No Free Lunch in LLM Watermarking: Trade-offs in Watermarking Design Choices
read the original abstract
Advances in generative models have made it possible for AI-generated text, code, and images to mirror human-generated content in many applications. Watermarking, a technique that aims to embed information in the output of a model to verify its source, is useful for mitigating the misuse of such AI-generated content. However, we show that common design choices in LLM watermarking schemes make the resulting systems surprisingly susceptible to attack -- leading to fundamental trade-offs in robustness, utility, and usability. To navigate these trade-offs, we rigorously study a set of simple yet effective attacks on common watermarking systems, and propose guidelines and defenses for LLM watermarking in practice.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Linear Ensembles Wash Away Watermarks: On the Fragility of Distributional Perturbations in LLMs
Averaging output distributions across 3-5 LLMs recovers the unwatermarked distribution, suppressing detection z-scores below threshold while improving quality.
-
Position: LLM Watermarking Should Align Stakeholders' Incentives for Practical Adoption
LLM watermarking adoption is limited by misaligned stakeholder incentives; incentive-aligned approaches such as in-context watermarking can enable practical use in targeted domains like education and peer review.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.