Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 57 references

SyncGuard: Robust Audio Watermarking Capable of Countering Desynchronization Attacks

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read SyncGuard claims to watermark arbitrary-length audio with no localization step, beating current methods.

desk verdict The submission is an abstract about an audio watermarking system attached to an unrelated fluxonium-qubit paper; there is no SyncGuard content to evaluate. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.17121 v2 pith:I7MKU2IW submitted 2025-08-23 cs.CR cs.MMcs.SD

Zhenliang Gan , Xiaoxiao Hu , Sheng Li , Zhenxing Qian , Xinpeng Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CRcs.MMcs.SD
keywords audiowatermarkingdesynchronizationattacksarbitrary-lengthframe-wisebroadcastembeddingdistortionlayerdilatedconvolutioncopyrightprotectionsourcetracing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to establish a learning-based audio watermarking scheme, SyncGuard, that embeds a watermark into audio of arbitrary length using a frame-wise broadcast strategy, so extraction no longer needs to locate where the watermark was placed. It further claims that a deliberately designed distortion layer, together with dilated residual and dilated gated blocks, makes the watermark survive desynchronization attacks such as cropping, time stretching, and shifting, and that SyncGuard outperforms existing methods in robustness while preserving auditory quality. The delivered full text, however, does not contain the SyncGuard paper: what arrives is an unrelated quantum-physics manuscript about a fluxonium electromechanical system. A sympathetic reading of the abstract therefore has to stand on the abstract alone, since none of the promised architecture, distortion layer, experiments, or comparisons appears in the body.

What carries the argument

The central object is the frame-wise broadcast embedding: the watermark is spread over all frames of the audio, making the representation time-independent so that extraction needs no knowledge of where the watermark starts or ends. Around it the paper builds a distortion layer, a trainable simulation of desynchronization attacks, and a network of dilated residual and dilated gated blocks meant to capture multi-resolution time-frequency features. Together these are claimed to let the decoder read the payload from any aligned or shifted segment of arbitrary length.

What would settle it

Open the actual submission file and search for 'SyncGuard', 'watermark', or 'distortion layer': the delivered full text is a fluxonium qubit electromechanics paper and contains none of these terms, which already overturns the assumption that the abstract's claims are supported by the accompanying manuscript.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that desynchronization robustness can be won by design rather than repaired at extraction: broadcasting the watermark across every time frame makes each frame independently carry the payload, so variable-length audio can be processed without a localization stage. The claimed robustness to attacks is attributed to a distortion layer that simulates real-world desynchronization during training, and the time-frequency feature extraction is handled by dilated residual and dilated gated blocks. The paper asserts that this combination handles variable-length segments, beats state-of-the-art methods, and keeps audio quality high. None of this content is present in the delivered full text, which concerns an unrelated topic.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the meticulously designed distortion layer faithfully mimics real desynchronization attacks, so that robustness learned against simulated attacks transfers to real re-encoding, cropping, and time-stretching; in the delivered text this premise is unverifiable because no method or experiment for SyncGuard appears anywhere in the body.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If SyncGuard works as claimed, watermark extraction on variable-length audio becomes a single forward pass over the received segment, with no prior localization of the embedded region.
  • Robustness to cropping, shifting, and time-stretching would follow from the broadcast property: losing some frames still leaves the replicated payload intact.
  • Because the distortion layer is part of training, the scheme would inherit robustness only against the kinds of desynchronization the distortion layer can reproduce.
  • Dilated residual and gated blocks would let the decoder integrate long-range time-frequency context, which is what makes frame-level decisions reliable after re-encoding.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the delivered full text is an unrelated quantum-physics manuscript, every experimental claim in the abstract is currently unverified; a reader should treat the reported results as asserted but not yet evidenced.
  • If frame-wise broadcast embedding is as effective as claimed, the natural extension is to very long or streaming audio, since the same mechanism should in principle handle arbitrarily sized inputs without segmentation.
  • A testable corollary is that performance under attacks should degrade gracefully with the fraction of frames destroyed, since the payload is replicated per frame; measuring bit error rate versus crop fraction would isolate the broadcast contribution from the distortion layer's contribution.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The submission is titled "SyncGuard: Robust Audio Watermarking Capable of Countering Desynchronization Attacks" and its abstract claims a learning-based audio watermarking scheme with frame-wise broadcast embedding, a distortion layer for robustness against desynchronization attacks, dilated residual and gated blocks, and extensive experimental results outperforming state-of-the-art methods. However, the full text of the submission is an unrelated physics manuscript, arXiv:2508.17105v2, "A fluxonium qubit-based hybrid electromechanical system," with different authors, title, and subject matter. The body contains no mention of SyncGuard, audio watermarking, frame-wise broadcast embedding, a distortion layer, dilated blocks, or any experimental evaluation of the claimed system. As delivered, the manuscript contains an abstract for one paper and the body of another, so the central claims of the abstract have no supporting methods, derivations, or empirical evidence within the submission.

