B-AVIBench: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Large Vision-Language Model on Black-box Adversarial Visual-Instructions
read the original abstract
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have shown significant progress in responding well to visual-instructions from users. However, these instructions, encompassing images and text, are susceptible to both intentional and inadvertent attacks. Despite the critical importance of LVLMs' robustness against such threats, current research in this area remains limited. To bridge this gap, we introduce B-AVIBench, a framework designed to analyze the robustness of LVLMs when facing various Black-box Adversarial Visual-Instructions (B-AVIs), including four types of image-based B-AVIs, ten types of text-based B-AVIs, and nine types of content bias B-AVIs (such as gender, violence, cultural, and racial biases, among others). We generate 316K B-AVIs encompassing five categories of multimodal capabilities (ten tasks) and content bias. We then conduct a comprehensive evaluation involving 14 open-source LVLMs to assess their performance. B-AVIBench also serves as a convenient tool for practitioners to evaluate the robustness of LVLMs against B-AVIs. Our findings and extensive experimental results shed light on the vulnerabilities of LVLMs, and highlight that inherent biases exist even in advanced closed-source LVLMs like GeminiProVision and GPT-4V. This underscores the importance of enhancing the robustness, security, and fairness of LVLMs. The source code and benchmark are available at https://github.com/zhanghao5201/B-AVIBench.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
High-Entropy Tokens as Multimodal Failure Points in Vision-Language Models
High-entropy tokens act as concentrated multimodal failure points in VLMs, enabling sparse Entropy-Guided Attacks that achieve 93-95% success and 30-38% harmful rates with cross-model transfer.
-
VLBiasBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Bias in Large Vision-Language Model
VLBiasBench is a new large-scale benchmark with 128,342 samples covering nine social bias categories plus two intersectional ones to evaluate biases in LVLMs.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.