pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.08778 · v1 · pith:I2VSOMOEnew · submitted 2026-06-07 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.SR

From filaments to clumps: filament properties with synthetic Herschel observations

Zhen-Xing Ma , Zu-Jia Lu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 18:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR
keywords filamentsstar formationsynthetic observationsHerschelclumpscolumn densityHi-GAL
0
0 comments X

The pith

Filaments host 94 percent of clumps and 93 percent of stars in synthetic star formation observations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper generates synthetic Herschel column density maps from 3D numerical simulations of the Milky Way and applies the FILFINDER algorithm to extract a sample of 8832 filaments containing 110193 branches. It reports that these filaments contain 94 percent of the clumps identified in the synthetic maps and 93 percent of the stars formed in the underlying simulation. Filaments that contain clumps show a median column density of 1.1 times 10 to the 21 per square centimeter, three times higher than the 3.8 times 10 to the 20 value for filaments without clumps. The synthetic filament mass and length distributions follow power laws with indices minus 0.86 and minus 1.71, and the filament-to-background density relation is N_fs proportional to N_bs to the power 0.78, all qualitatively matching the Hi-GAL observational catalogue.

Core claim

Processing synthetic column density maps from 3D simulations with FILFINDER yields 8832 filaments that host 94 percent of clumps and 93 percent of stars. Filaments hosting clumps have median column density 1.1 times 10 to the 21 cm minus 2, compared with 3.8 times 10 to the 20 cm minus 2 for those without clumps. Filament masses and lengths obey power-law distributions with indices alpha_M equals minus 0.86 and alpha_L equals minus 1.71, while filament density scales with background density as N_fs proportional to N_bs to the 0.78, reproducing the statistics of the real Hi-GAL filament catalogue.

What carries the argument

The FILFINDER algorithm applied to synthetic column density maps to identify filaments and measure their correlation with embedded clumps.

If this is right

  • Filaments serve as the dominant sites for clump and star formation in the simulated volume.
  • Only higher-column-density filaments tend to contain clumps.
  • Synthetic filament mass and length distributions reproduce the observed power-law forms.
  • The scaling N_fs proportional to N_bs to the 0.78 appears in both the simulation and the Hi-GAL survey.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The match between synthetic and observed statistics supports using the same filament-finding method on future wide-field surveys.
  • If the underlying simulation physics capture the dominant processes, real Milky Way filaments should show comparable clump-hosting fractions.
  • Varying the simulation resolution or feedback prescriptions could test how sensitive the 94 percent hosting fraction is to those choices.

Load-bearing premise

The FILFINDER algorithm applied to the synthetic column density maps accurately recovers filaments whose properties represent those seen in real Herschel observations.

