pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.23436 · v1 · pith:GY3GKUSDnew · submitted 2026-06-22 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI· cs.LG

Rethinking Object-Centric Representations for Video Dynamics Modeling

Amaury Wei , Ismail Nejjar , Olga Fink This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 09:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG
keywords object-centric video representationsslot-based modelsunsupervised object trackingappearance-pose disentanglementtemporal consistencyadaptive slot gatingvideo segmentation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Disentangling appearance from geometric pose in each video slot allows temporal consistency to be enforced only on appearance, preventing identity swaps under motion.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that standard slot-based video models entangle appearance and pose, so their temporal consistency objective forces slots to lock onto static background while foreground objects fragment or swap. By splitting each slot into separate appearance and pose components, the method can keep spatial separation within frames and align only appearance features across time. This produces sharper object masks and more stable identities even when objects move, occlude each other, or enter and exit the scene. An adaptive gating step further prevents over-segmentation by changing the number of active slots to match scene complexity. The resulting model is evaluated on both synthetic and real video benchmarks and reported to outperform prior slot approaches in segmentation quality and tracking persistence.

Core claim

STAITUS explicitly factors each slot into an appearance latent and a separate geometric pose (position and scale) latent. Temporal alignment is applied exclusively to the appearance latents while within-frame spatial separation is enforced on the full slots; an adaptive gating mechanism dynamically selects the number of active slots according to scene complexity. The paper states that these changes remove the conflict between consistency and motion, yielding sharper masks and more persistent object identities under motion, occlusion, and object entry or exit.

What carries the argument

Per-slot disentanglement into separate appearance and geometric pose (position/scale) latents, with temporal alignment restricted to appearance space and within-frame spatial separation applied to the full slots.

If this is right

  • Slots stop locking onto static background regions to satisfy temporal consistency.
  • Foreground objects maintain single persistent identities across frames with motion and occlusion.
  • The number of active slots automatically matches scene complexity, reducing over-segmentation.
  • Segmentation quality and tracking stability improve on both synthetic and real-world video benchmarks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same separation could be tested on tasks that require predicting future frames rather than only segmenting observed ones.
  • If the disentanglement holds, the method might extend to multi-camera or 3-D scene videos without retraining the alignment logic.
  • A natural next measurement would be whether the learned appearance latents transfer to downstream tasks such as object classification from tracked masks.

Load-bearing premise

Explicit separation of appearance and geometric pose into independent latent components is possible inside the slot architecture and sufficient to eliminate the consistency-motion conflict without losing information or creating new failure modes.

