pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.10738 · v1 · pith:GTRMRQCBnew · submitted 2026-06-09 · 📡 eess.AS · cs.AI

Spatial-Omni: Spatial Audio Understanding Integration in Multimodal LLMs via FOA Encoding

Zhiyuan Zhu , Yixuan Chen , Yiwen Shao , Wenxiang Guo , Changhao Pan , Yu Zhang , Yuxiang Wang , Wei Liu
show 8 more authors
Houhua Zhang Chengkuan Zeng Wenbo Cheng Yunxi Liu Rui Yang Steve Yves Liefeng Bo Zhou Zhao
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 11:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.AS cs.AI
keywords spatial audioFirst-Order Ambisonicsmultimodal LLMssound localizationspatial reasoningaudio-language modelsstaged trainingFOA encoding
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spatial-Omni adds an independent SO-Encoder for First-Order Ambisonics signals to existing Omni LLMs so they gain spatial audio understanding without changing the original audio encoder.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that an extra encoder can convert First-Order Ambisonics spatial audio into tokens that plug into multimodal LLMs, trained in stages on new datasets of 400K clips and 2.1M question-answer pairs. This lets the models handle sound localization, spatial relations, and scene reasoning across 16 subtasks while keeping their existing general audio performance. If the approach works, current models that treat audio as single-channel can gain spatial capabilities through modular addition rather than full retraining. The experiments compare against other open-source audio-language models and report gains on spatial tasks.

Core claim

Spatial-Omni implements an SO-Encoder that processes First-Order Ambisonics signals as a separate modality and supplies spatial tokens to Omni LLMs. Staged training on the constructed SO-Dataset, SO-QA, and SO-Bench enables the model to outperform existing Large Audio-Language Models and Omni LLM models on spatial audio understanding while retaining reasonable general audio understanding.

What carries the argument

The SO-Encoder, an independent module that encodes First-Order Ambisonics spatial audio into tokens with limited added context cost.

If this is right

  • Existing Omni LLMs can process spatial audio for localization and relation reasoning without any change to their original audio encoder.
  • Staged training keeps general audio capabilities intact while adding the new spatial tokens.
  • A single lightweight encoder supports 16 subtasks from basic detection to complex spatial reasoning.
  • The method scales from open-source data, real recordings, and simulations totaling 400K clips and 2.1M QA pairs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same modular encoder pattern could be tested with higher-order ambisonics or binaural formats.
  • Spatial token addition might improve downstream tasks such as robotic navigation that rely on sound direction.
  • If the encoder stays small, similar independent modules could add other missing modalities like depth or thermal data.

Load-bearing premise

The staged training and separate SO-Encoder can add usable spatial tokens without lowering the base model's performance on ordinary non-spatial audio.

What would settle it

A measurable drop in accuracy on standard non-spatial audio benchmarks after the SO-Encoder and staged training are added, compared with the unmodified base model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.10738 by Changhao Pan, Chengkuan Zeng, Houhua Zhang, Liefeng Bo, Rui Yang, Steve Yves, Wei Liu, Wenbo Cheng, Wenxiang Guo, Yiwen Shao, Yixuan Chen, Yunxi Liu, Yuxiang Wang, Yu Zhang, Zhiyuan Zhu, Zhou Zhao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The overall architecture of the proposed Spatial-Omni. Details of SO-Encoder are shown in the left box. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) The sub-tasks of our SO-Bench, (b) The data sources in our SO-Dataset, (c) The data collection [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Distribution of sound events in the dataset. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Example of annotation JSON file. Tasks QA Pair Detect Source Q: "Listen to the audio clip and answer based only on what you hear. Which sound source is located to the back-right and below?", A: "The sound source located to the back-right and below is breathing." Estimate Azimuth Q: "Listen to the audio clip and answer based only on what you hear. Use the DCASE FOA coordinate system: +x front, +y left, +z u… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent multimodal large language models mainly process audio as monaural signals, thereby discarding the spatial cues contained in spatial audio for sound localization, spatial relation reasoning, and spatial scene understanding. We propose Spatial-Omni, a lightweight method that implements SO-Encoder to inject First-Order Ambisonics (FOA) spatial audio into existing Omni LLMs as an independent modality, without modifying their original audio encoders. SO-Encoder provides spatial tokens with limited additional context cost and improves spatial audio understanding through efficient staged training. To support training and evaluation, we construct SO-Dataset, SO-QA, and SO-Bench from open-source data, real recordings, and simulations, containing 400K FOA spatial audio clips and 2.1M spatial question answering pairs. SO-Bench covers 16 spatial audio understanding subtasks, including basic detection and location estimation, spatial relation understanding, and complex spatial reasoning. Experiments show that Spatial-Omni outperforms existing open-source Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) and Omni LLM models on spatial audio understanding tasks while retaining a reasonable level of general audio understanding. Code and data are available at https://github.com/dieKarotte/Spatial-Omni.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces Spatial-Omni, a lightweight integration method that adds an independent SO-Encoder to inject First-Order Ambisonics (FOA) spatial tokens into existing Omni LLMs without altering their original audio encoders. It constructs SO-Dataset (400K FOA clips), SO-QA, and SO-Bench (2.1M QA pairs across 16 subtasks covering detection, localization, spatial relations, and complex reasoning) from mixed open-source, real, and simulated sources. Staged training is used to add spatial capability while claiming retention of general audio performance; experiments are asserted to show outperformance over open-source LALMs and Omni models on spatial tasks.

