Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 48 references

Combinatorics and large genus asymptotics of the Br\'ezin--Gross--Witten numbers

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that every normalized Brézin–Gross–Witten number lies within an absolute constant divided by the genus of the universal value 1/π, uniformly in the number and size of the arguments.

desk verdict A genuine improvement over the fixed-n asymptotics; the main theorem holds up, though Section 6 needs more detail. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.20388 v2 pith:GISKM2MZ submitted 2024-12-29 math-ph math.AGmath.COmath.MPnlin.SI

Jindong Guo , Paul Norbury , Di Yang , Don Zagier This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.AGmath.COmath.MPnlin.SI MSC 14H1032G1534M55
keywords Brézin–Gross–WittennumbersintersectionlargegenusasymptoticsmodulispaceofstablecurvesThetaclassPainlevéIIhierarchyDVVrecursionpolynomiality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the Brézin–Gross–Witten (BGW) numbers, rational intersection numbers on the moduli space of stable algebraic curves that first arose from a unitary matrix model. It proves a uniform large-genus limit: after a natural normalization, every BGW number $C(d)$ satisfies $|C(d)-1/\pi| \le K/g(d)$, where $g(d)$ is the genus and $K$ is an absolute constant independent of the number $n$ of marked points and of the sizes of the entries $d_j$. The paper also proves a polynomiality phenomenon: the full asymptotic expansion of $C(d)$ in inverse genus, after renormalizing by an explicit gamma-function factor, has coefficients that are universal polynomials in the multiplicities of the small entries of $d$. Consequences include the first determination of the leading constant $1/\pi$ for Painlevé II hierarchy coefficients and uniform $1/\pi$ asymptotics for BGW-kappa numbers. Extensive tables and several conjectures about monotonicity, integrality, and subexponential corrections accompany the proofs.

What carries the argument

The central object is the normalized BGW number $C(d)$, defined from the intersection number $\langle\tau_{d_1}\cdots\tau_{d_n}\rangle^\Theta_g$ by scaling with double factorials and a factorial of $X(d)=2g-2+n$. The argument is carried by the DVV-type recursion (46), which expresses $C(d)$ in terms of values with smaller $X(d)$ and quadratic products of lower-genus values. To control the maximum $\theta_{X,n}$ of $C(d)$ over tuples with fixed $X(d)$, the authors introduce an auxiliary sequence $f(X,n)$ satisfying a two-term recursion with a $4/((X-1)(X-2))$ source term and prove uniform estimates for $f$ using a residue bound on the coefficients $P(n,j)$ of the algebraic function $((3-\sqrt{9-8t^2})/(2t))^{n-2}$. The gamma factor $\gamma(X)=\Gamma(X/2+1)^2/(\pi\Gamma((X+1)/2)\Gamma((X+3)/2))$ serves as the renormalizing function whose large-$X$ expansion yields the universal constants in the polynomiality expansion.

What would settle it

Compute the full set of normalized BGW numbers for growing genus with $n$ proportional to $g$ (for example $n\approx g/2$) and test whether the maximum of $|C(d)-1/\pi|\cdot g(d)$ stays bounded by a single constant; if this maximum grows without bound, the uniform claim of Theorem 1 fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is Theorem 1: for every tuple $d=(d_1,\dots,d_n)$ of nonnegative integers, the normalized BGW number $C(d)$ satisfies $C(d)=1/\pi+O(1/g(d))$ uniformly as $g(d)=|d|+1$ tends to infinity, with an absolute constant in the error term. This is the first uniform large-genus asymptotics for all BGW numbers, valid even when the number of marked points grows with the genus. The paper further proves Theorem 2: after renormalizing by $\gamma(X(d))$, a ratio of gamma functions, the asymptotic expansion in $1/X(d)$ has coefficients $\hat c_k$ that are universal polynomials in the multiplicities of the arguments, with explicit degree bounds. A new proof of the polynomiality phenomenon is given, independent of previous work, and the paper derives applications to the Painlevé II hierarchy and to BGW-kappa numbers.

