland, Real analysis

G. Folland, Real analysis. Modern techniques and their applications. Second edition. Pure and Applied Mathematics (New York). A Wiley-Interscience Publication . John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1999. xvi+386 pp

1999
[30]

Garban, Dynamical Liouville , J

C. Garban, Dynamical Liouville , J. Funct. Anal. 278 (2020), no. 6, 108351, 54 pp

2020
[31]

Gatto, Product rule and chain rule estimates for fractional deriva tives on spaces that satisfy the doubling condition , J

A.E. Gatto, Product rule and chain rule estimates for fractional deriva tives on spaces that satisfy the doubling condition , J. Funct. Anal. 188 (2002), no. 1, 27–37

2002
[32]

Ginibre, G

J. Ginibre, G. Velo, Generalized Strichartz inequalities for the wave equation , J. Funct. Anal. 133 (1995), no. 1, 50–68

1995
[33]

Grafakos, Classical Fourier analysis , Third edition

L. Grafakos, Classical Fourier analysis , Third edition. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 249. Spring er, New York, 2014. xviii+638 pp

2014
[34]

Gubinelli, P

M. Gubinelli, P. Imkeller, N. Perkowski, Paracontrolled distributions and singular PDEs, Forum Math. Pi 3 (2015), e6, 75 pp

2015
[35]

Gubinelli, H

M. Gubinelli, H. Koch, T. Oh, Renormalization of the two-dimensional stochastic nonlin ear wave equa- tion, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 370 (2018), 7335–7359

2018
[36]

Gubinelli, H

M. Gubinelli, H. Koch, T. Oh, Paracontrolled approach to the three-dimensional stochas tic nonlinear wave equation with quadratic nonlinearity , to appear in J. Eur. Math. Soc
[37]

Gubinelli, H

M. Gubinelli, H. Koch, T. Oh, L. Tolomeo, Global dynamics for the two-dimensional stochastic nonlin ear wave equations, to appear in Internat. Math. Res. Not
[38]

Hairer, Solving the KPZ equation , Ann

M. Hairer, Solving the KPZ equation , Ann. of Math. 178 (2013), no. 2, 559–664

2013
[39]

Hairer, A theory of regularity structures, Invent

M. Hairer, A theory of regularity structures, Invent. Math. 198 (2014), no. 2, 269–504

2014
[40]

Hairer, K

M. Hairer, K. Matetski, Discretisations of rough stochastic PDEs , Ann. Probab. 46 (2018), no. 3, 1651–1709

2018
[41]

Hairer, M.D

M. Hairer, M.D. Ryser, H. Weber, Triviality of the 2D stochastic Allen-Cahn equation , Electron. J. Probab. 17 (2012), no. 39, 14 pp

2012
[42]

Hairer, H

M. Hairer, H. Shen, The dynamical sine-Gordon model , Comm. Math. Phys. 341 (2016), no. 3, 933–989

2016
[43]

Høegh-Krohn, A general class of quantum ﬁelds without cut-oﬀs in two space- time dimensions, Comm

R. Høegh-Krohn, A general class of quantum ﬁelds without cut-oﬀs in two space- time dimensions, Comm. Math. Phys. 21 (1971), 244–255

1971
[44]

Hoshino, H

M. Hoshino, H. Kawabi, S. Kusuoka, Stochastic quantization associated with the exp(Φ) 2-quantum ﬁeld model driven by space-time white noise on the torus, J. Evol. Equ. 21 (2021), no. 1, 339–375. PARABOLIC AND HYPERBOLIC LIOUVILLE EQUATIONS 69

2021
[45]

Hoshino, H

M. Hoshino, H. Kawabi, S. Kusuoka, Stochastic quantization associated with the exp(Φ) 2-quantum ﬁeld model driven by space-time white noise on the torus in the ful lL1-regime, arXiv:2007.08171 [math.PR]

2007 arXiv
[46]

Kahane, Sur le chaos multiplicatif, Ann

J.-P. Kahane, Sur le chaos multiplicatif, Ann. Sci. Math. Qu´ ebec, 9 (1985), no.2 105–150

1985
[47]

Kato, On nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations

T. Kato, On nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations. II. H s-solutions and unconditional well-posedness , J. Anal. Math. 67 (1995), 281–306

1995
[48]

M. Keel, T. Tao, Endpoint Strichartz estimates , Amer. J. Math. 120 (1998), no. 5, 955–980

1998
[49]