What would settle it

Finding that the same FILFINDER procedure applied to actual Hi-GAL maps associates substantially fewer than 94 percent of clumps with filaments would falsify the claim that filaments are central to clump formation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.08778 by Zhen-Xing Ma, Zu-Jia Lu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The distributions of physical properties of 51,831 clumps used in this work, which were presented in Lu et al. (2022). The blue, red and green lines are the masses of the clumps derived from SED MSED, the effective radius R, and the temperature of the clumps T, respectively. (Elia et al. 2017, 2021). The “clumps” in this work re￾fer to the compact sources that belong to the common area of PACS+SPIRE, which… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Left panel: synthetic Herschel three-color image of the whole 250 pc simulation at an assumed distance of 2 kpc, with blue, green and red for 70, 160 and 250 µm, respectively. Middle panel: column density derived from the synthetic Herschel observation as shown in the left panel. The black lines show the filamentary structures. Right panel: a zoom-in region marked in the middle panel. The purple ellipses i… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Physical properties of the identified filaments compared with Hi-GAL filaments from Schisano et al. 2020. P anel(a) is the relation of branch length vs. mass. The contours for the synthetic (blue) and Hi-GAL (black) filaments show the number density of 90%, 70%, 50%, 20%, and 5% of the maximum. The dotted line is the critical line mass of 16 M⊙ pc−1 at T = 10 K. P anel(b), (c), (d) are the distributions of… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: PDFs of map pixels. Black: all pixels; blue: non filament regions; red: filament regions; pink: clump on fil￾ament regions; cyan: clump on non filament regions. The grey dashed line represents the log-normal fit. The grey dot￾ted line denotes the MLE power-law fit, with the slope of −5.47. The vertical dotted line marks the lower limit (xmin) adopted for the power-law fitting. the full simulated galactic d… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Column density histograms for our synthetic fil￾aments (blue lines) and the Hi-GAL filaments from Schisano et al. (2020) (black lines). Solid lines indicate structures as￾sociated with clumps, while dashed lines indicate those with￾out clumps. box, which naturally results in a lower background than in Hi-GAL, as expected. This result is consistent with the findings of Lu et al. (2022), which are due to lin… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Correlation between background column den￾sity and filament-averaged column density. Top panel: Fil￾ament background column density versus average filament column density after subtracting the background. Contours show the point density of 90%, 70%, 50%, 20%, and 5% of the maximum for synthetic observations (blue) and Hi￾GAL filaments from Schisano et al. (2020) (black), spanning ∼ 0.2−16 kpc. The blue das… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The normalized distributions of all 2D synthetic clump surface densities (top panel) and 3D volume densities of a sub-sample of clumps which have embedded stars in the corresponding 3D clumps from the 3D simulation (bottom panel). The blue lines represent the clumps from our sim￾ulation, while the black lines (top panel only) represent the clumps from the Hi-GAL survey. Solid lines denote clumps located on… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Top panel: relationship between clump mass (left y-axis) and the line mass (Mline) of their host structures. The red solid contours represent synthetic filaments, while the red dashed contours show the filaments from the Hi-GAL survey (Schisano et al. 2020). The contour levels correspond to 90%, 70%, 50%, 20%, and 5%. The vertical dotted line marks the critical line mass (16 M⊙ pc−1 at T = 10 K). The black… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Stellar mass versus distance to filaments. The red dots are the mass of massive stars. The vertical dashed lines mark the average distances to the filaments, which are nearly identical at 0.33 pc for both massive (red) and low￾mass (blue) stars. rize these branches based on the presence of clumps. The top panel presents the distributions of Mline for filaments belonging to filamentary networks with and wi… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Clump distribution in HFS: blue denotes clumps associated with filaments; red indicates hub-located clumps. ble against radial contraction, this stability likely arises from accretion-driven turbulence (Heigl et al. 2020), where accretion energy continuously converts into in￾ternal turbulent pressure (Federrath 2016), maintaining constant widths even at supercritical line masses (Clarke et al. 2017). 4.3.… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Column density PDFs at times 15.4, 23.3, and 34.2 Myr (from left to right) illustrating the density evolution in the simulated molecular clouds. The grey dashed lines represent the log-normal fits. The grey dotted lines denote the MLE power-law fits, yielding slopes of −6.84, −4.48, and −7.75, respectively. The vertical dotted lines mark the lower limits (xmin) adopted for the power-law fitting. dynamical… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Systematic surveys of filaments have been conducted to study their properties and their relationship to the process of star formation. In this paper, we use synthetic Herschel observations derived from 3D numerical simulations to compute column density maps, then use the \texttt{FILFINDER} algorithm to identify filaments. We obtain a large sample of 8,832 filaments that we further decompose into 110,193 branches. We characterize the physical properties of these filamentary structures and explore their correlations with embedded clumps. Furthermore, we directly compare our synthetic results with an observational catalogue of 32,059 filaments from the Herschel Infrared Galactic Plane Survey (Hi-GAL). Our results show that filaments are central to the star formation process, hosting $94\%$ of clumps from synthetic observations and $93\%$ of stars from our 3D numerical simulation. Filaments that host clumps have higher median column densities ($1.1\times10^{21}\,\rm{cm}^{-2}$) than those without ($3.8\times10^{20}\,\rm{cm}^{-2}$). We find power-law distributions for our synthetic filament masses and lengths, with power-law indexes of $\alpha_{\rm M}=-0.86$ and $\alpha_{\rm L} = -1.71$, respectively. We also find that the relation between the density of filaments and the background density is $N_{\rm{fs}} \propto N_{\rm{bs}}^{0.78}$. The measured properties of the filaments from the 2D synthetic observations are qualitatively consistent with those of the filaments from the Hi-GAL survey.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper uses 3D numerical simulations to generate synthetic Herschel column-density maps, applies the FILFINDER algorithm to extract 8,832 filaments (decomposed into 110,193 branches), and compares their properties to the Hi-GAL catalog of 32,059 filaments. Central results include filaments hosting 94% of synthetic clumps and 93% of 3D-simulated stars, higher median column density for clump-hosting filaments (1.1e21 vs 3.8e20 cm^{-2}), power-law indices alpha_M = -0.86 and alpha_L = -1.71, and the scaling N_fs proportional to N_bs^{0.78}, with qualitative agreement to observations.