Load-bearing premise

The proof's upper bound relies on a technical estimate for coefficients $P(n,j)$ on a fixed circle of radius $1.05$, together with the monotonicity of the auxiliary sequence $f(X,n)$; if either failed, the uniform squeeze giving $C(d)\le 1/\pi+O(1/X)$ would collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every normalized BGW number lies within $K/g(d)$ of $1/\pi$, so the spread of all BGW numbers at a given large genus shrinks to zero at a uniform rate independent of the number of parts.
  • For each $d\ge1$, the coefficients $v_{d,n}$ of the formal solution to the $d$th member of the Painlevé II hierarchy satisfy $v_{d,n}\sim \frac{1}{\pi}\frac{((2d+1)n-1)!}{(2d+1)^{n-1}(n-1)!}$, extending a known $d=1$ result to all $d$.
  • The normalized BGW-kappa numbers $C(m;d)$ satisfy the same uniform bound $|C(m;d)-1/\pi|\le K(m)/g(m;d)$ for each fixed $m\ge0$.
  • The renormalized numbers $\hat C(d)$ have a computable universal asymptotic expansion in powers of $1/X(d)$, with coefficients that are explicit polynomials in the multiplicities of the small entries of $d$.
  • The paper gives an independent proof of the polynomiality phenomenon for BGW numbers, not relying on the earlier fixed-genus treatment.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension: the uniform bound suggests that a similar normalization might yield a uniform $1/g$ bound for Witten–Kontsevich intersection numbers even when $n$ grows with $g$, but the paper only voices this as a hope, so a separate proof would be needed.
  • Extension: the conjectural subexponential formula $1-\hat C(d)\sim\sum_j (2d_j+1)!!^3/(2^{d_j+1}(d_j+1)!)(X(d)-2d_j)^{-2d_j-2}$ can be tested numerically at moderate $d$ to see whether the error in the conjectured uniform version stays small, which would sharpen the $O(1/g)$ window of Theorem 1.
  • Extension: if the monotonicity conjectures hold, the extreme values of $C(d)$ over all partitions of $g-1$ are attained at very concrete partitions, giving a direct route to sharpen the uniform error from $O(1/g)$ to $O(1/g^2)$ between the crudest and finest partitions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Brézin–Gross–Witten numbers, normalized as C(d) in (6), and proves in Theorem 1 that C(d)=1/π+O(1/g(d)) uniformly over all d∈(Z≥0)^n as the genus g(d)=|d|+1 tends to infinity, with an absolute constant in the error. The proof in Section 5 uses the DVV recursion (88), a lower bound C(d)≥C(|d|) (Lemma 2), a combinatorial estimate on the quadratic terms (Lemma 3), an auxiliary function f(X,n) solving a recursion (99) with explicit closed form (102), and a Lemma 4 stating f(X,n)=1/π+O(1/X) for n≤X/5, whose proof relies on a contour estimate for the coefficients P(n,j). Theorem 2 gives a new proof of the polynomiality of the large-genus asymptotic coefficients, with degree estimates (29), and the paper applies these results to the Painlevé II hierarchy (Theorems 3, 4) and to BGW-kappa numbers (Proposition 1). The paper also contains many explicit formulas, tables, and conjectures (monotonicity, integrality, subexponential asymptotics).

Significance. If correct, Theorem 1 is a substantial and surprising result: every normalized BGW number, regardless of the number of parts or their sizes, approaches the same universal constant 1/π with a uniform O(1/g) error. This goes beyond earlier fixed-n asymptotics of Eynard et al. and yields an independent determination of the constant A=1/π in the Painlevé asymptotics, without invoking the deep Riemann–Hilbert result of Its–Kapaev. The proof is elementary and self-contained, building on the DVV recursion and techniques of Aggarwal, and it avoids the random-walk arguments used for Witten's intersection numbers. The paper also gives a new proof of polynomiality (Theorem 2), explicit rational-function formulas (Propositions 5, 6), and applications to Painlevé II and BGW-kappa numbers. The numerical data are extensive and reproducible, and the conjectures are crisply stated and well-motivated. These are strong credits for the paper.