Significance. If the SyncGuard claims were substantiated, the contribution would be significant for audio watermarking: a localization-free embedding scheme for arbitrary-length audio, a distortion layer explicitly designed for desynchronization robustness, and empirical evidence of state-of-the-art robustness and audio quality. That would be a useful practical result. However, the significance cannot be assessed from the delivered manuscript because none of the supporting content for SyncGuard is present. The submission offers no method description, no architecture definition, no experimental protocol, no datasets, no comparisons, and no code or reproducibility artifacts. The abstract's claims are therefore unsupported assertions rather than evaluated scientific claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Whole manuscript] The full text is a completely unrelated theoretical physics paper on a fluxonium qubit electromechanical system. Sections I through V and Appendices A through C contain no definition of SyncGuard, no frame-wise broadcast embedding strategy, no distortion layer, no dilated residual or gated blocks, and no watermarking evaluation. The central design claim in the abstract cannot be checked because the method section is absent.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract's sentence "Extensive experimental results show that SyncGuard efficiently handles variable-length audio segments, outperforms state-of-the-art methods in robustness against various attacks, and delivers superior auditory quality" is unsupported by any experimental section, dataset description, baseline protocol, evaluation metric, or error bar in the submission. There are no comparisons against state-of-the-art methods anywhere in the delivered text.
  3. [Abstract and title] The claim that frame-wise broadcast embedding eliminates the need for watermark localization in arbitrary-length audio is not backed by any mathematical formulation, algorithm description, or robustness analysis. Even taking the abstract at face value, there is no stated invariance property, no definition of how variable-length segments are processed, and no argument showing that extraction succeeds without synchronization. Without this content, the central technical contribution cannot be evaluated.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The architecture description in the abstract is limited to a single sentence mentioning dilated residual blocks and dilated gated blocks; no figure, equation, or pseudocode accompanies this description in the full text.
  2. [References] All fifty-five references in the full text concern superconducting qubits, cavity optomechanics, and related physics topics; none pertain to audio watermarking, neural audio processing, or desynchronization attacks, further confirming that the body does not correspond to the abstract.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity can be demonstrated because the delivered full text is an unrelated fluxonium-qubit preprint, so SyncGuard's method and experiments are absent and no derivation reduces to its inputs.

full rationale

The submitted abstract claims that SyncGuard uses a frame-wise broadcast embedding strategy, a meticulously designed distortion layer, dilated residual blocks, and extensive experiments to outperform state-of-the-art methods, but the delivered full text is arXiv:2508.17105v2, 'A fluxonium qubit-based hybrid electromechanical system', by different authors, which never mentions SyncGuard, audio watermarking, desynchronization attacks, or any distortion layer. There is therefore no derivation chain, no method equations, no training protocol, and no experimental comparison in the document that could be examined for circularity. Under the rule that circularity may be claimed only when a specific reduction can be quoted and exhibited, such as an equation that equals its own input by construction or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, I find no such step. The mismatch between the abstract and the full text is a serious evidentiary and integrity problem that makes the paper's claims unverifiable, but it is not, on the evidence available, a demonstrated circularity. Accordingly, the appropriate circularity finding is no significant circularity, with the caveat that the document as delivered does not support any of the abstract's substantive claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This ledger is necessarily thin because the full text of the submission is an unrelated physics preprint. The abstract names no fitted constants, so the only recognizable tuned components are the trained network and its distortion layer, whose attack configuration is undisclosed. The axioms listed are the two load-bearing design assumptions the abstract states in one sentence each. No invented entities are introduced. A full SyncGuard manuscript would require listing the model hyperparameters, the distortion layer schedule, and the evaluation protocol to make the ledger complete.

