Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Comparing Abstraction in Humans and Large Language Models Using Multimodal Serial Reproduction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.03618 v1 pith:HED2JTLK submitted 2024-02-06 cs.AI cs.CLq-bio.NC

classification cs.AIcs.CLq-bio.NC
keywords humanslanguagereproductionserialabstractionsgpt-4multimodalworld
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Humans extract useful abstractions of the world from noisy sensory data. Serial reproduction allows us to study how people construe the world through a paradigm similar to the game of telephone, where one person observes a stimulus and reproduces it for the next to form a chain of reproductions. Past serial reproduction experiments typically employ a single sensory modality, but humans often communicate abstractions of the world to each other through language. To investigate the effect language on the formation of abstractions, we implement a novel multimodal serial reproduction framework by asking people who receive a visual stimulus to reproduce it in a linguistic format, and vice versa. We ran unimodal and multimodal chains with both humans and GPT-4 and find that adding language as a modality has a larger effect on human reproductions than GPT-4's. This suggests human visual and linguistic representations are more dissociable than those of GPT-4.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Emergence and Effectiveness of Task Vectors in In-Context Learning: An Encoder Decoder Perspective

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Task Decodability, a k-NN measure of how separable a task is in a model's middle-layer representations, tracks and predicts in-context learning accuracy, and early-layer finetuning improves it more than late-layer finetuning.

Pith tools