REVIEW 2 cited by
From RAG to QA-RAG: Integrating Generative AI for Pharmaceutical Regulatory Compliance Process
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Regulatory compliance in the pharmaceutical industry entails navigating through complex and voluminous guidelines, often requiring significant human resources. To address these challenges, our study introduces a chatbot model that utilizes generative AI and the Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) method. This chatbot is designed to search for guideline documents relevant to the user inquiries and provide answers based on the retrieved guidelines. Recognizing the inherent need for high reliability in this domain, we propose the Question and Answer Retrieval Augmented Generation (QA-RAG) model. In comparative experiments, the QA-RAG model demonstrated a significant improvement in accuracy, outperforming all other baselines including conventional RAG methods. This paper details QA-RAG's structure and performance evaluation, emphasizing its potential for the regulatory compliance domain in the pharmaceutical industry and beyond. We have made our work publicly available for further research and development.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
LLMs to Support a Domain Specific Knowledge Assistant
A synthetic QA dataset for IFRS sustainability reporting is created with LLMs and used to build and evaluate two QA pipelines, with the fully LLM-based pipeline scoring highest.
-
Bridging the Gap: Leveraging Retrieval-Augmented Generation to Better Understand Public Concerns about Vaccines
A RAG-based tool that answers complex queries about vaccine concerns from social media, evaluated on 35,103 Shingrix posts with automated faithfulness and relevance scores.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.