Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Partially Hyperbolic Dynamics with Quasi-isometric Center

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A quasi-isometric center direction forces every non-wandering partially hyperbolic diffeomorphism of a closed 3-manifold into one of two rigid model classes.

desk verdict A serious classification paper for quasi-isometric center in dimension 3, with a real and repairable gap in Theorem 7.1; worth refereeing, not ready as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.11836 v1 pith:IB6CVVSV submitted 2024-11-18 math.DS math.GT

Ziqiang Feng This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DSmath.GT MSC 37D3037D2037A25
keywords partialhyperbolicityquasi-isometriccenteraccessibilityergodicityAnosovflowclassificationskewproductdiscretized
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms are maps with a $T^s \oplus T^c \oplus T^u$ splitting of the tangent bundle, where the stable and unstable directions are uniformly hyperbolic and the center direction is intermediate. This paper studies those in closed 3-manifolds whose center direction is quasi-isometric: the map stretches or shrinks center curves by at most a fixed affine factor. The central result is that, under the non-wandering condition, such a diffeomorphism is, up to a finite lift and iterate, either a skew product over an Anosov automorphism of the 2-torus or a discretized Anosov flow. From this classification the paper derives accessibility and, for volume-preserving maps, stable ergodicity; it also proves that an exponentially growing fundamental group forces the manifold to admit a transitive Anosov flow. The results settle the Hertz–Hertz–Ures ergodicity conjecture and the Pujals classification program within this class.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the quasi-isometric center foliation: an invariant $F^c$ for which there exist $A\ge 1$, $B>0$ with $A^{-1}L(c)-B\le L(f^n(c))\le AL(c)+B$ for every center curve $c$ and all $n\in\mathbb{Z}$. This condition is shown to force unique integrability of the center bundle (Proposition 3.3), completeness of the lifted center-stable and center-unstable foliations (Proposition 3.10), and existence of at least one periodic compact center leaf (Proposition 4.4). The classification then applies the Bonatti–Wilkinson dichotomy: a periodic compact center leaf with another compact center leaf in its $F^{cs}$ or $F^{cu}$ leaf yields a skew product, while its absence makes all center leaves periodic, producing a discretized Anosov flow. The homoclinic intersection number (Section 4.2) is the counting device that forces periodicity of all center leaves in the non-skew-product branch.

What would settle it

Find a non-wandering partially hyperbolic diffeomorphism with quasi-isometric center on a closed 3-manifold with non-virtually solvable fundamental group whose lifted center-stable leaf is not properly embedded (for instance, a leaf accumulating on itself), and show that it is neither conjugate to a skew product over an Anosov automorphism of $\mathbb{T}^2$ nor admits an iterate that is a discretized Anosov flow. A concrete check would be to exhibit a center leaf in the universal cover intersecting a stable leaf in more than one point.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core discovery is the rigidity of the quasi-isometric center condition. In a closed 3-manifold, if $f$ is a $C^1$ partially hyperbolic diffeomorphism with a quasi-isometric center foliation and $NW(f)=M$, then up to a finite lift and iterate $f$ is conjugate to a skew product over an Anosov automorphism on $\mathbb{T}^2$, or some iterate of $f$ is a discretized Anosov flow (Theorem D). This dichotomy yields the other main theorems: Theorem A states that when $\pi_1(M)$ is not virtually solvable, $f$ is accessible and, if conservative and $C^r$ with $r>1$, stably ergodic; Theorem B states that for $C^2$ conservative maps ergodicity is equivalent to transitivity; Theorem C states that if $\pi_1(M)$ has exponential growth then $M$ carries a transitive Anosov flow. The message is that a single geometric condition on the center direction collapses the open zoo of partially hyperbolic examples to two model classes, and the usual obstructions to ergodicity and Anosov flows vanish.

