pith. sign in

arxiv: 1306.4469 · v2 · pith:IA26KIUYnew · submitted 2013-06-19 · 📊 stat.AP · stat.CO

An empirical study to check the accuracy of approximating averages of ratios using ratios of averages

classification 📊 stat.AP stat.CO
keywords ratiosaveragesnumberdistributiondistributionspublicationratiosignificant
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

For a number of researchers a number of publications for each author is simulated using the zeta distribution and then for each publication a number of citations per publication simulated. Bootstrap confidence intervals indicate that the difference between the average of ratios and the ratio of averages are not significant, and there are no significant differences in the distributions in realistic problems when using the two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to compare distributions. It was found that the log-logistic distribution which is a general form for the ratio of two correlated Pareto random variables, give a good fit to the estimated ratios.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.