pith. sign in

arxiv: 2110.14216 · v2 · pith:G2YVXAWRnew · submitted 2021-10-27 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.DC· stat.ML

What Do We Mean by Generalization in Federated Learning?

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.DCstat.ML
keywords federateddatalearningdistributionsdrawngapsgeneralizationperformance
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Federated learning data is drawn from a distribution of distributions: clients are drawn from a meta-distribution, and their data are drawn from local data distributions. Thus generalization studies in federated learning should separate performance gaps from unseen client data (out-of-sample gap) from performance gaps from unseen client distributions (participation gap). In this work, we propose a framework for disentangling these performance gaps. Using this framework, we observe and explain differences in behavior across natural and synthetic federated datasets, indicating that dataset synthesis strategy can be important for realistic simulations of generalization in federated learning. We propose a semantic synthesis strategy that enables realistic simulation without naturally-partitioned data. Informed by our findings, we call out community suggestions for future federated learning works.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Prompt Estimation from Prototypes for Federated Prompt Tuning of Vision Transformers

    cs.CV 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PEP-FedPT achieves generalization and personalization in federated ViT prompt tuning via adaptive mixing of class-specific prompts weighted by global class prototypes and client priors, without per-client trainable pa...