Load-bearing premise

The proof of Theorem 7.1 assumes without proof that the lifted center-stable and center-unstable leaves in the universal cover are properly embedded planes, which is needed to conclude that each center leaf meets each stable leaf exactly once and that the center leaf space is $\mathbb{R}$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The Hertz–Hertz–Ures ergodicity conjecture holds for this class: conservative $C^r$ maps with $r>1$, quasi-isometric center, and no $su$-torus are accessible and stably ergodic.
  • Every non-wandering partially hyperbolic diffeomorphism with quasi-isometric center on a closed 3-manifold with non-virtually solvable fundamental group is accessible.
  • If such a diffeomorphism exists on a manifold whose fundamental group has exponential growth, the manifold admits a transitive Anosov flow.
  • The classification is complete: no partially hyperbolic diffeomorphism with quasi-isometric center and $NW(f)=M$ can fall outside the two model classes up to finite lift and iterate.
  • For $C^2$ conservative maps with quasi-isometric center, transitivity and ergodicity are equivalent; any non-ergodic example must be non-transitive, as in the direct product of an Anosov map with the identity on a circle.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The author does not state this, but the proper-embeddedness premise in Theorem 7.1 might be derivable from a quasi-isometry estimate on lifted center curves, which would close the only unproved local step.
  • Although the paper focuses on Definition 2.1, the author notes that the arguments adapt to Definition 2.2; this suggests the classification is really a theorem about quasi-isometric action on the center bundle, not about the foliation per se.
  • An implicit test of Theorem B is Nassiri's conjecture: if every transitive $C^{1+}$ partially hyperbolic diffeomorphism with one-dimensional center on a closed 3-manifold is quasi-isometric in the center, then it must be ergodic.
  • The existence result Theorem C leaves open whether the transitive Anosov flow can always be chosen orbit-equivalent to the center foliation of a lift of $f$; the paper's proof only establishes that some transitive Anosov flow exists on the same manifold.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies C^1 partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms of closed 3-manifolds whose center foliation is quasi-isometric and whose non-wandering set is the whole manifold. The main announced results are: Theorem A, accessibility and stable ergodicity when the fundamental group is not virtually solvable and NW(f)=M; Theorem B, ergodicity equivalent to transitivity for C^2 conservative quasi-isometric-center diffeomorphisms; Theorem C, existence of a transitive Anosov flow when the fundamental group has exponential growth; and Theorem D, a classification into skew products over Anosov automorphisms on T^2 or discretized Anosov flows. The proof strategy combines central unique integrability and completeness of center-stable and center-unstable foliations (Section 3), existence of periodic compact center leaves and their homoclinic structure (Section 4), a transitive classification (Section 5), an accessibility argument using results from the companion paper [FU24] (Section 6), and a non-wandering classification (Section 7).