Significance. If the 2D-3D association holds, the work supplies a statistically large bridge between simulations and observations, quantifying the role of filaments in hosting star-forming clumps and providing power-law and scaling benchmarks that can be tested against future surveys or higher-resolution simulations. The direct Hi-GAL comparison and use of synthetic observations are clear strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Methods] Abstract and Methods: The central claim that 93% of stars from the 3D simulation are hosted by filaments rests on matching 3D stellar positions to 2D FILFINDER skeletons extracted from projected column-density maps. No validation is described that compares these 2D masks to the underlying 3D density ridges or velocity-coherent structures, leaving open the possibility that line-of-sight projections inflate the reported fraction.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The reported fractions (94% clumps, 93% stars) and median column densities are given without uncertainties, bootstrap errors, or explicit definitions of 'hosting' (e.g., spatial overlap threshold or column-density cut). These quantities are load-bearing for the conclusion that filaments are central to star formation.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be strengthened by stating the precise criteria used to associate clumps and stars with filaments and by reporting uncertainties on the power-law indices and scaling exponent.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below, indicating where revisions will be incorporated.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Methods] Abstract and Methods: The central claim that 93% of stars from the 3D simulation are hosted by filaments rests on matching 3D stellar positions to 2D FILFINDER skeletons extracted from projected column-density maps. No validation is described that compares these 2D masks to the underlying 3D density ridges or velocity-coherent structures, leaving open the possibility that line-of-sight projections inflate the reported fraction.

    Authors: We acknowledge the referee's point that our 2D-3D association relies on projected positions without explicit validation against 3D density ridges. Our procedure projects 3D star and clump coordinates onto the synthetic column-density maps and checks for spatial overlap with the FILFINDER skeletons. We will revise the Methods section to explicitly describe this projection matching, including the one-pixel overlap criterion used to define 'hosting'. A full comparison to 3D ridges or velocity-coherent structures is not included, as the study focuses on replicating observational analysis pipelines; such validation would require substantial new post-processing and is noted as a limitation for future work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The reported fractions (94% clumps, 93% stars) and median column densities are given without uncertainties, bootstrap errors, or explicit definitions of 'hosting' (e.g., spatial overlap threshold or column-density cut). These quantities are load-bearing for the conclusion that filaments are central to star formation.

    Authors: We agree that uncertainties and explicit definitions are needed. In the revised manuscript we will add bootstrap resampling uncertainties to the reported fractions (94% clumps, 93% stars) and median column densities. We will also include a clear definition of 'hosting' in the Methods: a 3D clump or star is hosted if its projected position overlaps the 2D filament mask within one pixel (matching the map resolution). No additional column-density cut is imposed beyond the FILFINDER extraction itself. These additions will be reflected in both the Methods and Abstract. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results are direct measurements from simulation and external catalog comparison

full rationale

The paper applies the FILFINDER algorithm to synthetic 2D column-density maps generated from an independent 3D numerical simulation, then reports measured fractions (94% clumps, 93% stars), median column densities, power-law indices, and the N_fs ∝ N_bs^0.78 scaling as direct outputs of that analysis. These are compared to the external Hi-GAL catalog. No derivation chain, first-principles prediction, self-citation load-bearing step, or uniqueness theorem is present; the reported quantities are statistical summaries of the processed synthetic sample rather than quantities forced by construction from the inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claims depend on the fidelity of the 3D simulation to real physics and on FILFINDER correctly recovering filaments from projected column density; three power-law and scaling parameters are fitted directly to the synthetic output.