free parameters (1)
  • Distortion layer and training attack configuration
    The abstract credits a meticulously designed distortion layer for robustness, but gives no settings for which attacks, strengths, or durations were simulated during training. In learned watermarking these choices directly determine the reported robustness, so they are effectively tuned quantities that the delivered document does not disclose.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Simulated attacks in the distortion layer transfer to real-world desynchronization attacks
    The abstract's robustness claim depends on the distortion layer capturing real audio manipulations such as cropping, resampling, and time stretching. No evidence for this transfer is provided in the delivered document.
  • domain assumption Frame-wise broadcast embedding removes the need for watermark localization in arbitrary-length audio
    The abstract asserts time-independence and localization-free extraction as design properties, but no derivation or experiment supporting them appears in the delivered document.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SyncGuard: Robust Audio Watermarking Capable of Countering Desynchronization Attacks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/I7MKU2IW

@misc{pith2026250817121,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SyncGuard: Robust Audio Watermarking Capable of Countering Desynchronization Attacks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/I7MKU2IW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.17121}
}
read the original abstract

Audio watermarking has been widely applied in copyright protection and source tracing. However, due to the inherent characteristics of audio signals, watermark localization and resistance to desynchronization attacks remain significant challenges. In this paper, we propose a learning-based scheme named SyncGuard to address these challenges. Specifically, we design a frame-wise broadcast embedding strategy to embed the watermark in arbitrary-length audio, enhancing time-independence and eliminating the need for localization during watermark extraction. To further enhance robustness, we introduce a meticulously designed distortion layer. Additionally, we employ dilated residual blocks in conjunction with dilated gated blocks to effectively capture multi-resolution time-frequency features. Extensive experimental results show that SyncGuard efficiently handles variable-length audio segments, outperforms state-of-the-art methods in robustness against various attacks, and delivers superior auditory quality.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Krantz, M

    P. Krantz, M. Kjaergaard, F. Yan, T. P. Orlando, S. Gus- tavsson, and W. D. Oliver, A Quantum Engineer’s Guide to Superconducting Qubits, Applied Physics Reviews6, 021318 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Kjaergaard, M

    M. Kjaergaard, M. E. Schwartz, J. Braum¨ uller, P. Krantz, J. I.-J. Wang, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Superconducting qubits: Current state of play, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics11, 369 (2020)

    2020

  3. [3]

    Mamgain, S

    A. Mamgain, S. S. Khaire, U. Singhal, I. Ahmad, L. A. Patel, K. D. Helambe, S. Majumder, V. Singh, and B. Suri, A Review of Developments in Superconducting Quantum Processors, Journal of the Indian Institute of Science103, 633 (2023)

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Blais, A

    A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025005 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    J. Koch, T. M. Yu, J. Gambetta, A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Charge-insensitive qubit design de- rived from the cooper pair box, Phys. Rev. A76, 042319 (2007)

    2007

  6. [6]

    V. E. Manucharyan, J. Koch, L. I. Glazman, and M. H. Devoret, Fluxonium: Single cooper-pair circuit free of charge offsets, Science326, 113 (2009)

    2009

  7. [7]

    Earnest, S

    N. Earnest, S. Chakram, Y. Lu, N. Irons, R. Naik, N. Leung, L. Ocola, D. Czaplewski, B. Baker, J. Lawrence, J. Koch, and D. Schuster, Realization of a$\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}$System with Metastable States of a Capacitively Shunted Fluxonium, Physical Review Letters120, 150504 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    L. B. Nguyen, Y.-H. Lin, A. Somoroff, R. Mencia, N. Grabon, and V. E. Manucharyan, High-coherence flux- onium qubit, Phys. Rev. X9, 041041 (2019)

    2019

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Somoroff, Q

    A. Somoroff, Q. Ficheux, R. A. Mencia, H. Xiong, R. Kuzmin, and V. E. Manucharyan, Millisecond coher- ence in a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 267001 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    Zhang, S