Significance. If the empirical results are robust, the work would meaningfully address the monaural limitation of current multimodal LLMs by enabling spatial audio reasoning at modest context cost. The construction and public release of SO-Dataset/SO-Bench plus code availability support reproducibility and further research on spatial audio benchmarks.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'Spatial-Omni outperforms existing open-source Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) and Omni LLM models on spatial audio understanding tasks' is presented without any quantitative metrics, baseline names, absolute or relative scores, statistical tests, or error analysis; this absence is load-bearing for the empirical contribution.
  2. [Method and Experiments] §3 (method) and §4 (experiments): the assertion that the independent SO-Encoder and staged training 'retain a reasonable level of general audio understanding' requires explicit before/after metrics on non-spatial benchmarks together with ablation results on token fusion and context overhead; without these the no-degradation claim cannot be evaluated.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Dataset Construction] Provide a table listing the 16 subtasks in SO-Bench with sample counts and source breakdown (open-source vs. real vs. simulated).
  2. [SO-Encoder] Clarify the exact projection dimensions, token count, and fusion mechanism of the SO-Encoder in a dedicated subsection or figure.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. We address the major comments below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the empirical presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'Spatial-Omni outperforms existing open-source Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) and Omni LLM models on spatial audio understanding tasks' is presented without any quantitative metrics, baseline names, absolute or relative scores, statistical tests, or error analysis; this absence is load-bearing for the empirical contribution.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by including quantitative support for the outperformance claim. In the revised version we will add specific metrics (e.g., average accuracy gains on SO-Bench subtasks), name the main baselines, and report absolute/relative scores. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Method and Experiments] §3 (method) and §4 (experiments): the assertion that the independent SO-Encoder and staged training 'retain a reasonable level of general audio understanding' requires explicit before/after metrics on non-spatial benchmarks together with ablation results on token fusion and context overhead; without these the no-degradation claim cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: We acknowledge that explicit before/after numbers on standard non-spatial audio benchmarks, plus ablations on fusion and context cost, are needed to substantiate the retention claim. We will add these results and ablations to §4 in the revision. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper describes an empirical engineering contribution: an independent SO-Encoder added to existing Omni LLMs via staged training, plus newly constructed SO-Dataset/SO-Bench. No equations, fitted parameters, or derivations are presented that could reduce to inputs by construction. The central claim rests on experimental outcomes (outperformance on spatial tasks while retaining general audio capability), which are externally falsifiable via the released code and data rather than self-referential. No self-citation load-bearing steps, uniqueness theorems, or ansatz smuggling appear in the provided text. This is a standard non-circular empirical ML paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the empirical effectiveness of a new encoder and newly assembled datasets rather than on any mathematical derivation; the main untested premises are compatibility of the added modality and representativeness of the synthetic-plus-real data mixture.

free parameters (2)
  • SO-Encoder token count and projection dimensions
    Chosen to keep additional context cost low while preserving spatial information; values are not reported in the abstract.
  • Staged training schedule and learning rates
    Hyperparameters selected to achieve efficient spatial learning without harming general audio performance.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Existing Omni LLMs can accept additional independent token streams from a new encoder without retraining or architectural changes to the original audio pathway.
    The method description states that the SO-Encoder is added 'without modifying their original audio encoders.'
invented entities (1)
  • SO-Encoder no independent evidence
    purpose: Converts FOA signals into spatial tokens usable by the LLM.
    New component introduced by the paper; no independent evidence outside the reported experiments is supplied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5803 in / 1264 out tokens · 30224 ms · 2026-06-27T11:51:15.206649+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

18 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Yunfei Chu, Jin Xu, Qian Yang, Haojie Wei, Xipin Wei, Zhifang Guo, Yichong Leng, Yuanjun Lv, Jinzheng He, Junyang Lin, and 1 others

    Savvy: Spatial awareness via audio-visual llms through seeing and hearing.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 38:118999–119038. Yunfei Chu, Jin Xu, Qian Yang, Haojie Wei, Xipin Wei, Zhifang Guo, Yichong Leng, Yuanjun Lv, Jinzheng He, Junyang Lin, and 1 others. 2024. Qwen2-audio technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.10759. Gheorghe Coma...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    InProceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 6288–6313

    Gama: A large audio-language model with ad- vanced audio understanding and complex reasoning abilities. InProceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 6288–6313. Yuan Gong, Yu-An Chung, and James Glass. 2021. Ast: Audio spectrogram transformer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.01778. Eric Guizzo, Christian Marinoni...