Significance. If all claims are completed, this would be a substantial contribution: it extends the Hertz-Hertz-Ures ergodicity conjecture to a broad quasi-isometric-center class, gives a topological Anosov flow from partial hyperbolicity under only an exponential-growth hypothesis, and provides a full classification under the non-wandering condition. The paper has real strengths: the careful comparison of quasi-isometric center foliations versus center bundles, the proof that the lifted invariant foliations are complete (Proposition 3.10), the periodic center leaf results of Section 4, and an accessibility proof in Section 6 that is largely independent of the classification. The author also honestly indicates reliance on the companion paper [FU24] and on the in-preparation independent work [EMP]. However, several load-bearing arguments are left unfinished, in particular the proper-embeddedness claim in the proof of Theorem 7.1 and the virtually solvable case of Theorem B. These gaps are significant enough that the manuscript cannot be accepted in its present form.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 7.1, proof of Theorem 7.1] The proof contains the unproved assertion that the leaves of the lifted foliation F~cs are properly embedded planes in R^3. Proposition 3.10 proves completeness of the lifted foliations, and Corollary 3.11 proves that projected leaves are cylinders or planes; neither statement implies proper embeddedness of the lifted leaves in the universal cover. The subsequent Poincaré-Bendixson argument uses proper embeddedness to rule out the possibility that a center leaf and a stable leaf inside a common F~cs leaf meet in more than one point. Without uniqueness of intersection, the conclusion that the center leaf space inside each F~cs leaf is homeomorphic to R is not justified, and therefore the application of [FP23a, Theorem 1.1] to obtain uniform quasi-geodesics and the construction of the expansive flow do not follow. Since Theorem 7.1 is used in Section 7.2 as an alternative route to accessibility and is presented as a coarser classification under the same hypotheses as Theorem D, this gap must be closed before the arguments as written can be accepted.
  2. [Section 6.3, proof of Theorem B] In the virtually solvable case, the proof relies on two unsupported statements. First, it asserts that "The set of all su-tori is compact and f-invariant by [Hae]"; the cited reference [Hae] is a general reference and the compactness of the union of all su-tori is not an obvious consequence. Second, it asserts without proof that "By transitivity, the map f|γ has irrational rotation number." Transitivity of f on M does not by itself imply transitivity of the induced circle map f|γ unless additional argument is supplied. These statements are load-bearing for the equivalence between ergodicity and transitivity in Theorem B, because they are used to conclude that f|γ is ergodic and that an invariant su-saturated set has full or null measure. A complete proof of these steps is needed.
  3. [Section 4.2, Proposition 4.8] The proof of Proposition 4.8 is only a sketch and contains non-obvious claims that are not justified. In particular, the statement that by the Poincaré-Bendixson theorem both c and c' accumulate on γ when F^cs(γ) ∪ F^cu(γ) contains no other compact center leaves requires an argument, and the claim that sγ(x) ∩ uγ(x^1_u) contains finitely many connected center curves needs a transversality and compactness justification that is not supplied. Proposition 4.8 is used in Proposition 5.5 to conclude that every homoclinic center leaf is periodic and hence that all center leaves in F^cs(γ) are periodic, which is then used to apply Theorem 5.3. Since Theorem 5.1 and therefore Theorem D depend on this chain, a complete proof or a precise reference to a full proof in [BZ20] is required.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous typographical errors, including "relavent", "tirvial", "pruduct", "clsoed", "accessbility", "devide", "contruct", and "explicitely". A careful proofreading pass is needed.
  2. [Section 2.1 and Section 3.1] Definitions 2.1 and 2.2 quantify the quasi-isometric inequalities over n ∈ N, while Lemmas 3.1 and 3.2 claim equivalence with inequalities for all n ∈ Z. The proof of (1) implies (2) is not written out for negative iterates; the argument needs to address why quasi-isometry for f implies the corresponding property for f^{-1}, or the statements and definitions should be adjusted consistently.
  3. [Section 3.1, proof of Lemma 3.1] The proof says "(1) to (2) follows by the choice of constants C = A and D = AB." This is not transparent; the relationship between the constants and the passage from positive to all integer iterates should be spelled out.
  4. [Section 7.3, proof of Theorem D] In the virtually solvable case, the statement "The first case cannot occur since it is homotopic to a uniformly hyperbolic map and thus cannot have quasi-isometric center" is asserted without proof. Since this exclusion is used in the classification, it should either be proved or supported by a precise reference.
  5. [References] The reference [Hae] is incomplete: no title, journal, or year is given. The in-preparation work [EMP] is cited for an independent related result; the manuscript should clarify, to the extent possible, the overlap and the provenance of the shared techniques.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reduction found; the proof chain does not define its hypotheses in terms of its conclusions, though Theorem 7.1 contains an unproved proper-embeddedness assertion that is a correctness gap rather than a circularity.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular in the sense of reducing a target conclusion to its own input. Quasi-isometric center (Definition 2.1) is an independent hypothesis; accessibility, ergodicity, Anosov-flow existence, and skew-product/discretized-Anosov classification are not embedded in the definition, and no parameter is fitted from a data subset and then reported as a prediction. The main proof routes are: Proposition 3.10 and Corollary 3.11 produce complete Fcs/Fcu with planar or cylindrical leaves; Proposition 4.4 produces periodic compact center leaves; external results [HP15], [BW05], [HHU08b], [FP22], [FP23a], and [BFP23] supply the classification and ergodicity inputs. The proof of Theorem 6.1 does import substantial ideal-boundary machinery from [FU24], a companion paper sharing the present author; this is a load-bearing same-author citation, but [FU24] addresses a different hypothesis and is not shown to assume the target theorems, so it is a provenance and verifiability concern rather than an equation-level circularity. The passage in Section 7.1 that states 'Note that the leaves of F~cs are properly embedded planes in R3' is unsupported: minimality of Fcs and Corollary 3.11 do not by themselves imply proper embeddedness of the lifted leaves in the universal cover, and the claim is used to obtain the unique center-stable intersection and the R-leaf space. This is a genuine proof gap and should be fixed, but a missing proof is not a circular definition or a fitted prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper adds no fitted constants or invented entities; it relies on a large external toolbox, some of it from the author's own companion work [FU24], which is the main burden of the derivation.