minor comments (5)
  1. [§5, proof of Theorem 1] The definition of the integer t in the iteration for the region X/5 < n ≤ X/3 is ambiguous and potentially erroneous: the text states 'for any t ≤ [(5n−X+1)/4]' and then sets t to that value. If [·] denotes the floor, then for values such as 5n−X=5 the chosen t is one less than the minimal t needed to reach the range n−t ≤ (X−t)/5; after that iteration the pair is still outside the range where Lemma 4 applies. The proof works if t is taken to be the ceiling of (5n−X)/4, or if Lemma 4 is extended to n ≤ X/5+O(1) (which its proof supports). Please clarify the notation and adjust the bound.
  2. [§6, equation (123)] The step 'This contradicts (69) unless A=0' is very terse. The reasoning is that (69) gives an explicit formula for the two-point numbers from which one sees that the coefficient C_{k+1}(d) in the expansion (116) is constant for d ≥ (k+1)/2, whereas (123) for p=0 would force a linear dependence on d if A≠0. I recommend spelling out this argument in one or two sentences for the reader.
  3. [Abstract/Introduction] There is a typo 'independent proof of of this evaluation' in the introduction; also 'explitcit' in Corollary 4 should be 'explicitly'.
  4. [Equation (38)] In the definition of the normalized BGW-kappa numbers C(m; d), the factor appears as '3m 2^{2g−1}'; this must be 3^m 2^{2g−1}. Please correct the superscript.
  5. [Throughout] The notation [x] is used for an integer part without definition. In a number-theory paper [x] conventionally means floor, but here the intended meaning in the iteration of Section 5 is likely the ceiling (or nearest integer) to make the argument valid. A short definition or replacement by an explicit ceil/floor notation would avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the uniform 1/g asymptotics of Theorem 1 are derived from exact formulas and a verified majorant, not from a fitted or self-cited target constant.

full rationale

The central claim, Theorem 1, derives C(d)=1/pi+O(1/g(d)) from three independent ingredients: the lower bound C(d)>=C(|d|) of Lemma 2, the majorant theta_{X,n}<=f(X,n) of Lemma 5, and the estimate f(X,n)=1/pi+O(1/X) of Lemma 4. The constant 1/pi is not inserted as a fitted parameter: the lower bound uses the exact one-point formula (10), C(g-1)=g*4^{1-2g}*binomial(2g-1,g)^2, whose Stirling expansion already contains 1/pi. The auxiliary function f(X,n) in (99) is initialized at 1/pi on a small boundary strip, but this is not a circular insertion of the conclusion because Lemma 5 verifies the boundary cases directly: n=1 from (10), n=2 from (69)/(107), and X<=7 from Table 1. The homogeneous part of the recursion (99) preserves whatever boundary constant is chosen; the nontrivial content of Lemma 4 is the cancellation estimate that keeps f(X,n) within O(1/X) of 1/pi for n<=X/5, proved by the residue bound P(n,j)<=1.05^{-j}*1.23^{n-2}. This bound is independent of the theorem being proved. The applications in Sections 9 and 10 use Theorem 1 as an input to obtain Painleve and BGW-kappa asymptotics, not as an output of those sections. The paper does cite prior work by the present authors, including the DVV-type recursion (46) from [14], the one-point formula (10) from [17], and the Theta-class definition from [41], but these citations supply the standard computational framework for BGW numbers and are not a self-citation chain that forces the uniform asymptotics. No step of the proof reduces, by construction or by definition, to its own output, so no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No constants are fitted to data. The constant 1/π enters through the exact one-point formula C(g-1) and Stirling's expansion; the auxiliary function f(X,n) is initialized at 1/π from these exact values, not tuned to the target asymptotics. All conjectures are clearly labeled and not used as assumptions in the theorems. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The BGW partition function satisfies the Virasoro constraints (42) and the DVV-type recursion (46) with initial value B(0)=1/8.
    Used throughout Sections 5 and 6 to derive the normalized recursion (88); cited from [2,14,23,40] and [14], not reproved here.
  • domain assumption The explicit n-point generating series (50)-(53) and the closed one-point formula (10) hold.
    Used for exact n-point formulas (Props 2,3), the two-point formula (68)-(69), and the base values C(g-1), C(1^{g-1}); cited from [17,5,15].
  • domain assumption The integral representation (3) and the ELSV-like formula (4) identify BGW numbers with intersection numbers.
    Provides the geometric meaning and the degree-dimension condition (2); cited from [41,7,47].
  • standard math The contour-residue estimate in Lemma 4 is correct as stated.
    The bound P(n,j) ≤ 1.05^{-j} 1.23^{n-2} is the load-bearing analytic step behind the uniform upper bound; it is verified by a residue integral on |t|=1.05.
  • domain assumption The Painlevé transformations (185)-(186) map the Painlevé XXXIV hierarchy to the Painlevé II hierarchy for α_d=1/2.
    Theorem 3's proof relies on this known transformation from [9,20].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Combinatorics and large genus asymptotics of the Br\'ezin--Gross--Witten numbers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GISKM2MZ

