Pith. sign in

REVIEW 10 cited by

Large Language Models Are Reasoning Teachers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.10071 v2 pith:GXPPOUBJ submitted 2022-12-20 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords modelsreasoninglargecomplexmethodmodeltasksteacher
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent works have shown that chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting can elicit language models to solve complex reasoning tasks, step-by-step. However, prompt-based CoT methods are dependent on very large models such as GPT-3 175B which are prohibitive to deploy at scale. In this paper, we use these large models as reasoning teachers to enable complex reasoning in smaller models and reduce model size requirements by several orders of magnitude. We propose Fine-tune-CoT, a method that generates reasoning samples from very large teacher models to fine-tune smaller models. We evaluate our method on a wide range of public models and complex tasks. We find that Fine-tune-CoT enables substantial reasoning capability in small models, far outperforming prompt-based baselines and even the teacher model in many tasks. Additionally, we extend our method by leveraging the teacher model's ability to generate multiple distinct rationales for each original sample. Enriching the fine-tuning data with such diverse reasoning results in a substantial performance boost across datasets, even for very small models. We conduct ablations and sample studies to understand the emergence of reasoning capabilities of student models. Our code implementation and data are available at https://github.com/itsnamgyu/reasoning-teacher.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LeAct: Learning to Reason from Expert Actions

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An AI can learn to reason by sampling explanations for an expert's actions and keeping only the ones that help it predict those actions.

  2. Make me an Expert: Distilling from Generalist Black-Box Models into Specialized Models for Semantic Segmentation

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ATGC selects the best input scale for a black-box open-vocabulary segmentation API, using DINOv2 attention entropy, improving one-hot-label distillation on Cityscapes and ACDC.

  3. Learning to Insert [PAUSE] Tokens for Better Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A likelihood-based [PAUSE] token insertion method for fine-tuning shows small gains on GSM8K and MBPP, but the AQUA-RAT result is unreliable because the test set contains training samples.

  4. Fostering Video Reasoning via Next-Event Prediction

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Next-event prediction, training video language models to caption unseen future frames, improves their scores on several temporal benchmarks while roughly preserving general video understanding.

  5. Concise Reasoning, Big Gains: Pruning Long Reasoning Trace with Difficulty-Aware Prompting

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning small models on difficulty-adapted, shortened reasoning traces (LiteCoT) yields equal or better benchmark accuracy than training on much longer traces, with far fewer tokens.

  6. SafeMVDrive: Multi-view Safety-Critical Driving Video Synthesis in the Real World Domain

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SafeMVDrive generates multi-view, real-world safety-critical driving videos by selecting adversarial vehicles with a GRPO-finetuned vision-language model and simulating collision-evasion trajectories.

  7. Learning to Reason via Mixture-of-Thought for Logical Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Jointly training and voting across natural language, code, and truth-table reasoning modalities improves LLM logical reasoning accuracy by up to 11.7 percentage points.

  8. AgentDistill: Training-Free Agent Distillation with Generalizable MCP Boxes

    cs.AI 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    AgentDistill distills agent capabilities without any training by having a teacher generate reusable MCP tool boxes that small-model students invoke at inference time.

  9. Detecting Voice Phishing with Precision: Fine-Tuning Small Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning Llama-3-8B with human-authored voice phishing criteria outperforms chain-of-thought prompting and approaches GPT-4-level accuracy on a new adversarial Korean voice phishing benchmark.

  10. Large Language models for Time Series Analysis: Techniques, Applications, and Challenges

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A review of LLM-based time series analysis that proposes several taxonomies, but is undermined by citation errors and a lack of systematic methodology.

Pith tools