The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2502.10920 · v1 · pith:FLR2CXXF · submitted 2025-02-15 · cs.CV · cs.AI

Do Deepfake Detectors Work in Reality?

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:FLR2CXXFrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CV cs.AI
keywords real-worlddeepfakedetectionmethodscriticaldeepfakesdetectorsfaceswap
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Deepfakes, particularly those involving faceswap-based manipulations, have sparked significant societal concern due to their increasing realism and potential for misuse. Despite rapid advancements in generative models, detection methods have not kept pace, creating a critical gap in defense strategies. This disparity is further amplified by the disconnect between academic research and real-world applications, which often prioritize different objectives and evaluation criteria. In this study, we take a pivotal step toward bridging this gap by presenting a novel observation: the post-processing step of super-resolution, commonly employed in real-world scenarios, substantially undermines the effectiveness of existing deepfake detection methods. To substantiate this claim, we introduce and publish the first real-world faceswap dataset, collected from popular online faceswap platforms. We then qualitatively evaluate the performance of state-of-the-art deepfake detectors on real-world deepfakes, revealing that their accuracy approaches the level of random guessing. Furthermore, we quantitatively demonstrate the significant performance degradation caused by common post-processing techniques. By addressing this overlooked challenge, our study underscores a critical avenue for enhancing the robustness and practical applicability of deepfake detection methods in real-world settings.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.