Kupiainen, Renormalization group and stochastic PDEs, Ann

A. Kupiainen, Renormalization group and stochastic PDEs, Ann. Henri Poincar´ e 17 (2016), no. 3, 497–535

2016
[50]

Lacoin, R

H. Lacoin, R. Rhodes, V. Vargas, Complex Gaussian multiplicative chaos , Comm. Math. Phys. 337 (2015), no. 2, 569–632

2015
[51]

Lebowitz, H

J. Lebowitz, H. Rose, E. Speer, Statistical mechanics of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, J. Statist. Phys. 50 (1988), no. 3-4, 657–687

1988
[52]

Lieb, Gaussian kernels have only Gaussian maximizers, Invent

E. Lieb, Gaussian kernels have only Gaussian maximizers, Invent. Math. 102 (1990), no. 1, 179–208

1990
[53]

Lindblad, C

H. Lindblad, C. Sogge, On existence and scattering with minimal regularity for sem ilinear wave equa- tions, J. Funct. Anal. 130 (1995), no 2, 357–426

1995
[54]

McKean, Statistical mechanics of nonlinear wave equations

H.P. McKean, Statistical mechanics of nonlinear wave equations. IV. Cub ic Schr¨ odinger,Comm. Math. Phys. 168 (1995), no. 3, 479–491. Erratum: Statistical mechanics of nonlinear wave equation s. IV. Cubic Schr¨ odinger, Comm. Math. Phys. 173 (1995), no. 3, 675

1995
[55]

Mourrat, H

J.-C. Mourrat, H. Weber, The dynamic Φ 4 3 model comes down from inﬁnity , Comm. Math. Phys. 356 (2017), no. 3, 673–753

2017
[56]

Mourrat, H

J.-C. Mourrat, H. Weber, W. Xu, Construction of Φ 4 3 diagrams for pedestrians, From particle systems to partial diﬀerential equations, 1–46, Springer Proc. Mat h. Stat., 209, Springer, Cham, 2017

2017
[57]

T. Oh, M. Okamoto, Comparing the stochastic nonlinear wave and heat equations : a case study, Elec- tron. J. Probab. 26 (2021), paper no. 9, 44 pp

2021
[58]

T. Oh, M. Okamoto, T. Robert, A remark on triviality for the two-dimensional stochastic n onlinear wave equation, Stochastic Process. Appl. 130 (2020), no. 9, 5838–5864

2020
[59]

T. Oh, M. Okamoto, L. Tolomeo Focusing Φ 4 3-model with a Hartree-type nonlinearity , arXiv:2009.03251 [math.PR]

2009 arXiv
[60]

T. Oh, M. Okamoto, L. Tolomeo, Stochastic quantization of the Φ 3 3-model, preprint
[61]

T. Oh, M. Okamoto, N. Tzvetkov, Uniqueness and non-uniqueness of the Gaussian free ﬁeld evo lution under the two-dimensional Wick ordered cubic wave equation , preprint
[62]

T. Oh, O. Pocovnicu, N. Tzvetkov, Probabilistic local well-posedness of the cubic nonlinear wave equa- tion in negative Sobolev spaces , to appear in Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble)
[63]

T. Oh, T. Robert, P. Sosoe, Y. Wang, On the two-dimensional hyperbolic stochastic sine-Gordon equa- tion, Stoch PDE: Anal Comp 9 (2021), 1–32

2021
[64]

T. Oh, T. Robert, P. Sosoe, Y. Wang, Invariant Gibbs dynamics for the dynamical sine-Gordon mod el, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Section A Mat hematics, 1-17. doi:10.1017/prm.2020.68

2020 doi
[65]

T. Oh, T. Robert, N. Tzvetkov, Stochastic nonlinear wave dynamics on compact surfaces , arXiv:1904.05277 [math.AP]

1904 arXiv
[66]

T. Oh, T. Robert, N. Tzvetkov, Y. Wang, Stochastic quantization of Liouville conformal ﬁeld theor y, arXiv:2004.04194 [math.AP]

2004 arXiv
[67]

T. Oh, K. Seong, L. Tolomeo, A remark on Gibbs measures with log-correlated Gaussian ﬁel ds, arXiv:2012.06729 [math.PR]

2012 arXiv
[68]

T. Oh, P. Sosoe, L. Tolomeo, Optimal integrability threshold for Gibbs measures associ ated with focusing NLS on the torus, arXiv:1709.02045 [math.PR]

arXiv
[69]

T. Oh, L. Thomann, Invariant Gibbs measure for the 2- d defocusing nonlinear wave equations , Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. 29 (2020), no. 1, 1–26

2020
[70]