free parameters (3)
  • mass power-law index = -0.86
    Fitted to the distribution of filament masses extracted from synthetic observations.
  • length power-law index = -1.71
    Fitted to the distribution of filament lengths extracted from synthetic observations.
  • density scaling exponent = 0.78
    Fitted to the relation between filament number density and background column density.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The 3D numerical simulation accurately captures the physical processes that produce filaments and embedded clumps in real molecular clouds.
    Invoked to interpret synthetic filament statistics as relevant to star formation.
  • domain assumption FILFINDER applied to 2D column density maps recovers the same filament population that would be identified in real Herschel data.
    Required for the qualitative consistency claim with Hi-GAL.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5821 in / 1669 out tokens · 24513 ms · 2026-06-27T18:00:02.729569+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 90 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    2014, PLoS ONE, 9, e85777, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085777 Andr´ e, P., Arzoumanian, D., K¨ onyves, V., Shimajiri, Y., &

    Alstott, J., Bullmore, E., & Plenz, D. 2014, PLoS ONE, 9, e85777, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085777 Andr´ e, P., Arzoumanian, D., K¨ onyves, V., Shimajiri, Y., &

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085777 2014

  2. [2]

    Palmeirim, P. 2019, A&A, 629, L4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935915 17 1019 1020 1021 1022 Average Branch Column Density [cm 2] 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08Normalized Number Hi-GAL with Clumps Hi-GAL without Clumps This Work with Clumps This Work without Clumps Figure A2.Column density histograms for synthetic branches (blue lines) and the Hi-GAL filaments fro...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935915 2019

  3. [3]

    Klessen, C. P. Dullemond, & T. Henning, 27–51, doi: 10.2458/azu uapress 9780816531240-ch002 Andr´ e, P., Men’shchikov, A., Bontemps, S., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L102, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014666

    work page doi:10.2458/azu 2010

  4. [4]

    A&A , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Arzoumanian, D., Andr´ e, P., Didelon, P., et al. 2011, A&A, 529, L6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116596

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116596 2011

  5. [5]

    2019, A&A, 621, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832725

    Arzoumanian, D., Andr´ e, P., K¨ onyves, V., et al. 2019, A&A, 621, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832725

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832725 2019

  6. [6]

    2019, ApJL, 881, L15, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab3416

    Auddy, S., Basu, S., & Kudoh, T. 2019, ApJL, 881, L15, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab3416

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab3416 2019

  7. [7]

    A., & Tafalla, M

    Bergin, E. A., & Tafalla, M. 2007, ARA&A, 45, 339, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.071206.100404

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.45.071206.100404 2007

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    Beuther, H., Kuiper, R., & Tafalla, M. 2025, ARA&A, 63, 1, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-013125-122023

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-013125-122023 2025

  9. [9]

    V., van Leeuwen, J., Maan, Y., et al

    Bilous, A. V., van Leeuwen, J., Maan, Y., et al. 2025, A&A, 696, A194, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451413

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451413 2025

  10. [10]

    , keywords =

    Bonnell, I. A., & Bate, M. R. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 488, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10495.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10495.x 2006

  11. [11]

    J., & Tan, J

    Butler, M. J., & Tan, J. C. 2012, ApJ, 754, 5, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/754/1/5

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/754/1/5 2012

  12. [12]

    2009, ApJS, 181, 360, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/181/2/360

    Simon, R. 2009, ApJS, 181, 360, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/181/2/360

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/181/2/360 2009

  13. [13]

    V., Zhang, Q., Wright, M

    Chen, H.-R. V., Zhang, Q., Wright, M. C. H., et al. 2019, ApJ, 875, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0f3e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab0f3e 2019

  14. [14]

    Hubber, D. A. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 2489, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx637

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx637 2017

  15. [15]

    2013, ApJ, 772, 45, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/772/1/45

    Elia, D., Molinari, S., Fukui, Y., et al. 2013, ApJ, 772, 45, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/772/1/45

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/772/1/45 2013

  16. [16]

    2017, MNRAS, 471, 100, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1357

    Elia, D., Molinari, S., Schisano, E., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 100, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1357