What would settle it

A controlled video sequence in which object appearance changes independently of pose but the model still produces identity swaps or fragmented masks despite the disentanglement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.23436 by Amaury Wei, Ismail Nejjar, Olga Fink.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: STAITUS: Our method disentangles object appearance from spatial pose and enforces temporal alignment, enabling state-of-the-art unsupervised object tracking. Abstract. Unsupervised video object tracking aims to decompose dy￾namic scenes into persistent, object-centric entities without manual an￾notations. Many recent approaches rely on slot-based representations, where a fixed set of latent variables (“slo… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of STAITUS. Given a frame xt, an encoder extracts dense features ht, which are grouped by a recurrent module into disentangled slot representations consisting of position (pt), scale (st), and visual appearance (vt) components. A learned gating mechanism Ggate determines slot activation zt dynamically adapting the number of active slots over time. Each active slot is decoded into an image xˆ k t a… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Illustration of the training objectives. a) Temporal alignment loss Ltime en￾courages consistent slot appearance across consecutive frames. b) Spatial separation loss Lsep encourages distinct slot appearances v k t in embedding space. c) Reconstruc￾tion loss Lrecon drives scene decomposition by minimizing the error between the input frame xt and its composited reconstruction xˆt. Temporal Alignment Loss. F… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Unsupervised scene decomposition on CLEVRER. We compare the segmenta￾tion masks generated by DINOSAUR, SlotContrast, and STAITUS on a sample frame. STAITUS produces significantly sharper and more precise masks, successfully isolating individual objects with minimal background leakage. VideoSAUR Over segmentation Identity swap t=0 t=4 t=8 t=12 t=16 t=20 t=23 SlotContrast Identity swap Object grouping STAITU… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Qualitative comparison of unsupervised object tracking in MOVi-C. The base￾lines exhibit identity swaps, over-segmentation (splitting single objects), and object grouping (merging distinct objects). In contrast, STAITUS maintains robust object identities and sharp segmentation boundaries across the entire sequence. These visual results highlight that STAITUS not only improves quantitative metrics but also … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative slot decomposition on MOVi-E and YouTubeVIS. While STAI￾TUS accurately segments foreground objects, it occasionally decomposes complex back￾grounds into distinct semantic regions (e.g., separating forest from snow). The qualitative behavior of STAITUS further reveals interesting structural properties. On photo-realistic and real-world data, STAITUS occasionally splits visually distinct backgrou… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Unsupervised video object tracking aims to decompose dynamic scenes into persistent, object-centric entities without manual annotations. Many recent approaches rely on slot-based representations, where a fixed set of latent variables ("slots") represent individual objects across frames. To preserve object identity, these models enforce temporal consistency on slot embeddings. However, when appearance and pose are entangled, this consistency objective conflicts with object motion and viewpoint changes. As a result, slots tend to lock onto static regions (e.g., background) to satisfy the consistency objective, while foreground objects become fragmented across multiple slots or frequently swap identities. To address these limitations, we propose STAITUS, a unified framework that explicitly disentangles each slot into appearance and geometric pose (position/scale). Leveraging this disentanglement, STAITUS enforces within-frame spatial separation and applies temporal alignment only in appearance space, yielding sharper masks and more persistent identities under motion, occlusion, and object entry/exit. Furthermore, to mitigate over-segmentation, we introduce an adaptive gating mechanism that dynamically adjusts the number of active slots to match scene complexity. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world benchmarks demonstrate that STAITUS substantially outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in segmentation quality and tracking stability.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces STAITUS, a slot-based framework for unsupervised video object tracking that explicitly disentangles each slot into separate appearance and geometric pose (position/scale) components. It enforces within-frame spatial separation on the full slots while restricting temporal alignment to appearance space only, and adds an adaptive gating mechanism to dynamically adjust the number of active slots according to scene complexity. The authors claim this resolves conflicts between consistency objectives and object motion, producing sharper masks and more stable identities under motion, occlusion, and object entry/exit, with substantial gains over baselines on synthetic and real-world benchmarks.

Significance. If the disentanglement is realized without information loss, the work would meaningfully advance object-centric video representations by decoupling temporal consistency from geometric variation, addressing a recurring failure mode in slot models. The adaptive gating mechanism is a practical contribution for handling variable object counts. The approach is internally consistent as described and offers falsifiable predictions via the reported improvements in segmentation quality and tracking stability.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states that experiments demonstrate 'substantial' outperformance but does not name the specific benchmarks or metrics; these should be listed explicitly in §1 or the experiments section for immediate context.
  2. [Method] Notation for the disentangled components (appearance vs. pose latents) and the adaptive gate should be introduced with a clear diagram or equations in the method section to aid reproducibility.
  3. Minor typographical inconsistency: 'STAITUS' is used throughout but the expansion or acronym origin is not stated in the provided text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our manuscript and the recommendation for minor revision. The provided summary correctly reflects the core contributions of STAITUS, including the disentanglement of appearance and pose, appearance-only temporal alignment, spatial separation, and adaptive gating. We will incorporate any minor suggestions in the revised version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is architectural proposal without self-referential reductions

full rationale

The provided abstract and description present STAITUS as an architectural framework that introduces explicit disentanglement of appearance and geometric pose into separate slot components, followed by within-frame spatial separation and appearance-only temporal alignment plus adaptive gating. No equations, loss functions, or derivation steps are shown that define a quantity in terms of itself, rename a fitted parameter as a prediction, or rely on self-citation chains for load-bearing uniqueness claims. The central improvements are stated as direct consequences of the proposed disentanglement and gating choices, which remain independent of the target metrics and do not reduce to the inputs by construction. This is the expected outcome for a method paper whose claims rest on new architectural decisions rather than closed-form derivations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are detailed beyond the standard slot representation and the new disentanglement step.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5743 in / 1083 out tokens · 26260 ms · 2026-06-26T09:02:57.101761+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    In: ICLR (2025) 4

    Akan, K., Yemez, Y.: Slot-guided adaptation of pre-trained diffusion models for object-centric learning and compositional generation. In: ICLR (2025) 4

    2025

  2. [2]

    In: ICCV

    Antol, S., Agrawal, A., Lu, J., Mitchell, M., Batra, D., Zitnick, C.L., Parikh, D.: VQA: Visual question answering. In: ICCV. pp. 2425–2433 (2015) 2

    2015

  3. [3]

    In: ICML

    Biza, O., van Steenkiste, S., Sajjadi, M.S., Mahendran, A., Kipf, T.: Invariant slot attention: Object discovery with slot-centric reference frames. In: ICML. pp. 2507–2527 (2023) 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 10