    H. Zhang, S. Chakram, T. Roy, N. Earnest, Y. Lu, Z. Huang, D. Weiss, J. Koch, and D. I. Schuster, Uni- versal Fast-Flux Control of a Coherent, Low-Frequency Qubit, Physical Review X11, 011010 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    G. Zhu, D. G. Ferguson, V. E. Manucharyan, and J. Koch, Circuit qed with fluxonium qubits: Theory of the dispersive regime, Phys. Rev. B87, 024510 (2013)

    2013

  4. [12]

    J. Koch, V. Manucharyan, M. H. Devoret, and L. I. Glaz- man, Charging effects in the inductively shunted joseph- son junction, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 217004 (2009)

    2009

  5. [13]

    L. Ding, M. Hays, Y. Sung, B. Kannan, J. An, A. Di Paolo, A. H. Karamlou, T. M. Hazard, K. Azar, D. K. Kim,et al., High-fidelity, frequency-flexible two- qubit fluxonium gates with a transmon coupler, Physical Review X13, 031035 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Kuzmin, R

    R. Kuzmin, R. Mencia, N. Grabon, N. Mehta, Y.-H. Lin, and V. E. Manucharyan, Quantum electrodynamics of a superconductor–insulator phase transition, Nature Physics15, 930 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    N. R. Lee, Y. Guo, A. Y. Cleland, E. A. Wollack, R. G. Gruenke, T. Makihara, Z. Wang, T. Rajabzadeh, W. Jiang, F. M. Mayor, P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, C. J. Sara- balis, and A. H. Safavi-Naeini, Strong Dispersive Cou- pling Between a Mechanical Resonator and a Fluxo- nium Supercond...

    2023

  8. [16]

    Bao and H

    F. Bao and H. e. a. Deng, Fluxonium: An alternative qubit platform for high-fidelity operations, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 010502 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    L. B. Nguyen, G. Koolstra, Y. Kim, A. Morvan, T. Chis- tolini, S. Singh, K. N. Nesterov, C. J¨ unger, L. Chen, Z. Pedramrazi,et al., Blueprint for a high-performance fluxonium quantum processor, PRX Quantum3, 037001 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Najera-Santos, R

    B.-L. Najera-Santos, R. Rousseau, K. Gerashchenko, H. Patange, A. Riva, M. Villiers, T. Briant, P.-F. Cohadon, A. Heidmann, J. Palomo, M. Rosticher, H. le Sueur, A. Sarlette, W. Smith, Z. Leghtas, E. Flurin, T. Jacqmin, and S. Del´ eglise, High-Sensitivity ac-Charge Detection ...

    2024

  11. [19]

    In this work, we present a detailed theoretical investi- gation of a hybrid system comprising a fluxonium qubit coupled to a mechanical resonator by a flux-mediated coupling

    has been demonstrated. In this work, we present a detailed theoretical investi- gation of a hybrid system comprising a fluxonium qubit coupled to a mechanical resonator by a flux-mediated coupling. The electromechanical coupling can be real- ized by embedding the mechanical re...

    2023

  12. [20]

    Gerashchenko, R

    K. Gerashchenko, R. Rousseau, L. Balembois, H. Patange, P. Manset, W. C. Smith, Z. Leghtas, E. Flurin, T. Jacqmin, and S. Del´ eglise, Probing the quantum motion of a macroscopic mechanical oscillator with a radio-frequency superconducting qubit, arXiv (2025), quant-ph

    2025

  13. [21]

    Chu and S

    Y. Chu and S. Groblacher, A perspective on hybrid quan- tum opto- and electromechanical systems, Appl. Phys. Lett.117, 150503 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Clerk, K

    A. Clerk, K. Lehnert, P. Bertet, J. Petta, and y. Naka- mura, Hybrid quantum systems with circuit quantum electrodynamics., Nature Physics16, 257 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Xiang, S

    Z.-L. Xiang, S. Ashhab, J. Q. You, and F. Nori, Hybrid quantum circuits: Superconducting circuits interacting with other quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 623 (2013)

    2013

  16. [24]