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1357 2017

  17. [17]

    The 360 catalogue of clump physical properties

    Elia, D., Merello, M., Molinari, S., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 504, 2742, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1038

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1038 2021

  18. [18]

    2016, MNRAS, 457, 375, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2880

    Federrath, C. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 375, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2880

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2880 2016

  19. [19]

    S., Schmidt, W., & Mac Low, M.-M

    Federrath, C., Roman-Duval, J., Klessen, R. S., Schmidt, W., & Mac Low, M.-M. 2010, A&A, 512, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912437

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912437 2010

  20. [20]

    J., Hacar, A., Clark, S

    Feng, J., Smith, R. J., Hacar, A., Clark, S. E., & Seifried, D. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 6370, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae407

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae407 2024

  21. [21]

    A., Mackey, J., Grassitelli, L., Romano-D´ ıaz, E., & Porciani, C

    Fichtner, Y. A., Mackey, J., Grassitelli, L., Romano-D´ ıaz, E., & Porciani, C. 2024, A&A, 690, A72, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449638

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449638 2024

  22. [22]

    , keywords =

    Fiege, J. D., & Pudritz, R. E. 2000, MNRAS, 311, 85, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03066.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03066.x 2000

  23. [23]

    2023, A&A, 675, A119, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245784 18

    Ge, Y., Wang, K., Duarte-Cabral, A., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A119, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245784 18

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245784 2023

  24. [24]

    K., Rosdahl, J., et al

    Geen, S., Watson, S. K., Rosdahl, J., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 2548, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2439 G´ omez, G. C., & V´ azquez-Semadeni, E. 2014, ApJ, 791, 124, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/791/2/124

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2439 2018

  25. [25]

    E., Heitsch, F., et al

    Hacar, A., Clark, S. E., Heitsch, F., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 153, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.09562

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.09562 2023

  26. [26]

    2020, MNRAS, 495, 758, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1202

    Heigl, S., Gritschneder, M., & Burkert, A. 2020, MNRAS, 495, 758, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1202

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1202 2020

  27. [27]

    D., Caselli, P., Fontani, F., Jim´ enez-Serra, I., & Tan, J

    Henshaw, J. D., Caselli, P., Fontani, F., Jim´ enez-Serra, I., & Tan, J. C. 2014, MNRAS, 440, 2860, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu446

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu446 2014

  28. [28]

    Hildebrand, R. H. 1983, QJRAS, 24, 267

    1983

  29. [29]

    Howard, A. D. P., Whitworth, A. P., Griffin, M. J., Marsh, K. A., & Smith, M. W. L. 2021, MNRAS, 504, 6157, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1166 Ib´ a˜ nez-Mej´ ıa, J. C., Mac Low, M.-M., Klessen, R. S., &

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1166 2021

  30. [30]

    2017, ApJ, 850, 62, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa93fe

    Baczynski, C. 2017, ApJ, 850, 62, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa93fe

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa93fe 2017

  31. [31]

    2019, A&A, 622, A79, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834354

    Juvela, M. 2019, A&A, 622, A79, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834354

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834354 2019

  32. [32]

    2009, A&A, 508, L35, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913605

    Kainulainen, J., Beuther, H., Henning, T., & Plume, R. 2009, A&A, 508, L35, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913605

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913605 2009

  33. [33]

    Kainulainen, J., & Tan, J. C. 2013, A&A, 549, A53, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219526

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219526 2013

  34. [34]

    L., Evans, N

    Kauffmann, J., Bertoldi, F., Bourke, T. L., Evans, N. J., I., & Lee, C. W. 2008, A&A, 487, 993, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809481

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809481 2008

  35. [35]

    Kelly, B. C. 2007, ApJ, 665, 1489, doi: 10.1086/519947

    work page doi:10.1086/519947 2007

  36. [36]

    C., Bourke, T

    Kirk, H., Myers, P. C., Bourke, T. L., et al. 2013, ApJ, 766, 115, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/766/2/115

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/766/2/115 2013

  37. [37]

    W., & Rosolowsky, E

    Koch, E. W., & Rosolowsky, E. W. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 3435, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1521 K¨ onyves, V., Andr´ e, P., Men’shchikov, A., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, A91, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525861

