Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Causality for Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.15319 v1 pith:EBD3T2QP submitted 2024-10-20 cs.CL cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.CLcs.AIstat.ML
keywords llmscausalmodelscausalitylanguageactivateaddressbuild
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent breakthroughs in artificial intelligence have driven a paradigm shift, where large language models (LLMs) with billions or trillions of parameters are trained on vast datasets, achieving unprecedented success across a series of language tasks. However, despite these successes, LLMs still rely on probabilistic modeling, which often captures spurious correlations rooted in linguistic patterns and social stereotypes, rather than the true causal relationships between entities and events. This limitation renders LLMs vulnerable to issues such as demographic biases, social stereotypes, and LLM hallucinations. These challenges highlight the urgent need to integrate causality into LLMs, moving beyond correlation-driven paradigms to build more reliable and ethically aligned AI systems. While many existing surveys and studies focus on utilizing prompt engineering to activate LLMs for causal knowledge or developing benchmarks to assess their causal reasoning abilities, most of these efforts rely on human intervention to activate pre-trained models. How to embed causality into the training process of LLMs and build more general and intelligent models remains unexplored. Recent research highlights that LLMs function as causal parrots, capable of reciting causal knowledge without truly understanding or applying it. These prompt-based methods are still limited to human interventional improvements. This survey aims to address this gap by exploring how causality can enhance LLMs at every stage of their lifecycle-from token embedding learning and foundation model training to fine-tuning, alignment, inference, and evaluation-paving the way for more interpretable, reliable, and causally-informed models. Additionally, we further outline six promising future directions to advance LLM development, enhance their causal reasoning capabilities, and address the current limitations these models face.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Causal-Audit: Explicit and Auditable Graph-based Reasoning via Target-Aware Causal Chain Construction

    cs.AI 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A four-stage LLM framework that constructs, audits, and aggregates explicit causal chains outperforms prompting baselines on three context-free causal QA benchmarks.

  2. Unveiling Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models: Reality or Mirage?

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs perform much worse on causal questions built from post-cutoff news articles, suggesting their apparent causal skill is mostly memorization, and a general-knowledge prompt method only partly closes the gap.

  3. CAT: Causal Attention Tuning For Injecting Fine-grained Causal Knowledge into Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A training method that injects token-level causal labels into attention improves out-of-distribution accuracy on a synthetic benchmark and slightly on math/reasoning tasks.

  4. On using AI for EEG-based BCI applications: problems, current challenges and future trends

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A perspective paper argues that EEG-BCI generalization failures stem from causally induced distribution shifts and that current EEG datasets are orders of magnitude too small to support large brain models.

  5. Beyond Correlation: Towards Causal Large Language Model Agents in Biomedicine

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A position paper arguing that biomedical AI should move from correlation-based LLMs toward agentic systems that perform intervention-based causal reasoning, and listing the challenges and opportunities.

Pith tools