    2023

  4. [4]

    Burgess, C.P., Matthey, L., Watters, N., Kabra, R., Higgins, I., Botvinick, M., Lerchner,A.:MONet:Unsupervisedscenedecompositionandrepresentation.arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.11390 (2019) 2, 3

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1901

  5. [5]

    In: ICCV

    Caron, M., Touvron, H., Misra, I., Jégou, H., Mairal, J., Bojanowski, P., Joulin, A.: Emerging properties in self-supervised vision transformers. In: ICCV. pp. 9650– 9660 (October 2021) 2, 4, 5, 13

    2021

  6. [6]

    In: ICML

    Chen, M., Radford, A., Child, R., Wu, J., Jun, H., Luan, D., Sutskever, I.: Gener- ative pretraining from pixels. In: ICML. pp. 1691–1703 (2020) 4

    2020

  7. [7]

    IEEE TPAMI47(9), 7689–7703 (2025) 2

    Chen, Z., Dong, S., Yi, K., Li, Y., Ding, M., Torralba, A., Tenenbaum, J.B., Gan, C.: Compositional physical reasoning of objects and events from videos. IEEE TPAMI47(9), 7689–7703 (2025) 2

    2025

  8. [8]

    In: ICLR (2024) 13

    Darcet, T., Oquab, M., Mairal, J., Bojanowski, P.: Vision transformers need reg- isters. In: ICLR (2024) 13

    2024

  9. [9]

    In: NeurIPS (2022) 2, 4

    Elsayed, G.F., Mahendran, A., van Steenkiste, S., Greff, K., Mozer, M.C., Kipf, T.: SAVi++: Towards end-to-end object-centric learning from real-world videos. In: NeurIPS (2022) 2, 4

    2022

  10. [10]

    In: ICLR (2020) 3

    Engelcke, M., Kosiorek, A.R., Jones, O.P., Posner, I.: GENESIS: Generative scene inference and sampling with object-centric latent representations. In: ICLR (2020) 3

    2020

  11. [11]

    In: CVPR

    Fan, K., Bai, Z., Xiao, T., He, T., Horn, M., Fu, Y., Locatello, F., Zhang, Z.: Adaptive slot attention: Object discovery with dynamic slot number. In: CVPR. pp. 23062–23071 (2024) 6, 9, 10, 11

    2024

  12. [12]

    In: CVPR

    Greff, K., Belletti, F., Beyer, L., Doersch, C., Du, Y., Duckworth, D., Fleet, D.J., Gnanapragasam, D., Golemo, F., Herrmann, C., Kipf, T., Kundu, A., Lagun, D., Laradji, I., Liu, H.T.D., Meyer, H., Miao, Y., Nowrouzezahrai, D., Oztireli, C., Pot, E., Radwan, N., Rebain, D., Sabour, S., Sajjadi, M.S.M., Sela, M., Sitzmann, V., Stone, A., Sun, D., Vora, S....

    2022

  13. [13]

    In: ICML (2019) 3

    Greff, K., Kaufman, R.L., Kabra, R., Watters, N., Burgess, C., Zoran, D., Matthey, L., Botvinick, M., Lerchner, A.: Multi-object representation learning with iterative variational inference. In: ICML (2019) 3

    2019

  14. [14]

    In: ECCV

    Hamdan, S., Güney, F.: CarFormer: Self-driving with learned object-centric repre- sentations. In: ECCV. pp. 177–193. Springer (2024) 2

    2024

  15. [15]

    Journal of classification2(1), 193– 218 (1985) 9

    Hubert, L., Arabie, P.: Comparing partitions. Journal of classification2(1), 193– 218 (1985) 9

    1985

  16. [16]

    In: ICLR (2017) 7

    Jang, E., Gu, S., Poole, B.: Categorical reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmax. In: ICLR (2017) 7

    2017

  17. [17]

    In: NeurIPS

    Jiang, J., Deng, F., Singh, G., Ahn, S.: Object-centric slot diffusion. In: NeurIPS. vol. 37 (2023) 2, 3

    2023

  18. [18]

    In: ICLR (2024) 4 16 A

    Jung, W., Yoo, J., Ahn, S., Hong, S.: Learning to compose: Improving object centric learning by injecting compositionality. In: ICLR (2024) 4 16 A. Wei et al

    2024

  19. [19]

    In: CVPR

    Kakogeorgiou, I., Gidaris, S., Karantzalos, K., Komodakis, N.: SPOT: Self-training with patch-order permutation for object-centric learning with autoregressive trans- formers. In: CVPR. pp. 22776–22786 (2024) 4