assumptions (8)
  • standard math Stable and unstable foliations exist and are unique for partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms (Brin-Pesin, Pugh-Shub).
    Invoked in Section 3 and Section 6 as the foundation for the foliations F^s and F^u.
  • standard math Theorem 6.2: for a non-wandering non-accessible partially hyperbolic diffeomorphism in a 3-manifold, the non-open accessibility set is an su-lamination or foliation with prescribed structure.
    Used in the proof of Theorem 6.1, Section 6.1.
  • standard math BZ20 Proposition A.1: a compact center-saturated set with uniformly compact center leaves yields a periodic compact center leaf nearby.
    Used in Proposition 4.4 to produce periodic compact center leaves.
  • standard math FU24 results on ideal boundary limits of stable leaves, uniform foliation characterization, and leafwise quasi-geodesic properties.
    These results from the author's companion paper carry the core of the accessibility proof in Theorem 6.1.
  • standard math HP15 classification of partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms on 3-manifolds with virtually solvable fundamental group.
    Used in Theorem 7.1 and Theorem D to reduce to skew products or discretized Anosov flows in the solvable case.
  • standard math BW05 Theorem 5.3: classification criterion for skew products and discretized Anosov flows from special compact center leaves.
    Used in Section 5, Propositions 5.4 and 5.5.
  • standard math HPS77 normal hyperbolicity theorem: a 2-normally hyperbolic invariant circle is a C^2 submanifold.
    Used in Theorem B to promote an invariant center circle to a smooth circle.
  • standard math Sha21: every transitive topological Anosov flow is orbit equivalent to a smooth Anosov flow.
    Used in Theorem C to build a smooth transitive Anosov flow.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Partially Hyperbolic Dynamics with Quasi-isometric Center." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IB6CVVSV

@misc{pith2026241111836,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Partially Hyperbolic Dynamics with Quasi-isometric Center},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IB6CVVSV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.11836}
}
abstract

We consider the class of partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms on a closed 3-manifold with quasi-isometric center. Under the non-wandering condition, we prove that the diffeomorphisms are accessible if there is no $su$-torus. As a consequence, volume-preserving diffeomorphisms in this context are ergodic in the absence of $su$-tori, thereby confirming the Hertz-Hertz-Ures Ergodicity Conjecture for this class. We show the existence of transitive Anosov flows on a closed 3-manifold admitting a non-wandering partially hyperbolic diffeomorphism with quasi-isometric center and fundamental group of exponential growth. Furthermore, we provide a complete classification of these diffeomorphisms, showing they fall into two categories: skew products and discretized Anosov flows.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms homotopic to the identity in dimension three

    math.DS 2025-05 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Conservative partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms homotopic to the identity on closed 3-manifolds with non-virtually-solvable fundamental group are always accessible and hence ergodic.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    D. V. Anosov , Geodesic flows on closed riemannian manifolds of negative curvature, Trudy Matematicheskogo Instituta Imeni VA Steklova 90 (1967), 3--210

    work page 1967

  2. [2]

    D. V. Anosov and J. G. Sinai , Certain smooth ergodic systems, Uspehi Mat. Nauk 22 no. 5(137) (1967), 107--172

    work page 1967

  3. [3]

    Avila , S

    A. Avila , S. Crovisier , and A. Wilkinson , C1 density of stable ergodicity, Advances in Mathematics 379 (2021), 107496

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Avila , On the regularization of conservative maps, Acta mathematica 205 no

    A. Avila , On the regularization of conservative maps, Acta mathematica 205 no. 1 (2010), 5--18

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Barbot , Generalizations of the bonatti--langevin example of anosov flow and their classification up to topological equivalence, Communications in Analysis and Geometry 6 no