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1521 2015

  38. [38]

    G., Norman, M

    Kritsuk, A. G., Norman, M. L., & Wagner, R. 2011, ApJL, 727, L20, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/727/1/L20

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/727/1/l20 2011

  39. [39]

    R., & McKee, C

    Krumholz, M. R., & McKee, C. F. 2008, Nature, 451, 1082, doi: 10.1038/nature06620

    work page doi:10.1038/nature06620 2008

  40. [40]

    Kumar, M. S. N., Arzoumanian, D., Men’shchikov, A., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A114, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140363

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140363 2022

  41. [41]

    Inutsuka, S. I. 2020, A&A, 642, A87, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038232

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038232 2020

  42. [42]

    A., Strom, K

    Lada, E. A., Strom, K. M., & Myers, P. C. 1993, in Protostars and Planets III, ed. E. H. Levy & J. I. Lunine, 245

    1993

  43. [43]

    Larson, R. B. 1985, MNRAS, 214, 379, doi: 10.1093/mnras/214.3.379

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/214.3.379 1985

  44. [44]

    S., Leurini, S., et al

    Li, G.-X., Urquhart, J. S., Leurini, S., et al. 2016, A&A, 591, A5, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527468

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527468 2016

  45. [45]

    B., et al

    Lu, X., Zhang, Q., Liu, H. B., et al. 2018, ApJ, 855, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaad11

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaad11 2018

  46. [46]

    2022, MNRAS, 510, 1697, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3517

    Lu, Z.-J., Pelkonen, V.-M., Juvela, M., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 1697, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3517

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3517 2022

  47. [47]

    2020, ApJ, 904, 58, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abbd8f

    Lu, Z.-J., Pelkonen, V.-M., Padoan, P., et al. 2020, ApJ, 904, 58, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abbd8f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbd8f 2020

  48. [48]

    2023, A&A, 676, A15, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346248

    Ma, Y., Zhou, J., Esimbek, J., et al. 2023, A&A, 676, A15, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346248

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346248 2023

  49. [49]

    F., & Tan, J

    McKee, C. F., & Tan, J. C. 2002, Nature, 416, 59, doi: 10.1038/416059a

    work page doi:10.1038/416059a 2002

  50. [50]

    2011, A&A, 530, A133, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014752

    Molinari, S., Schisano, E., Faustini, F., et al. 2011, A&A, 530, A133, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014752

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014752 2011

  51. [51]

    2010, A&A, 518, L100, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014659

    Molinari, S., Swinyard, B., Bally, J., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L100, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014659

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014659 2010

  52. [52]

    2018, ARA&A, 56, 41, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055235

    Motte, F., Bontemps, S., & Louvet, F. 2018, ARA&A, 56, 41, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055235

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055235 2018

  53. [53]

    Myers, P. C. 2009, ApJ, 700, 1609, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/1609

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/700/2/1609 2009

  54. [54]

    1994, A&A, 291, 943

    Ossenkopf, V., & Henning, T. 1994, A&A, 291, 943

    1994

  55. [55]

    1964, ApJ, 140, 1056, doi: 10.1086/148005

    Ostriker, J. 1964, ApJ, 140, 1056, doi: 10.1086/148005

    work page doi:10.1086/148005 1964

  56. [56]

    2017, ApJ, 840, 48, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6afa

    Padoan, P., Haugbølle, T., Nordlund, ˚A., & Frimann, S. 2017, ApJ, 840, 48, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6afa

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6afa 2017

  57. [57]

    2016a, ApJ, 826, 140, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/140

    Padoan, P., Juvela, M., Pan, L., Haugbølle, T., & Nordlund, ˚A. 2016a, ApJ, 826, 140, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/140

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/826/2/140

  58. [58]

    Padoan, P., Nordlund, A., & Jones, B. J. T. 1997, MNRAS, 288, 145, doi: 10.1093/mnras/288.1.145

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/288.1.145 1997

  59. [59]

    2016b, ApJ, 822, 11, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/822/1/11

    Padoan, P., Pan, L., Haugbølle, T., & Nordlund, ˚A. 2016b, ApJ, 822, 11, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/822/1/11