    A. D. O’Connell, M. Hofheinz, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bial- czak, M. Lenander, E. Lucero, M. Neeley, D. Sank, H. Wang, M. Weides, J. Wenner, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, Quantum ground state and single-phonon control of a mechanical resonator, Nature464, 697 (2010)

    2010

  17. [25]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Reviews of Modern Physics86, 1391 (2014)

    2014

  18. [26]

    Barzanjeh, A

    S. Barzanjeh, A. Xuereb, S. Gr¨ oblacher, M. Paternostro, C. A. Regal, and E. M. Weig, Optomechanics for quan- tum technologies, Nature Physics18, 15 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    N. Lauk, N. Sinclair, S. Barzanjeh, J. P. Covey, M. Saffman, M. Spiropulu, and C. Simon, Perspectives on quantum transduction, Quantum Science and Tech- nology5, 020501 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Mirhosseini, A

    M. Mirhosseini, A. Sipahigil, M. Kalaee, and O. Painter, Superconducting qubit to optical photon transduction., Nature588, 599–603 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    J. D. Teufel, T. Donner, D. Li, J. W. Harlow, M. S. Allman, K. Cicak, A. J. Sirois, J. D. Whittaker, K. W. Lehnert, and R. W. Simmonds, Sideband cooling of mi- cromechanical motion to the quantum ground state, Na- ture475, 359 (2011)

    2011

  22. [30]

    Pirkkalainen, S

    J.-M. Pirkkalainen, S. U. Cho, J. Li, G. S. Paraoanu, P. J. Hakonen, and M. A. Sillanp¨ a¨ a, Hybrid circuit cavity quantum electrodynamics with a micromechanical res- 11 onator, Nature494, 211 (2013)

    2013

  23. [31]

    J. J. Viennot, X. Ma, and K. W. Lehnert, Phonon- Number-Sensitive Electromechanics, Physical Review Letters121, 183601 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    I. C. Rodrigues, D. Bothner, and G. A. Steele, Cou- pling microwave photons to a mechanical resonator using quantum interference, Nature Communications10, 5359 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    Schmidt, M

    P. Schmidt, M. T. Amawi, S. Pogorzalek, F. Deppe, A. Marx, R. Gross, and H. Huebl, Sideband-resolved res- onator electromechanics based on a nonlinear Josephson inductance probed on the single-photon level, Communi- cations Physics3, 1 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    T. Bera, S. Majumder, S. K. Sahu, and V. Singh, Large flux-mediated coupling in hybrid electromechanical sys- tem with a transmon qubit, Communications Physics4, 1 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    F. Xue, Y. D. Wang, C. P. Sun, H. Okamoto, H. Ya- maguchi, and K. Semba, Controllable coupling between flux qubit and nanomechanical resonator by magnetic field, New Journal of Physics9, 35 (2007)

    2007

  28. [36]

    Y. Chu, P. Khare, and W. H. Renninger, Quantum acous- tics with superconducting qubits, New J. Phys.358, 199 (2017)

    2017

  29. [37]

    Arrangoiz-Arriola, E

    P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, E. A. Wollack, Z. Wang, M. Pechal, W. Jiang, T. P. McKenna, J. D. Witmer, R. Van Laer, and A. H. Safavi-Naeini, Resolving the energy levels of a nanomechanical oscillator, Nature571, 537 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Bienfait, K

    A. Bienfait, K. J. Satzinger, Y. Zhong, H.-S. Chang, M.- H. Chou, C. R. Conner, ´E. Dumur, J. Grebel, G. A. Peairs, R. G. Povey,et al., Phonon-mediated quantum state transfer and remote qubit entanglement, Science 364, 368 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    Y. Yang, I. Kladari´ c, M. Drimmer, U. von L¨ upke, D. Lenterman, J. Bus, S. Marti, M. Fadel, and Y. Chu, A mechanical qubit, New J. Phys.386, 783 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    Poot and H

    M. Poot and H. S. J. van der Zant, Mechanical systems in the quantum regime, Physics Reports Mechanical sys- tems in the quantum regime,511, 273 (2012)

    2012

  33. [41]

    Y.-D. Wang, Y. Li, F. Xue, C. Bruder, and K. Semba, Cooling a micromechanical resonator by quantum back- action from a noisy qubit, Phys. Rev. B80, 144508 (2009)

