Curriculum Labeling: Revisiting Pseudo-Labeling for Semi-Supervised Learning
read the original abstract
In this paper we revisit the idea of pseudo-labeling in the context of semi-supervised learning where a learning algorithm has access to a small set of labeled samples and a large set of unlabeled samples. Pseudo-labeling works by applying pseudo-labels to samples in the unlabeled set by using a model trained on the combination of the labeled samples and any previously pseudo-labeled samples, and iteratively repeating this process in a self-training cycle. Current methods seem to have abandoned this approach in favor of consistency regularization methods that train models under a combination of different styles of self-supervised losses on the unlabeled samples and standard supervised losses on the labeled samples. We empirically demonstrate that pseudo-labeling can in fact be competitive with the state-of-the-art, while being more resilient to out-of-distribution samples in the unlabeled set. We identify two key factors that allow pseudo-labeling to achieve such remarkable results (1) applying curriculum learning principles and (2) avoiding concept drift by restarting model parameters before each self-training cycle. We obtain 94.91% accuracy on CIFAR-10 using only 4,000 labeled samples, and 68.87% top-1 accuracy on Imagenet-ILSVRC using only 10% of the labeled samples. The code is available at https://github.com/uvavision/Curriculum-Labeling
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Retrieval-Augmented Personalization with Foundation Models for Wearable Stress Detection
Retrieval from out-of-domain foundation models enables personalization of a lightweight transformer for stress detection, yielding +3.92% accuracy and +4.76% F1 gains on WESAD without user labels.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.