@misc{pith2026241220388,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Combinatorics and large genus asymptotics of the Br\'ezin--Gross--Witten numbers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GISKM2MZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.20388}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we study combinatorial and asymptotic properties of some interesting rational numbers called the Br\'ezin--Gross--Witten (BGW) numbers, which can be represented as the intersection numbers of psi and Theta classes on the moduli space of stable algebraic curves. In particular, we discover and prove the uniform large genus leading asymptotics of certain normalized BGW numbers, and give a new proof of the polynomiality phenomenon for the large genus asymptotics. We also propose, with extensive numerical data, several new conjectures including monotonicity and integrality on the BGW numbers. Applications to the Painlev\'e II hierarchy and to the BGW-kappa numbers are given.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Aggarwal, Large genus asymptotics for intersection numbers and principal strata volumes of quadratic differentials

    A. Aggarwal, Large genus asymptotics for intersection numbers and principal strata volumes of quadratic differentials. Invent. Math., 226 (2021), 897–1010

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Alexandrov, Cut-and-join description of generalized Brezin-Gross-Witten model

    A. Alexandrov, Cut-and-join description of generalized Brezin-Gross-Witten model. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 22 (2018), 1347–1399

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Ambjørn, L

    J. Ambjørn, L. Chekhov, The NBI matrix model of IIB superstrings. J. High Energy Phys., 12 (1998), 7–13

    work page 1998

  4. [4]

    Bertola, B

    M. Bertola, B. Dubrovin, D. Yang, Correlation functions of the KdV hierarchy and applications to intersection numbers over Mg,n. Phys. D, 327 (2016), 30–57

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Bertola, G

    M. Bertola, G. Ruzza, Brezin-Gross-Witten tau function and isomonodromic deformations. Com- mun. Number Theory Phys., 13 (2019), 827–883

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Br´ ezin, D.J

    E. Br´ ezin, D.J. Gross, The external field problem in the large N limit of QCD. Phys. Lett. B, 97 (1980), 120–124

    work page 1980

  7. [7]

    N. K. Chidambaram, E. Garcia-Failde, A. Giacchetto, Relations on Mg,n and the negative r-spin Witten conjecture. arXiv:2205.15621

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    D. Chen, M. M¨ oller, D. Zagier, Quasimodularity and large genus limits of Siegel-Veech constants. J. Amer. Math. Soc., 31 (2018), 1059–1163

    work page 2018

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    P. A. Clarkson, N. Joshi, A. Pickering, B¨ acklund transformations for the second Painlev´ e hierarchy: a modified truncation approach. Inverse Problems, 15 (1999), 175–187

    1999

  2. [10]

    Delecroix, ´E

    V. Delecroix, ´E. Goujard, P. Zograf, A. Zorich, Uniform lower bound for intersection numbers of psi-classes. Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl., 16 (2020), 86–98