    T. Barbot , Generalizations of the bonatti--langevin example of anosov flow and their classification up to topological equivalence, Communications in Analysis and Geometry 6 no. 4 (1998), 749--798

    work page 1998

  6. [6]

    Barbot and S

    T. Barbot and S. R. Fenley , Pseudo-anosov flows in toroidal manifolds, Geometry & Topology 17 no. 4 (2013), 1877--1954

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    Anosov flows with the same periodic orbits

    T. Barthelm \'e , S. Fenley , and K. Mann , Anosov flows with the same periodic orbits, arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.02098 (2023)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms homotopic to the identity in dimension 3, Part I: The dynamically coherent case

    T. Barthelm \'e , S. R. Fenley , S. Frankel , and R. Potrie , Partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms homotopic to the identity in dimension 3, part i: The dynamically coherent case, arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.06227 (2019)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

Show all 80 references
  1. [9]

    Barthelm \'e , S

    T. Barthelm \'e , S. R. Fenley , S. Frankel , and R. Potrie , Partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms homotopic to the identity in dimension 3, ii: Branching foliations, Geometry & Topology 27 no. 8 (2023), 3095--3181

    2023

  2. [10]

    Barthelm \'e , S

    T. Barthelm \'e , S. R. Fenley , and R. Potrie , Collapsed anosov flows and self orbit equivalences, Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 98 no. 4 (2023), 771--875

    2023

  3. [11]

    Barthelm \'e , S

    T. Barthelm \'e , S. Frankel , and K. Mann , Orbit equivalences of pseudo-anosov flows, arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.10505 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Barthelm \'e , C

    T. Barthelm \'e , C. Bonatti , and K. Mann , Non-transitive pseudo-anosov flows, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.03586 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Bonatti , A

    C. Bonatti , A. Gogolev , A. Hammerlindl , and R. Potrie , Anomalous partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms iii: abundance and incoherence, Geometry & Topology 24 no. 4 (2020), 1751--1790

    2020

  6. [14]

    Bonatti , A

    C. Bonatti , A. Gogolev , and R. Potrie , Anomalous partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms ii: stably ergodic examples, Inventiones Mathematicae 206 no. 3 (2016), 801--836

    2016

  7. [15]

    Bonatti and R

    C. Bonatti and R. Langevin , Diff\'eomorphismes de S male des surfaces, Ast\'erisque no. 250 (1998), viii+235, With the collaboration of E. Jeandenans

    1998

  8. [16]

    Bonatti , K

    C. Bonatti , K. Parwani , and R. Potrie , Anomalous partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms i: dynamically coherent examples, Annales Scientifiques de l' \'E cole Normale Sup \'e rieure 49 no. 6 (2016), 1387--1402

    2016

  9. [17]

    Bonatti and A

    C. Bonatti and A. Wilkinson , Transitive partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms on 3-manifolds, Topology 44 no. 3 (2005), 475--508

    2005

  10. [18]

    Bonatti and J

    C. Bonatti and J. Zhang , Transitive partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms with one-dimensional neutral center, Science China Mathematics 63 no. 9 (2020), 1647--1670

    2020

  11. [19]

    Bowen , Equilibrium states and the ergodic theory of anosov diffeomorphisms, Lecture notes in mathematics 470 (1975), 11--25

    R. Bowen , Equilibrium states and the ergodic theory of anosov diffeomorphisms, Lecture notes in mathematics 470 (1975), 11--25

    1975

  12. [20]

    Brin , Topological transitivity of one class of dynamic systems and flows of frames on manifolds of negative curvature, Functional Analysis and Its Applications 9 no

    M. Brin , Topological transitivity of one class of dynamic systems and flows of frames on manifolds of negative curvature, Functional Analysis and Its Applications 9 no. 1 (1975), 8--16

    1975

  13. [21]

    M. I. Brin and J. B. Pesin , Partially hyperbolic dynamical systems, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 38 (1974), 170--212

    1974

  14. [22]

    Burago and S

    D. Burago and S. Ivanov , Partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms of 3-manifolds with abelian fundamental groups, Journal of Modern Dynamics 2 no. 4 (2008), 541

