REVIEW 3 cited by
Toward Fairness in AI for People with Disabilities: A Research Roadmap
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
AI technologies have the potential to dramatically impact the lives of people with disabilities (PWD). Indeed, improving the lives of PWD is a motivator for many state-of-the-art AI systems, such as automated speech recognition tools that can caption videos for people who are deaf and hard of hearing, or language prediction algorithms that can augment communication for people with speech or cognitive disabilities. However, widely deployed AI systems may not work properly for PWD, or worse, may actively discriminate against them. These considerations regarding fairness in AI for PWD have thus far received little attention. In this position paper, we identify potential areas of concern regarding how several AI technology categories may impact particular disability constituencies if care is not taken in their design, development, and testing. We intend for this risk assessment of how various classes of AI might interact with various classes of disability to provide a roadmap for future research that is needed to gather data, test these hypotheses, and build more inclusive algorithms.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Analyzing Fairness of Computer Vision and Natural Language Processing Models
Chaining fairness mitigation algorithms across ML lifecycle stages sometimes reduces bias more than single-stage application, but the evidence here is under-specified and partly circular.
-
Analyzing Fairness of Classification Machine Learning Model with Structured Dataset
On the Adult income dataset, fairness libraries Fairlearn, AIF360, and What-If Tool all reduce measured gender disparity in a credit-style classifier, but the paper's comparison across libraries is not controlled.
-
AI and Accessibility: A Discussion of Ethical Considerations
A viewpoint article that outlines the ethical challenges of AI for people with disabilities and urges responsible development.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.