    2020

  3. [11]

    Delecroix, ´E

    V. Delecroix, ´E. Goujard, P. Zograf, A. Zorich, Large genus asymptotic geometry of random square- tiled surfaces and of random multicurves. Invent. Math., 230 (2022), 123–224

    2022

  4. [12]

    L. A. Dickey, Soliton Equations and Hamiltonian Systems , 2nd. World Scientific Publishing, 2003

    2003

  5. [13]

    Dijkgraaf, E

    R. Dijkgraaf, E. Verlinde, H. Verlinde, Loop equations and Virasoro constraints in non-perturbative 2-D quantum gravity. Nucl. Phys. B, 348 (1991), 435–456

    1991

  6. [14]

    N. Do, P. Norbury, Topological recursion on the Bessel curve. Commun. Number Theory Phys. 12 (2018), 53–73

    2018

  7. [15]

    Dubrovin, D.Yang, Generating series for GUE correlators

    B. Dubrovin, D.Yang, Generating series for GUE correlators. Lett. Math. Phys., 107 (2017), 1971– 2012

    2017

  8. [16]

    Dubrovin, D.Yang, On Gromov-Witten invariants of P1

    B. Dubrovin, D.Yang, On Gromov-Witten invariants of P1. Math. Res. Lett., 26 (2019), 729–748

    2019

  9. [17]

    Dubrovin, D

    B. Dubrovin, D. Yang, D. Zagier, On tau-functions for the KdV hierarchy. Selecta Math.,27 (2021), paper No. 12, 47 pp

    2021

  10. [18]

    Eynard, E

    B. Eynard, E. Garcia-Failde, A. Giacchetto, P. Gregori, D. Lewa´ nski, Resurgent large genus asymp- totics of intersection numbers. arXiv:2309.03143

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    Eynard, N

    B. Eynard, N. Orantin, Invariants of algebraic curves and topological expansion, Commun. Number Theory Phys. 1 (2007), 347–452

    2007

  12. [20]

    A. S. Fokas, M. J. Ablowitz, On a unified approach to transformations and elementary solutions of Painlev´ e equations. J. Math. Phys.23 (1982), 2033–2042

    1982

  13. [21]

    A. S. Fokas, A. R. Its, A. A. Kapaev, V. Yu. Novokshenov, Painlev´ e Transcendents: The Riemann- Hilbert Approach. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 128 (2006)

    2006

  14. [22]

    Griguolo, J

    L. Griguolo, J. Papalini, L. Russo, D. Seminara, Asymptotics of Weil-Petersson volumes and two- dimensional quantum gravities. SciPost Phys., 17 (2024), 156

    2024

  15. [23]

    D. J. Gross, M. J. Newman, Unitary and hermitian matrices in an external field. II. The Kontsevich model and continuum Virasoro constraints. Nuclear Phys. B, 380 (1992), 168–180

    1992

  16. [24]

    D. J. Gross, E. Witten, Possible Third Order Phase Transition in the Large N Lattice Gauge Theory. Phys. Rev. D, 21 (1980), 446–453

    1980

  17. [25]

    Guo, A remark on equivalence between two formulas of the two-point Witten-Kontsevich corre- lators

    J. Guo, A remark on equivalence between two formulas of the two-point Witten-Kontsevich corre- lators. Chin. Q. J. Math., 39 (2024), 82–85

    2024

  18. [26]

    J. Guo, D. Yang, On the large genus asymptotics of psi-class intersection numbers. Math. Ann.,388 (2024), 61–97

    2024

  19. [27]

    Huang, Large genus asymptotics of super Weil-Petersson volumes

    X. Huang, Large genus asymptotics of super Weil-Petersson volumes. arXiv:2501.07848

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    Huang, K

    X. Huang, K. Liu, H. Xu, Higher Weil-Petersson volumes of the moduli space of super Riemann surfaces. arXiv:2501.05806. COMBINATORICS AND ASYMPTOTICS OF BGW NUMBERS 41

