Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Diagnosing Infeasible Optimization Problems Using Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.12923 v1 pith:EQFMMBWG submitted 2023-08-23 cs.HC cs.CLcs.LGmath.OC

classification cs.HCcs.CLcs.LGmath.OC
keywords optimizationmodelsinfeasibleoptichatconstraintsexpertidentifydecision
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Decision-making problems can be represented as mathematical optimization models, finding wide applications in fields such as economics, engineering and manufacturing, transportation, and health care. Optimization models are mathematical abstractions of the problem of making the best decision while satisfying a set of requirements or constraints. One of the primary barriers to deploying these models in practice is the challenge of helping practitioners understand and interpret such models, particularly when they are infeasible, meaning no decision satisfies all the constraints. Existing methods for diagnosing infeasible optimization models often rely on expert systems, necessitating significant background knowledge in optimization. In this paper, we introduce OptiChat, a first-of-its-kind natural language-based system equipped with a chatbot GUI for engaging in interactive conversations about infeasible optimization models. OptiChat can provide natural language descriptions of the optimization model itself, identify potential sources of infeasibility, and offer suggestions to make the model feasible. The implementation of OptiChat is built on GPT-4, which interfaces with an optimization solver to identify the minimal subset of constraints that render the entire optimization problem infeasible, also known as the Irreducible Infeasible Subset (IIS). We utilize few-shot learning, expert chain-of-thought, key-retrieve, and sentiment prompts to enhance OptiChat's reliability. Our experiments demonstrate that OptiChat assists both expert and non-expert users in improving their understanding of the optimization models, enabling them to quickly identify the sources of infeasibility.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. InvEvolve: Evolving White-Box Inventory Policies via Large Language Models with Performance Guarantees

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    InvEvolve evolves white-box inventory policies from LLMs with statistical safety guarantees and outperforms classical and deep learning methods on synthetic and real retail data.

  2. InvEvolve: Evolving White-Box Inventory Policies via Large Language Models with Performance Guarantees

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    InvEvolve uses LLMs and RL to generate certified inventory policies that outperform classical and deep learning methods on synthetic and real data while providing multi-period performance guarantees.

  3. InvEvolve: Evolving White-Box Inventory Policies via Large Language Models with Performance Guarantees

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    InvEvolve evolves inventory policies using LLMs with RL and provides statistical safety guarantees, outperforming classical and DL methods on synthetic and real data.

  4. A Survey of Optimization Modeling Meets LLMs: Progress and Future Directions

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A survey of LLM-based optimization modeling, plus an audit revealing high error rates in existing benchmarks and a cleaned leaderboard.

Pith tools