    2024

  20. [20]

    In: ICLR (2014) 6

    Kingma, D.P., Welling, M.: Auto-encoding variational Bayes. In: ICLR (2014) 6

    2014

  21. [21]

    In: ICLR (2022) 2, 4, 6, 9, 10, 11

    Kipf, T., Elsayed, G.F., Mahendran, A., Stone, A., Sabour, S., Heigold, G., Jon- schkowski, R., Dosovitskiy, A., Greff, K.: Conditional object-centric learning from video. In: ICLR (2022) 2, 4, 6, 9, 10, 11

    2022

  22. [22]

    In: ICLR (2024) 2, 3

    Kirilenko, D., Vorobyov, V., Kovalev, A., Panov, A.: Object-Centric Learning with Slot Mixture Module. In: ICLR (2024) 2, 3

    2024

  23. [23]

    In: CVPR

    Lee, M., Cho, S., Lee, D., Park, C., Lee, J., Lee, S.: Guided slot attention for unsupervised video object segmentation. In: CVPR. pp. 3807–3816 (2024) 4

    2024

  24. [24]

    Neurocomputing409, 1–11 (2020) 2

    Liu, D., Cui, Y., Chen, Y., Zhang, J., Fan, B.: Video object detection for au- tonomous driving: Motion-aid feature calibration. Neurocomputing409, 1–11 (2020) 2

    2020

  25. [25]

    In: ECCV

    Liu, Y., Jia, B., Chen, Y., Huang, S.: SlotLifter: Slot-guided feature lifting for learning object-centric radiance fields. In: ECCV. pp. 270–288 (2024) 4

    2024

  26. [26]

    In: Larochelle, H., Ranzato, M., Hadsell, R., Balcan, M., Lin, H

    Locatello, F., Weissenborn, D., Unterthiner, T., Mahendran, A., Heigold, G., Uszkoreit, J., Dosovitskiy, A., Kipf, T.: Object-centric learning with slot attention. In: Larochelle, H., Ranzato, M., Hadsell, R., Balcan, M., Lin, H. (eds.) NeurIPS. vol. 33, pp. 11525–11538 (2020) 2, 3, 4

    2020

  27. [27]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research36(1), 3–15 (2017) 2

    Maddern, W., Pascoe, G., Linegar, C., Newman, P.: 1 year, 1000 km: The Oxford RobotCar dataset. The International Journal of Robotics Research36(1), 3–15 (2017) 2

    2017

  28. [28]

    TMLR (2025) 2, 3

    Majellaro, R., Collu, J., Plaat, A., Moerland, T.M.: Explicitly disentangled repre- sentations in object-centric learning. TMLR (2025) 2, 3

    2025

  29. [29]

    In: CVPR

    Manasyan, A., Seitzer, M., Radovic, F., Martius, G., Zadaianchuk, A.: Temporally consistent object-centric learning by contrasting slots. In: CVPR. pp. 5401–5411 (2025) 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11

    2025

  30. [30]

    IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence39(1), 128–140 (2016) 9

    Pont-Tuset, J., Arbelaez, P., Barron, J.T., Marques, F., Malik, J.: Multiscale com- binatorial grouping for image segmentation and object proposal generation. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence39(1), 128–140 (2016) 9

    2016

  31. [31]

    Journal of the American Statistical association66(336), 846–850 (1971) 9

    Rand, W.M.: Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. Journal of the American Statistical association66(336), 846–850 (1971) 9

    1971

  32. [32]

    In: ICRA

    Rezazadeh, A., Badithela, A., Desingh, K., Choi, C.: SlotGNN: Unsupervised dis- covery of multi-object representations and visual dynamics. In: ICRA. pp. 17508– 17514 (2024) 2

    2024

  33. [33]

    In: CVPR (2022) 4

    Sajjadi,M.S.M.,Meyer,H.,Pot,E.,Bergmann, U.,Greff,K., Radwan,N., Vora,S., Lucic,M.,Duckworth,D.,Dosovitskiy,A.,Uszkoreit,J.,Funkhouser,T.,Tagliasac- chi, A.: Scene Representation Transformer: Geometry-Free Novel View Synthesis Through Set-Latent Scene Representations. In: CVPR (2022) 4

    2022

  34. [34]

    In: NeurIPS

    Sajjadi, M.S., Duckworth, D., Mahendran, A., Van Steenkiste, S., Pavetic, F., Lu- cic, M., Guibas, L.J., Greff, K., Kipf, T.: Object scene representation transformer. In: NeurIPS. vol. 35, pp. 9512–9524 (2022) 4