Parisi, Y.S

G. Parisi, Y.S. Wu, Perturbation theory without gauge ﬁxing , Sci. Sinica 24 (1981), no. 4, 483–496

1981
[71]

Rhodes, V

R. Rhodes, V. Vargas, Gaussian multiplicative chaos and applications: a review , Probab. Surv. 11 (2014), 315–392

2014
[72]

Robert, V

R. Robert, V. Vargas, Gaussian multiplicative chaos revisited , Ann. Probab. 38 (2010), no. 2, 605–631

2010
[73]

Robert, Invariant Gibbs measure for a Schr¨ odinger equation with ex ponential nonlinearity , arXiv:2104.14348 [math.AP]

T. Robert, Invariant Gibbs measure for a Schr¨ odinger equation with ex ponential nonlinearity , arXiv:2104.14348 [math.AP]

arXiv
[74]

Ryang, T

S. Ryang, T. Saito, K. Shigemoto, Canonical stochastic quantization , Progr. Theoret. Phys. 73 (1985), no. 5, 1295–1298

1985
[75]

Simon, Compact sets in the space Lp(0,T ;B), Ann

J. Simon, Compact sets in the space Lp(0,T ;B), Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 146 (1987), no 1, 65–96. 70 T. OH, T. ROBERT, AND Y. W ANG

1987
[76]

Staﬃlani, The initial value problem for some dispersive diﬀerential eq uations, Thesis (Ph.D.) – The University of Chicago

G. Staﬃlani, The initial value problem for some dispersive diﬀerential eq uations, Thesis (Ph.D.) – The University of Chicago. 1995. 88 pp

1995
[77]

C. Sun, N. Tzvetkov, New examples of probabilistic well-posedness for nonlinea r wave equations , J. Funct. Anal. 278 (2020), no. 2, 108322, 47 pp

2020
[78]

Taylor, Tools for PDE, Pseudodiﬀerential operators, paradiﬀerential operator s, and layer potentials

M. Taylor, Tools for PDE, Pseudodiﬀerential operators, paradiﬀerential operator s, and layer potentials. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 81. American Mathema tical Society, Providence, RI, 2000. x+257 pp

2000
[79]

N. Tzvetkov, Invariant measures for the defocusing Nonlinear Schr¨ odin ger equation (Mesures invari- antes pour l’´ equation de Schr¨ odinger non lin´ eaire),Annales de l’Institut Fourier, 58 (2008), 2543–2604. Tadahiro Oh, School of Mathematics, The University of Edinb urgh,...

2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

The elliptic stochastic quantization of some two dimensional Euclidean QFTs

S. Albeverio, F.C. De Vecchi, M. Gubinelli, The elliptic stochastic quantization of some two dimension al Euclidean QFTs , arXiv:1906.11187v4 [math.PR]

work page Pith review arXiv 1906

[2] [2]

Albeverio, R

S. Albeverio, R. Høegh-Krohn, The Wightman axioms and the mass gap for strong interactions of exponential type in two-dimensional space-time , J. Functional Analysis 16 (1974), no. 1, 39–82

work page 1974

[3] [3]

Albeverio, H

S. Albeverio, H. Kawabi, M. R¨ ockner, Strong uniqueness for both Dirichlet operators and stochas tic dynamics to Gibbs measures on a path space with exponential i nteractions, J. Funct. Anal. 262 (2012), no. 2, 602–638

work page 2012

[4] [4]

Albeverio, M

S. Albeverio, M. Yoshida, H-C 1 maps and elliptic SPDEs with polynomial and exponential per turbations of Nelson ’s Euclidean free ﬁeld, J. Funct. Anal. 196 (2002), no. 2, 265–322

work page 2002

[5] [5]

Aronszajn, K

N. Aronszajn, K. Smith, Theory of Bessel potentials. I, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 11 (1961), 385– 475

work page 1961

[6] [6]

Aubin, Un th´ eor` eme de compacit´ e,C

J.-P. Aubin, Un th´ eor` eme de compacit´ e,C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 256 (1963), 5042–5044

work page 1963

[7] [7]

Bacry, J

E. Bacry, J. F. Muzy, Log-inﬁnitely divisible multifractal processes , Comm. Math. Phys. 236 (2003), no. 3, 449–475

work page 2003

[8] [8]

Bennett, A

J. Bennett, A. Carbery, M. Christ, T. Tao. The Brascamp–Lieb inequalities: ﬁniteness, structure and rxtremals, Geom. Funct. Anal. 17 (2008), no 5, 1343–1415

work page 2008