    2008

  15. [23]

    Burns and A

    K. Burns and A. Wilkinson , Dynamical coherence and center bunching, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst 22 no. 1-2 (2008), 89--100

    2008

  16. [24]

    Burns and A

    K. Burns and A. Wilkinson , On the ergodicity of partially hyperbolic systems, Annals of Mathematics (2010), 451--489

    2010

  17. [25]

    Calegari and N

    D. Calegari and N. Dunfield , Laminations and groups of homeomorphisms of the circle, Inventiones mathematicae 152 no. 1 (2003), 149--204

    2003

  18. [26]

    Carrasco , F

    P. Carrasco , F. R. Hertz , J. R. Hertz , and R. Ures , Partially hyperbolic dynamics in dimension three, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 38 no. 8 (2018), 2801--2837

    2018

  19. [27]

    P. D. Carrasco , Compact dynamical foliations, Ergodic theory and dynamical systems 35 no. 8 (2015), 2474--2498

    2015

  20. [28]

    P. D. Carrasco , E. Pujals , and F. R. Hertz , Classification of partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms under some rigid conditions, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 41 no. 9 (2021), 2770--2781

    2021

  21. [29]

    Crovisier and M

    S. Crovisier and M. Poletti , Invariance principle and non-compact center foliations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.14989 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  22. [30]

    De Martino and S

    V. De Martino and S. Martinchich , Codimension one compact center foliations are uniformly compact, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 40 no. 9 (2020), 2349--2367

    2020

  23. [31]

    L. J. D \' az , E. R. Pujals , and R. Ures , Partial hyperbolicity and robust transitivity, Acta Mathematica 183 no. 1 (1999), 1--43

    1999

  24. [32]

    Didier , Stability of accessibility, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 23 no

    P. Didier , Stability of accessibility, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 23 no. 6 (2003), 1717--1731

    2003

  25. [33]

    Espitia , S

    M. Espitia , S. Martinchich , and R. Potrie , Quasi-isometric center action in dimension 3, In preparation

  26. [34]

    Feng and R

    Z. Feng and R. Ures , Accessibility and ergodicity of partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms without periodic points, arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07062 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Fenley , Laminar free hyperbolic 3-manifolds, Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 82 no

    S. Fenley , Laminar free hyperbolic 3-manifolds, Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 82 no. 2 (2007), 247--321

    2007

  28. [36]

    Fenley and R

    S. Fenley and R. Potrie , Partial hyperbolicity and pseudo-anosov dynamics, Geometric and Functional Analysis 34 no. 2 (2024), 409--485

    2024

  29. [37]

    S. R. Fenley and R. Potrie , Accessibility and ergodicity for collapsed anosov flows, arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.14630 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  30. [38]

    S. R. Fenley and R. Potrie , Ergodicity of partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms in hyperbolic 3-manifolds, Advances in Mathematics 401 (2022), 108315

    2022

  31. [39]

    S. R. Fenley and R. Potrie , Intersection of transverse foliations in 3-manifolds: Hausdorff leafspace implies leafwise quasi-geodesic, arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.05176 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    S. R. Fenley and R. Potrie , Transverse minimal foliations on unit tangent bundles and applications, arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.14525 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Franks and B

    J. Franks and B. Williams , Anomalous anosov flows, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Berlin Springer Verlag 819 (1980), 158

    1980

  34. [42]

    Fried , Transitive anosov flows and pseudo-anosov maps, Topology 22 no

    D. Fried , Transitive anosov flows and pseudo-anosov maps, Topology 22 no. 3 (1983), 299--303

    1983

  35. [43]

    Gabai , Foliations and 3-manifolds, in Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, 1, 1990, pp

    D. Gabai , Foliations and 3-manifolds, in Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, 1, 1990, pp. 609--619

    1990

  36. [44]

    Gan and Y

    S. Gan and Y. Shi , Rigidity of center lyapunov exponents and su -integrability, Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 95 no. 3 (2020), 569--592

    2020

  37. [45]

    Ghys , Flots d'anosov sur les 3-vari \'e t \'e s fibr \'e es en cercles, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 4 no