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    E. L. Ince, Ordinary Differential Equations , reprint of the 1926 edition (Lonmans, Green & Co., London), Dover Publications, NY, 1956

    1926

  22. [30]

    A. R. Its, A. A. Kapaev, Quasi-linear Stokes phenomenon for the second Painlev´ e transcendent, Nonlinearity, 16 (2003), 363–386

    2003

  23. [31]

    Itzykson, J

    C. Itzykson, J. B. Zuber, Combinatorics of the modular group. II. The Kontsevich integrals. Inter- nat. J. Modern Phys. A, 7 (1992), 5661–5705

    1992

  24. [32]

    Kaufmann, Y

    R. Kaufmann, Y. Manin, D. Zagier, Higher Weil-Petersson volumes of moduli spaces of stable n-pointed curves. Comm. Math. Phys., 181 (1996), 763–787

    1996

  25. [33]

    Kazarian, P

    M. Kazarian, P. Norbury, Polynomial relations among kappa classes on the moduli space of curves. IMRN, 2024 (2024), 1825–1867

    2024

  26. [34]

    Kontsevich, Intersection theory on the moduli space of curves and the matrix Airy function

    M. Kontsevich, Intersection theory on the moduli space of curves and the matrix Airy function. Comm. Math. Phys., 147 (1992), 1–23

    1992

  27. [35]

    K. Liu, H. Xu, Intersection numbers and automorphisms of stable curves. Michigan Math. J., 58 (2009), 385–400

    2009

  28. [36]

    K. Liu, H. Xu, Recursion formulae of higher Weil-Petersson volumes. IMRN, 2009 (2009), 835–859

    2009

  29. [37]

    K. Liu, H. Xu, A remark on Mirzakhani’s asymptotic formulae. Asian J. Math., 18 (2014), 29–52

    2014

  30. [38]

    Magri, A simple model of the integrable Hamiltonian equation

    F. Magri, A simple model of the integrable Hamiltonian equation. J. Math. Phys., 19 (1978), 1156–1162

    1978

  31. [39]

    Manin, P

    Y. Manin, P. Zograf, Invertible cohomological field theories and Weil-Petersson volumes. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), 50 (2000), 519–535

    2000

  32. [40]

    Mironov, A

    A. Mironov, A. Morozov, G. W. Semenoff, Unitary matrix integrals in the framework of generalized Kontsevich model. 1. Brezin-Gross-Witten model. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 11 (1996), 5031–5080

    1996

  33. [41]

    Norbury, A new cohomology class on the moduli space of curves

    P. Norbury, A new cohomology class on the moduli space of curves. Geom. Topol., 27 (2023), 2695–2761

    2023

  34. [42]

    Norbury, Enumerative geometry via the moduli space of super Riemann surface

    P. Norbury, Enumerative geometry via the moduli space of super Riemann surface. arXiv:2005.04378

    2005

  35. [43]

    Okuyama, K

    K. Okuyama, K. Sakai, JT supergravity and Brezin-Gross-Witten tau-function, J. High Energy Phys., 2020 (2020), 160

    2020

  36. [44]

    Stanford, E

    D. Stanford, E. Witten, JT gravity and the ensembles of random matrix theory. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 24 (2020), 1475–1680

    2020

  37. [45]

    Witten, Two-dimensional gravity and intersection theory on moduli space

    E. Witten, Two-dimensional gravity and intersection theory on moduli space. Surveys Diff. Geom.,1 (1991), 243–310

    1991

  38. [46]

    J. Xu, D. Yang, Galilean symmetry of the KdV hierarchy. arXiv:2403.04631

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    D. Yang, Q. Zhang, On the Hodge-BGW correspondence. Commun. Number Theory Phys., 18 (2024), 611–651

    2024

  40. [48]

    P. G. Zograf, An explicit formula for Witten’s 2-correlators. J. Math. Sci., 240 (2019), 535–538. Jindong Guo, School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026 Hefei, P.R. China Email address : guojindong@mail.ustc.edu.cn Paul Norbury, Sch...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.