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    InICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 1–2

    Overview of the l3das23 challenge on audio- visual extended reality. InICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 1–2. IEEE. Ayushi Mishra, Yang Bai, Priyadarshan Narayanasamy, Nakul Garg, and Nirupam Roy. 2025. Spatial audio processing with large language model on wearable devices.arXiv prepr...

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    OpenReview preprint, submitted to NeurIPS 2025

    Hear you are: Teaching llms spatial reasoning with vision and spatial sound. OpenReview preprint, submitted to NeurIPS 2025. S Sakshi, Vaibhavi Lokegaonkar, Neil Zhang, Ramani Duraiswami, Sreyan Ghosh, Dinesh Manocha, and Lie Lu. 2025a. Spur: A plug-and-play framework for integrating spatial audio understanding and reasoning into large audio-language mode...

    arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Julian Straub, Thomas Whelan, Lingni Ma, Yufan Chen, Erik Wijmans, Simon Green, Jakob J Engel, Raul Mur-Artal, Carl Ren, Shobhit Verma, and 1 others

    Spatial audio question answering and reason- ing on dynamic source movements.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.16334. Julian Straub, Thomas Whelan, Lingni Ma, Yufan Chen, Erik Wijmans, Simon Green, Jakob J Engel, Raul Mur-Artal, Carl Ren, Shobhit Verma, and 1 others

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    Parthasaarathy Sudarsanam and Archontis Politis

    The replica dataset: A digital replica of indoor spaces.arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.05797. Parthasaarathy Sudarsanam and Archontis Politis. 2025. Towards spatial audio understanding via question answering.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.09195. Peiwen Sun, Sitong Cheng, Xiangtai Li, Zhen Ye, Huadai Liu, Honggang Zhang, Wei Xue, and Yike Guo. 2024. Both ears wide o...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906

  7. [7]

    Changli Tang, Wenyi Yu, Guangzhi Sun, Xianzhao Chen, Tian Tan, Wei Li, Jun Zhang, Lu Lu, Zejun Ma, Yuxuan Wang, and 1 others

    Spatial blind spot: Auditory motion per- ception deficits in audio llms.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.13273. Changli Tang, Wenyi Yu, Guangzhi Sun, Xianzhao Chen, Tian Tan, Wei Li, Jun Zhang, Lu Lu, Zejun Ma, Yuxuan Wang, and 1 others. 2024a. Can large language models understand spatial audio?arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.07914. Changli Tang, Wenyi Yu, Guangzhi Su...

    arXiv 2026

  8. [8]

    Listen to the audio clip and answer based only on what you hear. Which sound source is located to the back-right and below?

    The world is not mono: Enabling spatial un- derstanding in large audio-language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.02954. 12 Hogeon Yu. 2024. Doa and event guidance system for sound event localization and detection with source distance estimation. Technical report, DCASE2024 Challenge. Weihao Yu, Zhengyuan Yang, Linjie Li, Jianfeng Wang, Kevin Lin, Zicheng ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    The question must be answerable from the provided metadata

  10. [10]

    The question should focus on spatial audio understanding, such as source detection, direction estimation, distance estimation, motion analysis, spatial relation reasoning, or speech content under spatial conditions

  11. [11]

    Do not mention metadata fields explicitly in the question

  12. [12]

    The answer should be concise and factual

  13. [13]

    Metadata: {metadata} Please generate {num_questions} question-answer pairs in JSON format

    If multiple sound sources are present, ensure that the question clearly specifies the target source, time interval, or spatial condition. Metadata: {metadata} Please generate {num_questions} question-answer pairs in JSON format. Prompt used for QA paraphrasing You are given a spatial audio question-answer pair. Your task is to rewrite the question into a ...

  14. [14]

    Do not change the answer

  15. [15]

    Do not introduce new spatial information

  16. [16]

    Keep the rewritten question answerable from the same audio clip

  17. [17]

    Avoid overly formal or repetitive wording

  18. [18]

    Original question: {question} Answer: {answer} Return only the rewritten question

    Preserve the target source, time interval, and spatial relation if they are mentioned in the original question. Original question: {question} Answer: {answer} Return only the rewritten question. H Licenses and A vailability We respect the original licenses of all referenced ar- tifacts and do not redistribute them. This work uses publicly available datase...