    2009

  34. [42]

    Jaehne, K

    K. Jaehne, K. Hammerer, and M. Wallquist, Ground- state cooling of a nanomechanical resonator via a cooper- pair box qubit, New Journal of Physics10, 095019 (2008)

    2008

  35. [43]

    Q. Liao, H. Qiu, M. Xiao, and W. Nie, Probe absorp- tion characteristics and a tunable susceptibility switch of a superconducting flux qubit coupled to two mechan- ical resonators, Optics & Laser Technology159, 108992 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    J. P. Marangos, Electromagnetically induced trans- parency, Journal of Modern Optics45, 471 (1998)

    1998

  37. [45]

    Fleischhauer, A

    M. Fleischhauer, A. Imamoglu, and J. P. Marangos, Elec- tromagnetically induced transparency: Optics in coher- ent media, Reviews of modern physics77, 633 (2005)

    2005

  38. [46]

    Rabl, Cooling of mechanical motion with a two-level system: The high-temperature regime, Phys

    P. Rabl, Cooling of mechanical motion with a two-level system: The high-temperature regime, Phys. Rev. B82, 165320 (2010)

    2010

  39. [47]

    X. You, J. A. Sauls, and J. Koch, Circuit quantization in the presence of time-dependent external flux, Phys. Rev. B99, 174512 (2019)

    2019

  40. [48]

    Wilson-Rae, P

    I. Wilson-Rae, P. Zoller, and A. Imamo¯ glu, Laser Cool- ing of a Nanomechanical Resonator Mode to its Quan- tum Ground State, Physical Review Letters92, 075507 (2004)

    2004

  41. [49]

    Marquardt, J

    F. Marquardt, J. P. Chen, A. A. Clerk, and S. M. Girvin, Quantum Theory of Cavity-Assisted Sideband Cooling of Mechanical Motion, Physical Review Letters99, 093902 (2007)

    2007

  42. [50]

    I. M. Pop, K. Geerlings, G. Catelani, R. J. Schoelkopf, L. I. Glazman, and M. H. Devoret, Coherent suppres- sion of electromagnetic dissipation due to superconduct- ing quasiparticles, Nature508, 369 (2014)

    2014

  43. [51]

    J¨ ahne, C

    K. J¨ ahne, C. Genes, K. Hammerer, M. Wallquist, E. Polzik, and P. Zoller, Cavity-assisted squeezing of a mechanical oscillator, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics79, 063819 (2009)

    2009

  44. [52]

    Vidal and R

    G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, Computable measure of en- tanglement, Physical Review A65, 032314 (2002)

    2002

  45. [53]

    M. B. Plenio and S. Virmani, An introduction to en- tanglement measures, arXiv preprint quant-ph/0504163 (2005)

    2005 arXiv

  46. [54]

    M. B. Plenio, Logarithmic negativity: a full entanglement monotone that is not convex, Physical review letters95, 090503 (2005)

    2005

  47. [55]

    Vitali, S

    D. Vitali, S. Gigan, A. Ferreira, H. B¨ ohm, P. Tombesi, A. Guerreiro, V. Vedral, . f. A. Zeilinger, and M. As- pelmeyer, Optomechanical entanglement between a mov- able mirror and a cavity field, Physical review letters98, 030405 (2007)

    2007

  48. [56]

    Wang and A

    Y.-D. Wang and A. A. Clerk, Reservoir-engineered en- tanglement in optomechanical systems, Physical review letters110, 253601 (2013). 12 Appendix A: Pump-probe analysis The Hamiltonian of the qubit-mechanical system in the presence of pump and probe drives at the flux point Φe...

    2013

  49. [57]

    This leads to the semi-classical approximation⟨ˆσ ±(ˆb+ ˆb†)⟩=⟨ˆσ±⟩⟨(ˆb+ ˆb†)⟩

    The mechanical resonator, due to its low frequency, is assumed to be in thermal state, and can be treated as a classical resonator coupled to the qubit. This leads to the semi-classical approximation⟨ˆσ ±(ˆb+ ˆb†)⟩=⟨ˆσ±⟩⟨(ˆb+ ˆb†)⟩. By substituting this in the above equation, ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.