    \'E . Ghys , Flots d'anosov sur les 3-vari \'e t \'e s fibr \'e es en cercles, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 4 no. 1 (1984), 67--80

    1984

  38. [46]

    Goodman , Dehn surgery on anosov flows, Lecture Notes in Mathematics (1983), 300--307

    S. Goodman , Dehn surgery on anosov flows, Lecture Notes in Mathematics (1983), 300--307

    1983

  39. [47]

    Haefliger , Varietes Feuilletees

    A. Haefliger , Varietes Feuilletees

  40. [48]

    Hammerlindl , Leaf conjugacies on the torus, Ergodic theory and dynamical systems 33 no

    A. Hammerlindl , Leaf conjugacies on the torus, Ergodic theory and dynamical systems 33 no. 3 (2013), 896--933

    2013

  41. [49]

    Hammerlindl and R

    A. Hammerlindl and R. Potrie , Pointwise partial hyperbolicity in three-dimensional nilmanifolds, Journal of the London Mathematical Society 89 no. 3 (2014), 853--875

    2014

  42. [50]

    Hammerlindl and R

    A. Hammerlindl and R. Potrie , Classification of partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms in 3-manifolds with solvable fundamental group, Journal of Topology 8 no. 3 (2015), 842--870

    2015

  43. [51]

    Hammerlindl and R

    A. Hammerlindl and R. Potrie , Partial hyperbolicity and classification: a survey, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 38 no. 2 (2018), 401--443

    2018

  44. [52]

    Hammerlindl and Y

    A. Hammerlindl and Y. Shi , Accessibility of derived-from-anosov systems, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 374 no. 4 (2021), 2949--2966

    2021

  45. [53]

    Hammerlindl and R

    A. Hammerlindl and R. Ures , Ergodicity and partial hyperbolicity on the 3-torus, Communications in Contemporary Mathematics 16 no. 04 (2014), 1350038

    2014

  46. [54]

    Hammerlindl , J

    A. Hammerlindl , J. R. Hertz , and R. Ures , Ergodicity and partial hyperbolicity on seifert manifolds, Journal of Modern Dynamics (2020), 331

    2020

  47. [55]

    Handel and W

    M. Handel and W. P. Thurston , Anosov flows on new three manifolds, Inventiones mathematicae 59 (1980), 95--103

    1980

  48. [56]

    M. R. Herman , Sur la conjugaison diff \'e rentiable des diff \'e omorphismes du cercle \`a des rotations, Publications Math \'e matiques de l'IH \'E S 49 (1979), 5--233

    1979

  49. [57]

    F. R. Hertz , J. R. Hertz , and R. Ures , Tori with hyperbolic dynamics in 3-manifolds, Journal of Modern Dynamics 5 no. 1 (2011), 185--202

    2011

  50. [58]

    F. R. Hertz , J. R. Hertz , and R. Ures , Center-unstable foliations do not have compact leaves, Mathematical Research Letters (2015)

    2015

  51. [59]

    F. R. Hertz , J. R. Hertz , and R. Ures , A non-dynamically coherent example on t3, Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré C, Analyse non linéaire 33 no. 4 (2016), 1023--1032

    2016

  52. [60]

    F. R. Hertz , M. R. Hertz , and R. Ures , Accessibility and stable ergodicity for partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms with 1d-center bundle, Inventiones Mathematicae 2 no. 172 (2008), 353--381

    2008

  53. [61]

    F. R. Hertz , M. R. Hertz , and R. Ures , Partial hyperbolicity and ergodicity in dimension three, Journal of Modern Dynamics 2 no. 2 (2008), 187--208

    2008

  54. [62]

    Hirsch , C

    M. Hirsch , C. Pugh , and M. Shub , Invariant manifolds. springer lecture notes in mathematics, 583., (1977)

    1977

  55. [63]

    o lder , Die axiome der quantit \

    O. H \"o lder , Die axiome der quantit \"a t und die lehre vom mass , Teubner, 1901

    1901

  56. [64]

    a tischen Linien in Mannigfaltigkeiten negativer Kr \

    E. Hopf , Statistik der geod \"a tischen Linien in Mannigfaltigkeiten negativer Kr \"u mmung , Hirzel, 1939

    1939

  57. [65]

