Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Multi-Level Compositional Reasoning for Interactive Instruction Following

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.09387 v2 pith:DLME6Q7N submitted 2023-08-18 cs.RO cs.AI

classification cs.ROcs.AI
keywords policyinteractionlevelnavigationsubgoalsagentagentscompositional
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Robotic agents performing domestic chores by natural language directives are required to master the complex job of navigating environment and interacting with objects in the environments. The tasks given to the agents are often composite thus are challenging as completing them require to reason about multiple subtasks, e.g., bring a cup of coffee. To address the challenge, we propose to divide and conquer it by breaking the task into multiple subgoals and attend to them individually for better navigation and interaction. We call it Multi-level Compositional Reasoning Agent (MCR-Agent). Specifically, we learn a three-level action policy. At the highest level, we infer a sequence of human-interpretable subgoals to be executed based on language instructions by a high-level policy composition controller. At the middle level, we discriminatively control the agent's navigation by a master policy by alternating between a navigation policy and various independent interaction policies. Finally, at the lowest level, we infer manipulation actions with the corresponding object masks using the appropriate interaction policy. Our approach not only generates human interpretable subgoals but also achieves 2.03% absolute gain to comparable state of the arts in the efficiency metric (PLWSR in unseen set) without using rule-based planning or a semantic spatial memory.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hindsight Planner: A Closed-Loop Few-Shot Planner for Embodied Instruction Following

    cs.AI 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A few-shot LLM planner for ALFRED that relabels suboptimal trajectories with hindsight prompts reaches 25.51 SR on Test Seen, approaching or beating the full-shot HLSM baseline.

Pith tools