    2022

  35. [35]

    In: ICLR (2023) 2, 4, 9, 10

    Seitzer, M., Horn, M., Zadaianchuk, A., Zietlow, D., Xiao, T., Simon-Gabriel, C.J., He, T., Zhang, Z., Schölkopf, B., Brox, T., Locatello, F.: Bridging the Gap to Real- World Object-Centric Learning. In: ICLR (2023) 2, 4, 9, 10

    2023

  36. [36]

    DINOv3

    Siméoni, O., Vo, H.V., Seitzer, M., Baldassarre, F., Oquab, M., Jose, C., Khalidov, V., Szafraniec, M., Yi, S., Ramamonjisoa, M., Massa, F., Haziza, D., Wehrstedt, L., Wang, J., Darcet, T., Moutakanni, T., Sentana, L., Roberts, C., Vedaldi, A., Tolan, J., Brandt, J., Couprie, C., Mairal, J., Jégou, H., Labatut, P., Bojanowski, P.: DINOv3. arXiv preprint a...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    In: ICLR (2022) 3, 4

    Singh, G., Deng, F., Ahn, S.: Illiterate DALL-E learns to compose. In: ICLR (2022) 3, 4

    2022

  38. [38]

    In: CVPR

    Tang, Q., Zhu, X., Lei, Z., Zhang, Z.: Intrinsic physical concepts discovery with object-centric predictive models. In: CVPR. pp. 23252–23261 (2023) 2

    2023

  39. [39]

    In: CVPR

    Tian,P.,Yang,S.,Yu,H.,Kot,A.:Payattentiontotheforegroundinobject-centric learning. In: CVPR. pp. 30281–30290 (2025) 4

    2025

  40. [40]

    IJCV88(2), 284–302 (2010) 2

    Tuytelaars, T., Lampert, C.H., Blaschko, M.B., Buntine, W.: Unsupervised object discovery: A comparison. IJCV88(2), 284–302 (2010) 2

    2010

  41. [41]

    In: ICML (2025) 2

    Villar-Corrales, A., Behnke, S.: PlaySlot: Learning inverse latent dynamics for controllable object-centric video prediction and planning. In: ICML (2025) 2

    2025

  42. [42]

    pp.570–574

    Villar-Corrales, A., Wahdan, I., Behnke, S.: Object-centric video prediction via decoupling of object dynamicsand interactions.In:ICIP. pp.570–574. IEEE (2023) 2

    2023

  43. [43]

    In: CVPR

    Wang, B., Ma, L., Zhang, W., Liu, W.: Reconstruction network for video caption- ing. In: CVPR. pp. 7622–7631 (2018) 2

    2018

  44. [44]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.07017 (2019) 4, 7

    Watters, N., Matthey, L., Burgess, C.P., Lerchner, A.: Spatial broadcast decoder: A simple architecture for learning disentangled representations in VAEs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.07017 (2019) 4, 7

    work page arXiv 1901

  45. [45]

    In: ICLR (2023) 2, 6

    Wu, Z., Dvornik, N., Greff, K., Kipf, T., Garg, A.: SlotFormer: Unsupervised visual dynamics simulation with object-centric models. In: ICLR (2023) 2, 6

    2023

  46. [46]

    In: CVPR

    Xiao, J., Yao, A., Li, Y., Chua, T.S.: Can i trust your answer? visually grounded video question answering. In: CVPR. pp. 13204–13214 (June 2024) 2

    2024

  47. [47]

    In: ICCV

    Yang, L., Fan, Y., Xu, N.: Video instance segmentation. In: ICCV. pp. 5188–5197 (2019) 2, 9

    2019

  48. [48]

    In: ICLR (2020) 2

    Yi, K., Gan, C., Li, Y., Kohli, P., Wu, J., Torralba, A., Tenenbaum, J.B.: CLEVRER: Collision events for video representation and reasoning. In: ICLR (2020) 2

    2020

  49. [49]

    In: NeurIPS

    Zadaianchuk, A., Seitzer, M., Martius, G.: Object-Centric Learning for Real-World Videos by Predicting Temporal Feature Similarities. In: NeurIPS. vol. 37 (2023) 2, 4, 5, 6, 9

    2023

  50. [50]

    In: IJCAI (2025) 2

    Zou, J., Zhu, X., Zhang, Z., Lei, Z.: Top-down guidance for learning object-centric representations. In: IJCAI (2025) 2

    2025