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/822/1/11

  60. [60]

    2020, ApJ, 900, 82, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abaa47

    Padoan, P., Pan, L., Juvela, M., Haugbølle, T., & Nordlund, ˚A. 2020, ApJ, 900, 82, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abaa47

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abaa47 2020

  61. [61]

    2023, MNRAS, 522, 3548, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1213

    Padoan, P., Pelkonen, V.-M., Juvela, M., Haugbølle, T., & Nordlund, ˚A. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 3548, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1213

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1213 2023

  62. [62]

    2016, ApJ, 825, 30, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/30

    Pan, L., Padoan, P., Haugbølle, T., & Nordlund, ˚A. 2016, ApJ, 825, 30, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/30

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/825/1/30 2016

  63. [63]

    Andrews, J. J. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 2529, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3060

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3060 2017

  64. [64]

    1998, PhRvE, 58, 4501, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.58.4501

    Passot, T., & V´ azquez-Semadeni, E. 1998, PhRvE, 58, 4501, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.58.4501

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.58.4501 1998

  65. [65]

    A., Duarte-Cabral, A., et al

    Peretto, N., Fuller, G. A., Duarte-Cabral, A., et al. 2013, A&A, 555, A112, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321318

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321318 2013

  66. [66]

    A., Andr´ e, P., et al

    Peretto, N., Fuller, G. A., Andr´ e, P., et al. 2014, A&A, 561, A83, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322172 19

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322172 2014

  67. [67]

    Pillsworth, R., & Pudritz, R. E. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 209, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae002

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae002 2024

  68. [68]

    E., & Koch, E

    Pillsworth, R., Roscoe, E., Pudritz, R. E., & Koch, E. W. 2025a, ApJ, 987, 20, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/add68a —. 2025b, ApJ, 989, 233, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adf62c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add68a

  69. [69]

    R., Issac, N., et al

    Potdar, A., Das, S. R., Issac, N., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 658, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3479

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3479 2022

  70. [70]

    R., Zavagno, A., et al

    Rawat, V., Samal, M. R., Zavagno, A., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 540, 2377, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf807

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf807 2025

  71. [71]

    R., Walker, D

    Rawat, V., Samal, M. R., Walker, D. L., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 2199, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae060

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae060 2024

  72. [72]

    Schisano, E., Rygl, K. L. J., Molinari, S., et al. 2014, ApJ, 791, 27, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/791/1/27

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/791/1/27 2014

  73. [73]

    2020, MNRAS, 492, 5420, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3466

    Schisano, E., Molinari, S., Elia, D., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 5420, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3466

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3466 2020

  74. [74]

    The spatial distribution of dense cores during the evolution of cluster-forming massive clumps

    Schisano, E., Molinari, S., Coletta, A., et al. 2026, A&A, 707, A221, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555619

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555619 2026

  75. [75]

    2010, A&A, 520, A49, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014481

    Schneider, N., Csengeri, T., Bontemps, S., et al. 2010, A&A, 520, A49, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014481

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014481 2010

  76. [76]

    2012, A&A, 540, L11, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118566

    Schneider, N., Csengeri, T., Hennemann, M., et al. 2012, A&A, 540, L11, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118566

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118566 2012

  77. [77]

    2013, ApJL, 766, L17, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/766/2/L17

    Schneider, N., Andr´ e, P., K¨ onyves, V., et al. 2013, ApJL, 766, L17, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/766/2/L17

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/766/2/l17 2013

  78. [78]

    2015, A&A, 575, A79, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423569

    Schneider, N., Ossenkopf, V., Csengeri, T., et al. 2015, A&A, 575, A79, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423569

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423569 2015

  79. [79]

    2022, A&A, 666, A165, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039610

    Schneider, N., Ossenkopf-Okada, V., Clarke, S., et al. 2022, A&A, 666, A165, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039610

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039610 2022

  80. [80]

    2017, MNRAS, 467, 4467, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx399

    Seifried, D., S´ anchez-Monge,´A., Suri, S., & Walch, S. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 4467, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx399

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx399 2017

Showing first 80 references.