    Inaba and S

    T. Inaba and S. Matsumoto , Nonsingular expansive flows on 3-manifolds and foliations with circle prong singularities, Japanese journal of mathematics. New series 16 no. 2 (1990), 329--340

    1990

  58. [66]

    some smooth ergodic systems

    G. Margulis , Y-flows on three-dimensional manifolds, appendix to anosov-sinai:“some smooth ergodic systems”. uspekhi math. nauk, 22 (1967), 107-172, Russian Math. Surveys 22 (1967), 103--168

    1967

  59. [67]

    Martinchich , Global stability of discretized anosov flows, Journal of Modern Dynamics 19 (2023), 561--623

    S. Martinchich , Global stability of discretized anosov flows, Journal of Modern Dynamics 19 (2023), 561--623

    2023

  60. [68]

    Mosher , Dynamical systems and the homology norm of a 3-manifold, i: Efficient intersection of surfaces and flows, Duke Mathematical Journal 65 no

    L. Mosher , Dynamical systems and the homology norm of a 3-manifold, i: Efficient intersection of surfaces and flows, Duke Mathematical Journal 65 no. 3 (1992), 449--500

    1992

  61. [69]

    Mosher , Dynamical systems and the homology norm of a 3-manifold ii, Inventiones Mathematicae 107 no

    L. Mosher , Dynamical systems and the homology norm of a 3-manifold ii, Inventiones Mathematicae 107 no. 1 (1992), 243--281

    1992

  62. [70]

    Paternain , Expansive flows and the fundamental group, Boletim da Sociedade Brasileira de Matem \'a tica 24 no

    M. Paternain , Expansive flows and the fundamental group, Boletim da Sociedade Brasileira de Matem \'a tica 24 no. 2 (1993), 179--199

    1993

  63. [71]

    J. F. Plante , Anosov flows, transversely affine foliations, and a conjecture of verjovsky, Journal of the London Mathematical Society 2 no. 2 (1981), 359--362

    1981

  64. [72]

    J. F. Plante and W. P. Thurston , Anosov flows and the fundamental group, Topology 11 no. 2 (1972), 147--150

    1972

  65. [73]

    Potrie , Robust dynamics, invariant structures and topological classification, in Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians 2018, World Scientific, 2018, pp

    R. Potrie , Robust dynamics, invariant structures and topological classification, in Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians 2018, World Scientific, 2018, pp. 2063--2085

    2018

  66. [74]

    Pugh and M

    C. Pugh and M. Shub , Ergodicity of A nosov actions, Inventiones Mathematicae 15 (1972), 1--23

    1972

  67. [75]

    Roberts , J

    R. Roberts , J. Shareshian , and M. Stein , Infinitely many hyperbolic 3-manifolds which contain no reebless foliation, Journal of the American Mathematical Society 16 no. 3 (2003), 639--679

    2003

  68. [76]

    Rosenberg , Foliations by planes, Topology 7 no

    H. Rosenberg , Foliations by planes, Topology 7 no. 2 (1968), 131--138

    1968

  69. [77]

    Shannon , Hyperbolic models for transitive topological anosov flows in dimension three, arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.12000 (2021)

    M. Shannon , Hyperbolic models for transitive topological anosov flows in dimension three, arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.12000 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  70. [78]

    W. P. Thurston , The geometry and topology of 3-manifolds, Lecture note (1978)

    1978

  71. [79]

    Yu , Anosov flows on dehn surgeries on the figure-eight knot, Duke Mathematical Journal 172 no

    B. Yu , Anosov flows on dehn surgeries on the figure-eight knot, Duke Mathematical Journal 172 no. 11 (2023), 2195--2240

    2023

  72. [80]

    Zhang , Partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms with one-dimensional neutral center on 3-manifolds, Journal of Modern Dynamics 17 no

    J. Zhang , Partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms with one-dimensional neutral center on 3-manifolds, Journal of Modern Dynamics 17 no. 0 (2021), 557--584

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.