REVIEW 1 cited by
Comparing Abstraction in Humans and Large Language Models Using Multimodal Serial Reproduction
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Humans extract useful abstractions of the world from noisy sensory data. Serial reproduction allows us to study how people construe the world through a paradigm similar to the game of telephone, where one person observes a stimulus and reproduces it for the next to form a chain of reproductions. Past serial reproduction experiments typically employ a single sensory modality, but humans often communicate abstractions of the world to each other through language. To investigate the effect language on the formation of abstractions, we implement a novel multimodal serial reproduction framework by asking people who receive a visual stimulus to reproduce it in a linguistic format, and vice versa. We ran unimodal and multimodal chains with both humans and GPT-4 and find that adding language as a modality has a larger effect on human reproductions than GPT-4's. This suggests human visual and linguistic representations are more dissociable than those of GPT-4.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Emergence and Effectiveness of Task Vectors in In-Context Learning: An Encoder Decoder Perspective
Task Decodability, a k-NN measure of how separable a task is in a model's middle-layer representations, tracks and predicts in-context learning accuracy, and early-layer finetuning improves it more than late-layer finetuning.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.